Hi-Point 10mm: The 10mm No One Wanted

Reports are coming out almost daily of a legally armed citizen causing a wannabe criminal to achieve room temperature.
 
Those should be ignored. What you want is a report on kids getting guns and shooting people.

One of those is more important than a dozen successful self-defense shootings.
 
Firearms as a concept were invented to kill people, a firearm that cannot kill someone is a rare thing. Try suggesting to the army that they re-arm with knives, hammers, baseball bats and drunk drivers, see how loudly they laugh.
Again, I did say guns could be used to kill people, but your assertion that that is all they are for is narrow minded and frankly ignorant. There are many sportsman like me that love to target shoot and have not ever pointed a gun at a human being, let alone shot, or killed anyone.

I get it, you're anti-gun, hurray for you. I'm not a fan of motorcycles, or the rude assholes that ride some of them, but I would not tell you not to own or ride one as long as you obey the law while riding.
 
NASA was devoted to putting payloads into space the size of nuclear devices to intimidate the Soviets.

We should simply walk away from the Space Program.

Right???

The Americas were discovered as part of Europe's constant squabbles and warfare*.
Abandon them too since they are "conflict continents?"


PS - What were bows, arrows and spears invented for?
David's sling???





* Not just militarily, but economic and religious too.
Histrionics.
 
Those should be ignored. What you want is a report on kids getting guns and shooting people.

One of those is more important than a dozen successful self-defense shootings.
When was the last time you heard of a six-year-old successfully using a gun in self-defense?

You are a real piece of dumb.
 
Not true at all for all firearms.
At this point in history, you are correct. However that was not the case a few hundred years ago. That is the point, the Fire Lance was designed to kill people. It was from this that all other firearm development began. So at any point it is disingenuous at best, out right lying at worse to state that firearms are designed for anything other than killing. In the modern world of today, some are better at killing people, others at killing prey. Some are really only good for making holes in targets,but still if they are used improperly, and they too can kill.
Of course they can be used to kill people, but so can knives, hammers, baseball bats, and drunk drivers.
I also never said that firearms are the only weapon that can kill. Why do people go off on these stupid childish diversions. Hell you can claim a puddle of water can kill, and you'd be correct,if you really wish to get that pedantic.

The point to understand is simple, firearms make great killing weapons, far superior to just about every other device that can be used to kill, with the exception of even bigger firearms ( canons,mortars, howitzers etc, you get the idea), or explosive devices.
 
Anyone who wants to practice aiming at a target can do that with a paint-ball gun. If you insist on using a lethal weapon it's to enhance your sad little life.
 
Anyone who wants to practice aiming at a target can do that with a paint-ball gun. If you insist on using a lethal weapon it's to enhance your sad little life.
Doesn't work that way. Recoil impulse and max effective range is different. Fail.
 
Can you name a point in human history that we weren't killing each other?
Is this the best you have, really? You're not making an impression with me.

Either you have the intellectual wherewithal to debate this, or you don't. So which is it?

I'm beginning to think the choice of your screen name was very apt.
 
Can you name a point in human history that we weren't killing each other?
The founding fathers never anticipated automatic weapons in the hands of 6 year olds in school houses committing attempted murder.

The "mah freedumbs!" take is an ignorant copout.
 
The founding fathers never anticipated automatic weapons in the hands of 6 year olds in school houses committing attempted murder.

The "mah freedumbs!" take is an ignorant copout.
6 year old with an automatic weapon!? Where did that happen?
 
Is this the best you have, really? You're not making an impression with me.

Either you have the intellectual wherewithal to debate this, or you don't. So which is it?

I'm beginning to think the choice of your screen name was very apt.
I've made an impression on you. You wouldn't reply if I hadn't. And making fun of account names is a show of "intellectual wherewithal "? Stellar reply. Just outright brilliant.
 
6 year old with an automatic weapon!? Where did that happen?
Right, that's what you took from my post. Semantics. Just gloss over the fact that a 6 year old try to murder his teacher in front of his classmates,
 
Right, that's what you took from my post. Semantics. Just gloss over the fact that a 6 year old try to murder his teacher in front of his classmates,
No, you lied and I'm calling you out on it. Also drawing attention to the fact you don't know what you're talking about. Then there is the fallacy behind you being anti-2A. Take your pick.
 
No, you lied and I'm calling you out on it. Also drawing attention to the fact you don't know what you're talking about. Then there is the fallacy behind you being anti-2A. Take your pick.
I didn't lie at all, learn your words. And again, I ask, where the fuck do you get that I'm anti-2A? That's an ascription and a blatant lie.
 
I didn't lie at all, learn your words. And again, I ask, where the fuck do you get that I'm anti-2A? That's an ascription and a blatant lie.
Yes, you did. You said a 6-year old with an automatic weapon tried to kill a teacher. Probably stems from your ignorance of the difference between automatic and semiautomatic. And based on the "mah freedoms"-bit, it's a safe assumption you are anti-2A.
 
I didn't lie at all, learn your words. And again, I ask, where the fuck do you get that I'm anti-2A? That's an ascription and a blatant lie.

Yes, you did. You said a 6-year old with an automatic weapon tried to kill a teacher. Probably stems from your ignorance of the difference between automatic and semiautomatic. And based on the "mah freedoms"-bit, it's a safe assumption you are anti-2A.
So DF just blanketly throws anti-gun and anti-2A around wherever they feel it's true.
 
Back
Top