Tucker Carlson hits a new low

[Rightguide]

Trust me, some of those swamp creatures going to prison means a whole hell of a lot to me!! It has nothing to do to Trump, it's about DOJ, FBI take an oath to support and defend the constitution, to protect and serve, not inject themselves into the election process or topple a sitting president.

I think Baker's testimony has frightened Sussman to the point of him possibly turning state's evidence to stay out of prison.

 

[icanhelp1]

Yes, I know that you believe the bullshit that 45 told you

Like I indicated earlier, has nothing to do with Trump, I know you believe the left should never be prosecuted because, we’ll, just because.

 

[Rightguide]

Like I indicated earlier, has nothing to do with Trump, I know you believe the left should never be prosecuted because, we’ll, just because.

I'm wondering if Durham's been limited to former government employees or private citizens but no sitting government employees. I guess we'll see if Jake Sullivan is called or indicted.

 

[pecksniff]

Trust me, some of those swamp creatures going to prison means a whole hell of a lot to me!!

The swamp creatures are in the Hamptons and Wall Street, not in DC.

 

[ll74]

Like I indicated earlier, has nothing to do with Trump, I know you believe the left should never be prosecuted because, we’ll, just because.

Sure it doesn't. There's no credible proof that Democrats cheated...yet you continue to lie and say there was....

 

[pecksniff]

IQ can't be considered without environmental influences

Not only the ones we all think of, but also epigenetics -- a factor which complicates the picture of hereditary characteristics as such.

 

[JohnEngelman]

I enjoy how we have to accept your terminology as part of your argument. Racialist...lmao

RACE, INTELLIGENCE, AND THE BRAIN: THE ERRORS AND OMISSIONS OF THE ‘REVISED’ EDITION OF S. J. GOULD’S THE MISMEASURE OF MAN (1996) J. Philippe Rushton Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario. London, Ontario N6A 5C2, Canada

Gould withholds from his readers that The Bell Curve is mainly an empirical work about the causes of social stratification and that it reached its conclusions only after fully analyzing a 12-year longitudinal study of 12,486 youths (3022 of whom were African-American), which showed that most 17-year-olds with high IQs (Blacks as well as Whites) went on to occupational success by their late 20s and early 30s whereas many of those with low IQs (both Black and White) went on to welfare dependency. The average IQ for African-Americans was found to be lower than those for Latino-, White-, Asian-, and Jewish-Americans (85, 89, 103, 106, and 115, respectively, pp. 273-278). Failure to mention these data fosters the false belief that IQ tests are not predictive and are biased in favor of North Europeans.

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.543.2771&rep=rep1&type=pdf

 

[Fuzzy1975]

SEE!!! YA did it again, you changed the fucking subject. You made it about you! you demented senile old bitty. Answer the fucking question!! We don't give two shits about your bile, but if you're going to inject yourself into the conversation then answer the damn question!!! LMFAO!

Triggered much today?

 

[ll74]

RACE, INTELLIGENCE, AND THE BRAIN: THE ERRORS AND OMISSIONS OF THE ‘REVISED’ EDITION OF S. J. GOULD’S THE MISMEASURE OF MAN (1996) J. Philippe Rushton Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario. London, Ontario N6A 5C2, Canada

Gould withholds from his readers that The Bell Curve is mainly an empirical work about the causes of social stratification and that it reached its conclusions only after fully analyzing a 12-year longitudinal study of 12,486 youths (3022 of whom were African-American), which showed that most 17-year-olds with high IQs (Blacks as well as Whites) went on to occupational success by their late 20s and early 30s whereas many of those with low IQs (both Black and White) went on to welfare dependency. The average IQ for African-Americans was found to be lower than those for Latino-, White-, Asian-, and Jewish-Americans (85, 89, 103, 106, and 115, respectively, pp. 273-278). Failure to mention these data fosters the false belief that IQ tests are not predictive and are biased in favor of North Europeans.

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.543.2771&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Non-sequitur ftw

 

[Fuzzy1975]

RACE, INTELLIGENCE, AND THE BRAIN: THE ERRORS AND OMISSIONS OF THE ‘REVISED’ EDITION OF S. J. GOULD’S THE MISMEASURE OF MAN (1996) J. Philippe Rushton Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario. London, Ontario N6A 5C2, Canada

Gould withholds from his readers that The Bell Curve is mainly an empirical work about the causes of social stratification and that it reached its conclusions only after fully analyzing a 12-year longitudinal study of 12,486 youths (3022 of whom were African-American), which showed that most 17-year-olds with high IQs (Blacks as well as Whites) went on to occupational success by their late 20s and early 30s whereas many of those with low IQs (both Black and White) went on to welfare dependency. The average IQ for African-Americans was found to be lower than those for Latino-, White-, Asian-, and Jewish-Americans (85, 89, 103, 106, and 115, respectively, pp. 273-278). Failure to mention these data fosters the false belief that IQ tests are not predictive and are biased in favor of North Europeans.

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.543.2771&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Non-sequitur ftw

Say what now?

https://retractionwatch.com/2020/12...-flawed-and-based-on-racist-ideas-and-agenda/

https://retractionwatch.com/2021/08...-flawed-and-based-on-racist-ideas-and-agenda/

 

[JohnEngelman]

Non-sequitur ftw

You do not prove that by asserting it.

 

[ll74]

You do not prove that by asserting it.

It was a non sequitur, which was an observation.

You really just can't think outside whatever debate rules bullshit you're stuck on, apparently.

 

[ll74]

View attachment 2150064
It is reasonable to assume that upper class black parents provide their children with a better environment than lower middle class white parents. Nevertheless lower middle class white students average a higher mean score on the SAT than upper class black students. This is because of a well understood genetic phenomenon called "regression to the mean." Gene alleles for exceptional characteristics are likely to be recessive, and unmatched in the children of exceptional parents. Because the mean IQ for Negroes is quite a bit lower than it is for whites, black children experience more of a regression.

That doesn't change my statement or refute it in the slightest, cupcake

 

[JohnEngelman]

It was a non sequitur, which was an observation.

You really just can't think outside whatever debate rules bullshit you're stuck on, apparently.

How was it a non sequitur?

 

[JohnEngelman]

That doesn't change my statement or refute it in the slightest, cupcake

It certainly does, because it is proof that gene alleles are more important than environment. This in turn is the reason that efforts to improve black academic performance have been disappointing, just as Professor Arthur Jensen predicted in 1969 in his essay in the Harvard Educational Review.

 

[pecksniff]

Like I indicated earlier, has nothing to do with Trump, I know you believe the left should never be prosecuted because, we’ll, just because.

Nobody being prosecuted or considered for prosecution here has anything to do with the left. The left =/= the Democrats.

 

[ll74]

It certainly does, because it is proof that gene alleles are more important than environment. This in turn is the reason that efforts to improve black academic performance have been disappointing, just as Professor Arthur Jensen predicted in 1969 in his essay in the Harvard Educational Review.

No, it doesn't. And no, it isnt.

 

[ll74]

How was it a non sequitur?

You comment was unrelated to mine. I was discussing your requirement that others accept the word "oriental" because to you it makes sense.

Nobody needs to accept anything you say, cupcake.

 

[JohnEngelman]

You comment was unrelated to mine. I was discussing your requirement that others accept the word "oriental" because to you it makes sense.

Nobody needs to accept anything you say, cupcake.

I was demonstrating the high average intelligence of Orientals. My assertions are well documented and calmly asserted. Yours are emotional, and lacking in content.

 

[ll74]

It certainly does, because it is proof that gene alleles are more important than environment. This in turn is the reason that efforts to improve black academic performance have been disappointing, just as Professor Arthur Jensen predicted in 1969 in his essay in the Harvard Educational Review.

Overall, your major problem is that you believe that other people must provide data that refutes your arguments. The problem is that your interpretation of the data is flawed from top to bottom. You make conclusions from incomplete data or data taken out of context. And since you're a fucking idiot, you double down or ignore when people call you out on it. Because you're so entranced in your own bullshit that you can't see outside of the copypasta and conclusions you've made.

Because of this, every time you're faced with a logical argument refuting it, using the rest of the context around the evidence you've presented....you dismiss it. And so people insult you...because you deserve to be insulted.

Maybe go outside and meet a black person. Hear what they have to say about your bullshit and actually listen...instead of just throwing up your copypasta shield which you've become comfortable with online. You won't ..but you should ...it would probably help you.

 

[ll74]

I was demonstrating the high average intelligence of Orientals. My assertions are well documented and calmly asserted. Yours are emotional, and lacking in content.

Yes....you were called out for using a stupid word that doesn't really exist...and you tell everyone that it's cool because of why you use it instead of just not using it.

But the non Sequitur was because your comment was unrealted to mine.

 

[icanhelp1]

Nobody being prosecuted or considered for prosecution here has anything to do with the left. The left =/= the Democrats.

 

[icanhelp1]

Nobody being prosecuted or considered for prosecution here has anything to do with the left. The left =/= the Democrats.

Just for shits and giggles, my simple interpretation of left and right as understood by the general electorate is left for liberal/blue and right for conservative/ red. Most people associate the left with democrats and the right with republicans so, for simplicity sake, let's say you just go along with the spirit of the conversation OK! Left for liberal Right for republican and try not to dig too deep into the ideological nuances of the true left.

 

[pecksniff]

Just for shits and giggles, my simple interpretation of left and right as understood by the general electorate is left for liberal/blue and right for conservative/ red. Most people associate the left with democrats and the right with republicans so, for simplicity sake, let's say you just go along with the spirit of the conversation OK! Left for liberal Right for republican and try not to dig too deep into the ideological nuances of the true left.

It's not a matter of nuance. It's institutional. There is a real American left, and it is to the left of the Democrats and in some circumstances hostile to them. That is an important distinction. It is essential not to confuse or conflate the two.

 

[icanhelp1]

It's not a matter of nuance. It's institutional. There is a real American left, and it is to the left of the Democrats. That is an important distinction.

I understand there is a left of the democrat party just like there is a right to the republican party. For the sake of this argument the left is a distinction without a difference.