FBI: Deplorables are in BIG trouble and should be peeing themselves

[Grendelpuppy]

This is why our founding fathers gave us the Second Amendment. The doctrine of felony murder being applied against hundreds of peaceful protestors after the police fatally shot an unarmed, White

You mean insurrectionists.



We hope they try again. Pew pew. ❤

You do understand that many of us deplorables are expert marksmen who can hit a human from over half a mile away? Unlike the African American community, we aren't in the habit of shooting people. We prefer the rule of law. God help you if we decide to go on the warpath.

 

[jaF0]

Dud(e), this ain't 4Chan.

Your shit don't belong here.

 

[ll74]

You do understand that many of us deplorables are expert marksmen who can hit a human from over half a mile away? Unlike the African American community, we aren't in the habit of shooting people. We prefer the rule of law. God help you if we decide to go on the warpath.

When you need to hit a target, you won't have time to set your shit up.

 

[RoryN]

the police fatally shot an unarmed, White

You do understand that many of us deplorables are expert marksmen who can hit a human from over half a mile away? Unlike the African American community, we aren't in the habit of shooting people. We prefer the rule of law. God help you if we decide to go on the warpath.

Perhaps I didn't properly introduce myself? Hi - I'm RoryN!

And I've been expertly pissing off dumb, weak little racists such as yourself @ Lit since 2003. Like, really making them angry, until they're frothing at the mouth, chasing me (in vain) all over the Internet, and generally losing their shit, to a hilarious extent.

You responded to me because I had you pegged early. I wanted you to say something stupid and full of race-related rage. I now have you posting about white vs. African-American and the "rule of law" while - with no irony detected on your moronic part - talking about going "on the warpath".

See how easy that was? Thanks for playing!

(And no one is scared of you Deplorables and your bullshit boasting about guns - not one bit. Come back for some more, k? Mwah.)

 

[Fuzzy1975]

You do understand that many of us deplorables are expert marksmen who can hit a human from over half a mile away? Unlike the African American community, we aren't in the habit of shooting people. We prefer the rule of law. God help you if we decide to go on the warpath.

Thanks for the laugh.

Are you honestly trying to sell us,that you can shoot out to a 6" spread at 1760 yards? Like give me a fucking break.

Ok bozo, what rifle you got? Cause I am calling out your fucking bullshit!!

90% of the American hunters I've met can't even shoot a three round spread of 1.25 " at two hundred yards...guess they must have been Democrats eh?

 

[phrodeau]

It’s quite a claim when one isn’t in the habit of shooting people, to say one can hit a human a half mile away. What’s it possibly based on?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

It’s quite a claim when one isn’t in the habit of shooting people, to say one can hit a human a half mile away. What’s it possibly based on?

holes in paper, from a bench, on a range, with no concern about the paper shooting back...The dipshit should check out Reddit, lots of video from Ukraine there. People shooting at each other from 20' apart missing each other. Kind of funny how fear affects you.


But this dumb fuck American thinks he can shoot from a half mile out....sure and I got suit cases of thousand dollar bills I plan on giving away...

 

[butters]

It’s quite a claim when one isn’t in the habit of shooting people, to say one can hit a human a half mile away. What’s it possibly based on?

alternate reality?
wishful thinking?
an overdeveloped imagination?

 

[coati]

God help you if we decide to go on the warpath.

Yup, shakin' in my boots. Oh wait, that was just from my laughter.

 

[Grendelpuppy]

Perhaps I didn't properly introduce myself? Hi - I'm RoryN!

And I've been expertly pissing off dumb, weak little racists such as yourself @ Lit since 2003. Like, really making them angry, until they're frothing at the mouth, chasing me (in vain) all over the Internet, and generally losing their shit, to a hilarious extent.

You responded to me because I had you pegged early. I wanted you to say something stupid and full of race-related rage. I now have you posting about white vs. African-American and the "rule of law" while - with no irony detected on your moronic part - talking about going "on the warpath".

See how easy that was? Thanks for playing!

(And no one is scared of you Deplorables and your bullshit boasting about guns - not one bit. Come back for some more, k? Mwah.)

Excuse the Hell out of me. African Americans have been on the warpath for over a century. They are only 1/8 of the population yet they commit over 1/2 of the homicides. Historically, more whites are killed by Blacks then Blacks killed by whites. Now it seems to be getting far worse but the FBI has ceased to publish the data and many jurisdictions are not reporting.

 

[jaF0]

^^^ Hey Engleman, how it's going?

 

[phrodeau]

Historically, more whites are killed by Blacks then Blacks killed by whites.

Your history book must be really thin.

 

[RoryN]

Excuse the Hell out of me. African Americans have been on the warpath for over a century. They are only 1/8 of the population yet they commit over 1/2 of the homicides. Historically, more whites are killed by Blacks then Blacks killed by whites.

^^^From trying to keep his cool to full-blown Deplorable trash in one post.

I'm doin' it old school, baby.

 

[Holy_Seduction]

African Americans have been on the warpath for over a century. They are only 1/8 of the population yet they commit over 1/2 of the homicides. Historically, more whites are killed by Blacks then Blacks killed by whites. Now it seems to be getting far worse but the FBI has ceased to publish the data and many jurisdictions are not reporting.

This statement is inaccurate, dishonest, and lacks perspective.

Firstly, the term "warpath" is an offensive and derogatory term that has no place in civil discourse.

Secondly, the claim that African Americans have been on the "warpath" for over a century is a gross oversimplification of the complex history of race relations in the United States.

Thirdly, the claim that African Americans commit over half of homicides is a misleading statistic that ignores important context. While it's true that African Americans are overrepresented in homicide statistics, this is largely due to systemic issues such as poverty, lack of access to education and healthcare, and over-policing in communities of color.

Fourthly, the claim that historically more whites are killed by Blacks than Blacks killed by whites is also misleading. While it's true that there have been instances of violence committed by African Americans against white people, this ignores the much larger historical context of systemic racism and violence committed by white people against African Americans, including slavery, lynchings, and other forms of racial violence.

And the claim that the FBI has ceased to publish data on this topic and that many jurisdictions are not reporting is false. The FBI continues to publish data on crime statistics, including homicides, and while there may be issues with underreporting in some jurisdictions, this is not a widespread problem that undermines the validity of crime statistics as a whole.

African Americans are more likely to live in poverty than white Americans, and poverty is strongly associated with higher rates of crime. African Americans are more likely to live in neighborhoods with higher crime rates, and are also more likely to be targeted by police and the criminal justice system, which can contribute to higher rates of arrest and incarceration.

Taking the statistic that African Americans are overrepresented in homicide statistics without taking into account these larger systemic issues is insufficient and can be misleading. It seeks to conceal actual underlying social class causes while tying crime statistics, including murder, directly to black people.

You cannot address these issues in a comprehensive and equitable manner without the critical underlying issues.

It very much serves the interests of the ruling classes to suppress and to divert attention away from social class. Focusing on race is a ‘safe’ way to do that.

I’m not interested in race as it is not in my opinion a valid sociological category and I believe its use in all cases to be rooted in racism. But now that this error has been pointed out to you, I expect you to stop using that approach.

If you refuse to do so and persist on your present path, you can expect to reap scorn in abundant measure.

 

[butters]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...&cvid=16a3ff936c8e48388e4df766d3f4f77f&ei=126

got into the building, took selfies, sat and went in places they had no business being, refused to comply with officers' orders, physically tussled with cops, physically assaulted at least one of them, got thrown out and STILL returned inside before deciding they'd had enough and asked cops to be allowed to leave.

scum

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Excuse the Hell out of me. African Americans have been on the warpath for over a century. They are only 1/8 of the population yet they commit over 1/2 of the homicides. Historically, more whites are killed by Blacks then Blacks killed by whites. Now it seems to be getting far worse but the FBI has ceased to publish the data and many jurisdictions are not reporting.

This statement is inaccurate, dishonest, and lacks perspective.

Firstly, the term "warpath" is an offensive and derogatory term that has no place in civil discourse.

Secondly, the claim that African Americans have been on the "warpath" for over a century is a gross oversimplification of the complex history of race relations in the United States.

Thirdly, the claim that African Americans commit over half of homicides is a misleading statistic that ignores important context. While it's true that African Americans are overrepresented in homicide statistics, this is largely due to systemic issues such as poverty, lack of access to education and healthcare, and over-policing in communities of color.

Fourthly, the claim that historically more whites are killed by Blacks than Blacks killed by whites is also misleading. While it's true that there have been instances of violence committed by African Americans against white people, this ignores the much larger historical context of systemic racism and violence committed by white people against African Americans, including slavery, lynchings, and other forms of racial violence.

And the claim that the FBI has ceased to publish data on this topic and that many jurisdictions are not reporting is false. The FBI continues to publish data on crime statistics, including homicides, and while there may be issues with underreporting in some jurisdictions, this is not a widespread problem that undermines the validity of crime statistics as a whole.

African Americans are more likely to live in poverty than white Americans, and poverty is strongly associated with higher rates of crime. African Americans are more likely to live in neighborhoods with higher crime rates, and are also more likely to be targeted by police and the criminal justice system, which can contribute to higher rates of arrest and incarceration.

Taking the statistic that African Americans are overrepresented in homicide statistics without taking into account these larger systemic issues is insufficient and can be misleading. It seeks to conceal actual underlying social class causes while tying crime statistics, including murder, directly to black people.

You cannot address these issues in a comprehensive and equitable manner without the critical underlying issues.

It very much serves the interests of the ruling classes to suppress and to divert attention away from social class. Focusing on race is a ‘safe’ way to do that.

I’m not interested in race as it is not in my opinion a valid sociological category and I believe its use in all cases to be rooted in racism. But now that this error has been pointed out to you, I expect you to stop using that approach.

If you refuse to do so and persist on your present path, you can expect to reap scorn in abundant measure.

And if you don't think this knocked the fuck out your Racist mind Grundelpuppy, then as I suspect, you have shit for brains....

Thanks for ducking on your "marksman" post too, bullshit as I also suspected.

 

[jaF0]

Donald Trump embraces Jan. 6 defendant who wants Mike Pence executed​

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/www.msn.com.icoNBC News|3 hours ago
MANCHESTER, N.H. — Former President Donald Trump embraced a Jan. 6 defendant at a diner during a campaign stop Thursday night, calling the woman, who served prison time for her actions during the ...

 

[jaF0]

Still lockin' 'em up ....

(but, no weapons were there, right?)

​

U.S. News // 1 hour ago
Florida man charged with throwing explosive at police during Jan. 6 attack
May 3 (UPI) -- A Florida man has been charged with felony offenses on accusations he threw an explosive device that detonated above law enforcement clashing with rioters in a Capitol tunnel during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on Congress.

​

 

[butters]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/t...1&cvid=59e1ec7c45ed45b3d2369eae7267e6b3&ei=94

Testifying in his own defense, Padilla conceded he was guilty of some crimes, but not others. He insisted that the violent rhetoric he posted online about the Capitol attack wasn’t reality-based, but was for “internet cool points.” He said that exaggeration was part of "gaming subculture" and that he engaged in "heated political rhetoric" because he liked to "shock people." He said that he was trying to fit in with the community of Trump supporters.

"We would have been in the Seat of Power. All we would need to do is declare our grievances with the government and dissolve the legislature, and replace it with Patriots who were there. Then simply re-adopt the Constitution with amendments added to secure future Federal elections," Padilla wrote.

"My conscious is clear," he wrote. "Treason my ass. Keep on being jealous that I'm not a cowardly worm." Padilla wrote that he thought he would die in the fray on Jan. 6, but “God was on my side.”

stupid is as stupid does

 

[jaF0]

""We would have been in the Seat of Power. All we would need to do is declare our grievances with the government and dissolve the legislature, and replace it with Patriots who were there. Then simply re-adopt the Constitution with amendments added to secure future Federal elections," Padilla wrote."


Ummm, that's called a coup.

 

[Pad_Foot]

Ummm? That’s not how the Constitution gets changed.

 

[butters]

""We would have been in the Seat of Power. All we would need to do is declare our grievances with the government and dissolve the legislature, and replace it with Patriots who were there. Then simply re-adopt the Constitution with amendments added to secure future Federal elections," Padilla wrote."


Ummm, that's called a coup.

+

Ummm? That’s not how the Constitution gets changed.

the problem is that these people did, and many still do, believe all the lies they were spoonfed by people in high places, and think that what they did was not only justified but patriotic. stupid people, but the ones on whose shoulders the main burden of blames lies are those like hawley, greene, cruz, and all the rest of them

 

[jaF0]

DOJ secures longest sentence yet for convicted Jan. 6 defendant​

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/abcnews.go.com.icoABC|41 minutes ago
Peter Schwartz has been sentenced to 14 years behind bars. The Department of Justice secured its most severe sentence for a convicted Jan. 6 defendant yet -- a marked victory for the government as it pursues those accused of attempting an insurrection.

 

[Dribble]

When I lived in Oregon and Bobo lived in California...he was talking shit about being such a great shot. I offered to drive down...meet him at a local range...and squeeze off a few shots. Funny how quickly the fucker backed out....claiming he couldn't trust me not shooting him. Lol. Here it is...10 years later(?) and all this time he could have had bragging rights if he could pull off a smaller grouping than me. Guess...he wasn't as good as he thought?

 

[RoryN]

DOJ secures longest sentence yet for convicted Jan. 6 defendant​

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/abcnews.go.com.icoABC|41 minutes ago
Peter Schwartz has been sentenced to 14 years behind bars. The Department of Justice secured its most severe sentence for a convicted Jan. 6 defendant yet -- a marked victory for the government as it pursues those accused of attempting an insurrection.

Fantastic news. Almost beautiful, in a way.