Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, I did say guns could be used to kill people, but your assertion that that is all they are for is narrow minded and frankly ignorant. There are many sportsman like me that love to target shoot and have not ever pointed a gun at a human being, let alone shot, or killed anyone.Firearms as a concept were invented to kill people, a firearm that cannot kill someone is a rare thing. Try suggesting to the army that they re-arm with knives, hammers, baseball bats and drunk drivers, see how loudly they laugh.
Histrionics.NASA was devoted to putting payloads into space the size of nuclear devices to intimidate the Soviets.
We should simply walk away from the Space Program.
Right???
The Americas were discovered as part of Europe's constant squabbles and warfare*.
Abandon them too since they are "conflict continents?"
PS - What were bows, arrows and spears invented for?
David's sling???
* Not just militarily, but economic and religious too.
When was the last time you heard of a six-year-old successfully using a gun in self-defense?Those should be ignored. What you want is a report on kids getting guns and shooting people.
One of those is more important than a dozen successful self-defense shootings.
I guess this made some type of sense in your mind prior to posting it.So? Killing people is s human staple.
At this point in history, you are correct. However that was not the case a few hundred years ago. That is the point, the Fire Lance was designed to kill people. It was from this that all other firearm development began. So at any point it is disingenuous at best, out right lying at worse to state that firearms are designed for anything other than killing. In the modern world of today, some are better at killing people, others at killing prey. Some are really only good for making holes in targets,but still if they are used improperly, and they too can kill.Not true at all for all firearms.
I also never said that firearms are the only weapon that can kill. Why do people go off on these stupid childish diversions. Hell you can claim a puddle of water can kill, and you'd be correct,if you really wish to get that pedantic.Of course they can be used to kill people, but so can knives, hammers, baseball bats, and drunk drivers.
Hearing confessions?Well you must have some criminal tendencies yourself if they feel comfortable telling you about it! LOL
Can you name a point in human history that we weren't killing each other?I guess this made some type of sense in your mind prior to posting it.
Doesn't work that way. Recoil impulse and max effective range is different. Fail.Anyone who wants to practice aiming at a target can do that with a paint-ball gun. If you insist on using a lethal weapon it's to enhance your sad little life.
Is this the best you have, really? You're not making an impression with me.Can you name a point in human history that we weren't killing each other?
It’s part of your traditions? Ok, carry on murdering then.Can you name a point in human history that we weren't killing each other?
Humankind didn't need your permission to continue doing something that predates your 1st breath.It’s part of your traditions? Ok, carry on murdering then.
The founding fathers never anticipated automatic weapons in the hands of 6 year olds in school houses committing attempted murder.Can you name a point in human history that we weren't killing each other?
6 year old with an automatic weapon!? Where did that happen?The founding fathers never anticipated automatic weapons in the hands of 6 year olds in school houses committing attempted murder.
The "mah freedumbs!" take is an ignorant copout.
I've made an impression on you. You wouldn't reply if I hadn't. And making fun of account names is a show of "intellectual wherewithal "? Stellar reply. Just outright brilliant.Is this the best you have, really? You're not making an impression with me.
Either you have the intellectual wherewithal to debate this, or you don't. So which is it?
I'm beginning to think the choice of your screen name was very apt.
Right, that's what you took from my post. Semantics. Just gloss over the fact that a 6 year old try to murder his teacher in front of his classmates,6 year old with an automatic weapon!? Where did that happen?
No, you lied and I'm calling you out on it. Also drawing attention to the fact you don't know what you're talking about. Then there is the fallacy behind you being anti-2A. Take your pick.Right, that's what you took from my post. Semantics. Just gloss over the fact that a 6 year old try to murder his teacher in front of his classmates,
I didn't lie at all, learn your words. And again, I ask, where the fuck do you get that I'm anti-2A? That's an ascription and a blatant lie.No, you lied and I'm calling you out on it. Also drawing attention to the fact you don't know what you're talking about. Then there is the fallacy behind you being anti-2A. Take your pick.
Yes, you did. You said a 6-year old with an automatic weapon tried to kill a teacher. Probably stems from your ignorance of the difference between automatic and semiautomatic. And based on the "mah freedoms"-bit, it's a safe assumption you are anti-2A.I didn't lie at all, learn your words. And again, I ask, where the fuck do you get that I'm anti-2A? That's an ascription and a blatant lie.
I didn't lie at all, learn your words. And again, I ask, where the fuck do you get that I'm anti-2A? That's an ascription and a blatant lie.
So DF just blanketly throws anti-gun and anti-2A around wherever they feel it's true.Yes, you did. You said a 6-year old with an automatic weapon tried to kill a teacher. Probably stems from your ignorance of the difference between automatic and semiautomatic. And based on the "mah freedoms"-bit, it's a safe assumption you are anti-2A.
He tried.So DF just blanketly throws anti-gun and anti-2A around wherever they feel it's true.