Why does anyone NEED an assault rifle?

Your understanding of the Electoral College shows a complete lack of understanding of why the Founding Fathers designed the system that way. It was designed so that everywhere in the country had a say in the Presidential election not just the major metropolitan areas. The way the country is populated now New York and California would decide every single Presidential election and disenfranchise the rest of the country. So unless you desire for those 2 states to run the country the system in place works just fine.
I do not care what the so called "Founding Fathers" had to say about anything. They were intelligent and well educated for their time, but they were not infallible.

Also, the United States they governed was very different than it is now.
 
Last edited:
Democracies rot from the bottom, Monarchies/Dictatorships rot from the top. Obviously you prefer bottom rot.

As far as money is concerned, please explain, in detail, how you envision that may occur.
We can have political campaigns financed by the government. Other democratic governments have this.
 
My question, and I rarely pipe in on politics, is this; what would one accomplish with even a nationwide bad on assault weapons?
Allow me to explain:
~50K gun deaths per year.
~ 1/2 suicide; leaves 25K
~3% involve rifles, for the sake of this that is 100% assault weapons. Assume*
100 people.
 
Your understanding of the Electoral College shows a complete lack of understanding of why the Founding Fathers designed the system that way. It was designed so that everywhere in the country had a say in the Presidential election not just the major metropolitan areas. The way the country is populated now New York and California would decide every single Presidential election and disenfranchise the rest of the country. So unless you desire for those 2 states to run the country the system in place works just fine.

That's the lie they tell you in school. The EC (which really wasn't designed so much as its a side effect) was put in place to protect New York. If we actually followed the Constitution CA and NY WOULD decide the presidency anyway as is our right.
 
Democracies rot from the bottom, Monarchies/Dictatorships rot from the top. Obviously you prefer bottom rot.

As far as money is concerned, please explain, in detail, how you envision that may occur.
Democracy is a pernicious evil.

The majority hold no firm grasp on truth or fairness and in fact when flush with power, do the most egregious things to those not in the majority.
 
That's the lie they tell you in school. The EC (which really wasn't designed so much as its a side effect) was put in place to protect New York. If we actually followed the Constitution CA and NY WOULD decide the presidency anyway as is our right.
Perfect example of what I posited in post #2084.
 
That's the lie they tell you in school. The EC (which really wasn't designed so much as its a side effect) was put in place to protect New York. If we actually followed the Constitution CA and NY WOULD decide the presidency anyway as is our right

Then they should secede and form their own country.
 
Last edited:
No you are a socialist who masquerades as a democrat.
Socialists do not need to masquerade as Democrats.

----------

Gallup, AUGUST 13, 2018

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- For the first time in Gallup's measurement over the past decade, Democrats have a more positive image of socialism than they do of capitalism.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS​

 
Who gives a shit what the highest court said? Can you name a single case of the left not caring who live or dies cus I will confirm or deny any of them but you won't.

I give a shit. That you and others don't seem to is why the world is so fucked right now.
 
My question, and I rarely pipe in on politics, is this; what would one accomplish with even a nationwide bad on assault weapons?
Allow me to explain:
~50K gun deaths per year.
~ 1/2 suicide; leaves 25K
~3% involve rifles, for the sake of this that is 100% assault weapons. Assume*
100 people.

Because those ~100 gun deaths per year are scarier than the other ~49,900. That's why.
 
The general population should not have access to assault rifles. Absolutely crazy.

Why is it any crazier than the general population having access to chemicals which kill hundreds of thousands every year (Fentanyl, Heroin, cocaine)?
 
I would like for the U.S. government to become more democratic than it is by ending the Electoral College and the Senate, and by weakening the Supreme Court. I would also like to end the power of money in American politics.
Are you an American?
 
Back
Top