Why does anyone NEED an assault rifle?

Add the other guns !!

How many mass killings were done with “hands, fists, feet”

Laws n the books need help

Willing to help?

No? Then the blood is on your ”hands, fists, feet” argument

Shitty Logic
 
And HOW did the pinheaded-little juveniles get a gun? Not ONE of the DEMS Gun Control proposals would have prevented the shootings.
The Majority of so-called Mass Shootings occur in "GUN-FREE ZONES"! Sandy Hook, New Town, Columbine, Parkland . . .
Fact MORE people are killed by Hands and Feet than by Semi-Automatic weapons.


Worm? Rather a Wolf than a Little Bo-Peep!

Make it harder to legally obtain firearms. This isn't complex, this is a matter of we don't give a shit on the right.
 
Make it harder to legally obtain firearms. This isn't complex, this is a matter of we don't give a shit on the right.

Wrong.

It's a matter of the highest court having spoken and you don't get to have it your way. Jumping up and down and screaming on the sidewalk that you're going to insist on violating the law isn't a winning strategy either.

Based on how often and consistently the Left does both of those things, I'd say the "we don't give a shit" attitude rests with them and not with conservatives.
 
Why does Joe Sixpack need high capacity magazines? Military, sure. Police? maybe. But the average US citizen has no reason whatsoever for a high capacity magazine.
Your alleged "high capacity" magazines are really standard capacity magazines. You might take the time to note the 1860 Henry Rifle had a 15 round capacity magazine and it was in common use. My dad gave me a Marlin model 60 .22 it was made in the 60s and has a 15-17 round capacity. Over 10 million were made and sold in the US. The whole magazine argument is bullshit. The problem is and will always be bad people.
 
Nonsense. Their special firearms officers have access to submachine guns and military grade selective fire rifles.
As I said, the UK specialist firearms officers do not have continuous fire machine guns, sub or otherwise. Their rifles are single shot, they used to be trained to double-tap at targets but nowadays it's single shot, re-aim, single shot.

You seem to have an active imagination regarding the procedures of UK police.
 
Wrong.

It's a matter of the highest court having spoken and you don't get to have it your way. Jumping up and down and screaming on the sidewalk that you're going to insist on violating the law isn't a winning strategy either.

Based on how often and consistently the Left does both of those things, I'd say the "we don't give a shit" attitude rests with them and not with conservatives.
Who gives a shit what the highest court said? Can you name a single case of the left not caring who live or dies cus I will confirm or deny any of them but you won't.
 
Many men in the United States derive a feeling of masculine identity from their ownership of guns. For these men the thought of gun control arouses a fear similar to castration anxiety. Many men and women in the United States think that is pretty disgusting. In civilized countries even conservatives ask, "Why would anyone want to own a gun?"
 
As I said, the UK specialist firearms officers do not have continuous fire machine guns, sub or otherwise. Their rifles are single shot, they used to be trained to double-tap at targets but nowadays it's single shot, re-aim, single shot.

You seem to have an active imagination regarding the procedures of UK police.
First of all, your use of the term single shot is 100% wrong. What you are describing is semi-automatic fire. I researched the weapons available amd multiples listed have select fire capability.
 
Many men in the United States derive a feeling of masculine identity from their ownership of guns. For these men the thought of gun control arouses a fear similar to castration anxiety. Many men and women in the United States think that is pretty disgusting. In civilized countries even conservatives ask, "Why would anyone want to own a gun?"
This is conjecture on your part and essentially meaningless.
 
First of all, your use of the term single shot is 100% wrong. What you are describing is semi-automatic fire. I researched the weapons available amd multiples listed have select fire capability.
You may have researched the weapons online, but I have spoken to the officers, several of whom I actually know.
 
Guns are disgusting. Men who love guns are disgusting. I want the government to punish them by confiscating their guns. I favor confiscation without compensation.
Good for you. Your view of totalitarian government control being a good idea doesn't surprise me.
 
You may have researched the weapons online, but I have spoken to the officers, several of whom I actually know.
So essentially they are armed with single action revolvers and bolt action rifles or possibly a pump shotgun. Is that what you are claiming?
 
Good for you. Your view of totalitarian government control being a good idea doesn't surprise me.
I would like for the U.S. government to become more democratic than it is by ending the Electoral College and the Senate, and by weakening the Supreme Court. I would also like to end the power of money in American politics.
 
I would like for the U.S. government to become more democratic than it is by ending the Electoral College and the Senate, and by weakening the Supreme Court. I would also like to end the power of money in American politics.
Your understanding of the Electoral College shows a complete lack of understanding of why the Founding Fathers designed the system that way. It was designed so that everywhere in the country had a say in the Presidential election not just the major metropolitan areas. The way the country is populated now New York and California would decide every single Presidential election and disenfranchise the rest of the country. So unless you desire for those 2 states to run the country the system in place works just fine.
 
I would like for the U.S. government to become more democratic than it is by ending the Electoral College and the Senate, and by weakening the Supreme Court. I would also like to end the power of money in American politics.
Democracies rot from the bottom, Monarchies/Dictatorships rot from the top. Obviously you prefer bottom rot.

As far as money is concerned, please explain, in detail, how you envision that may occur.
 
Back
Top