Tucker Carlson hits a new low

There are data sets out there that just can't be ignored. To deny shit exist doesn't make them go away. There are issues of black on black violence in cities like Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit and it won't go away by calling anyone who bring up the facts as racist or a white supremacist.
In case you didn't notice, this discussion I am having with Johnny is NOT about the US. It is about the non problems others have with this racial group of humans in first world countries outside of the US. Stick to the topic.
 
I disagree. I believe diversity is a strength, and it always has been. The problem is that, somehow, people have lost the ability to cope and so have taken refuge in raw tribalism. The internet has not helped these people. It has allowed them to find like minded people to unite with for the most outrageous ideas and given them the impression that their knowledge and understanding of everything is just as complete as the people who were formerly recognized experts in their fields.
Of course I also recognize that I tend to be optimistic. That element was always there, too.
 
I don't pay attention to twitter but reading some of the looney bullshit you peddle here on LIT I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that you do?
Well from what I understand his ratings far surpass anything CNN or MSDNC have to offer.

The Great Replacement Theory is the fresh steamy bullshit you lefty's are throwing against the wall now?
Ratings, i fear, are no judge of anything except that they determine how much a host can charge for advertising. It just means people are watching and can be plied with urges to buy stuff. I don’t watch CNN, MSNBC, FOX, or any other 24 hour “news” service. They spend too much time on mind control, real life mind control, because there really isn’t THAT much news to tell. If you don’t believe that, get a stopwatch and time them. There are lots of times when they are just sitting around shooting the breeze about what happened and the continuous repetition has an affect. Just tell me what happened. I can draw my own conclusions about it. (Sorry for the rant. Not mad at you. Mad at ALL of them.)
 
Genetically, diversity is our strength. Any dog or horse breeder will tell you about "hybrid vigor," and the rude health of mongrels, and the health problems of pedigrees and thoroughbreds.
 
I disagree. I believe diversity is a strength, and it always has been. The problem is that, somehow, people have lost the ability to cope and so have taken refuge in raw tribalism. The internet has not helped these people. It has allowed them to find like minded people to unite with for the most outrageous ideas and given them the impression that their knowledge and understanding of everything is just as complete as the people who were formerly recognized experts in their fields.
What you are saying is that diversity is a strength under ideal conditions that have never existed. I am pointing out that diversity is a weakness under conditions that actually exist, and always have. Racial and ethnic animosities have always existed. The internet did not begin them.
 
What you are saying is that diversity is a strength under ideal conditions that have never existed. I am pointing out that diversity is a weakness under conditions that actually exist, and always have. Racial and ethnic animosities have always existed. The internet did not begin them.
Murder and rape and arson have always existed. So what?
 
What you are saying is that diversity is a strength under ideal conditions that have never existed. I am pointing out that diversity is a weakness under conditions that actually exist, and always have. Racial and ethnic animosities have always existed. The internet did not begin them.
Well, make a choice because that is essentially what it is: surrender and let entrope take over because perfection does not exist in this world, or refuse to accept that things cannot be better If everyone just listens and is committed to help. 🤷🏼‍♀️ ☺️ I didn’t say or intend to say that the internet began tribalism, but it has certainly magnified it WAY out of proportion with reality.
 
He isn't a racist for bringing up crime data.
There is nothing wrong with data. It cannot be ignored. But it is the USE of the data that is at issue. the guy under discussion makes his living making people angry or frightened about something because that keeps them engaged and contributing to revenue. the purpose he has for using the data is not to help make things better but to stir up and justify prejudices that people already have for the high ratings and the money that brings in. Data that identify problems can be helpful if it contributes to a positive solution but just as damaging if all it does is drill and drill on the problem. Drilling on a problem is so easy. Fixing a problem requires hope, creativity, and work. Tucker and his ilk are all about easy money. That, I think, is the real bottom line.
 
Last edited:
There is nothing wrong with data. It cannot be ignored. But it is the USE of the data that is at issue. the guy under discussion makes his living making people angry or frightened about something because that keeps them engaged and contributing to revenue. the purpose he has for using the data is not to help make things better but to stir up and justify prejudices that people already have for the high ratings and the money that brings in. Data that identify problems can be helpful if it contributes to a positive solution but just as damaging if all it does is drill and drill on the problem. Drilling on a problem is so easy. Fixing a problem requires hope, creativity, and work. Tucker and his ilk are all about easy money. That, I think, is the real bottom line.
Misappropriation is never a good thing
 
Hispanics in Latin America are descended from immigrants from Spain and Portugal. There’s nothing “third world” about them.
The Hispanics who migrate to the United States illegally are largely American Indian. American Indians have higher crime rates than whites, because they have had less association with the eugenic effects of civilization.
 
There is nothing wrong with data. It cannot be ignored. But it is the USE of the data that is at issue. the guy under discussion makes his living making people angry or frightened about something because that keeps them engaged and contributing to revenue. the purpose he has for using the data is not to help make things better but to stir up and justify prejudices that people already have for the high ratings and the money that brings in. Data that identify problems can be helpful if it contributes to a positive solution but just as damaging if all it does is drill and drill on the problem. Drilling on a problem is so easy. Fixing a problem requires hope, creativity, and work. Tucker and his ilk are all about easy money. That, I think, is the real bottom line.
Tucker Carlson would argue, and I agree, that blaming black social pathology on white racism encourages more black social pathology. One cannot deny that black rates of crime and illegitimacy have risen since 1964, when the Civil Rights Act was signed into law, and the War on Poverty was declared.
 
Genetically, diversity is our strength. Any dog or horse breeder will tell you about "hybrid vigor," and the rude health of mongrels, and the health problems of pedigrees and thoroughbreds.
Actually that is a whole debate in the dog world.
Because I am a white Gentile who praises Jews and Orientals white nationalists call me a race traitor.
Sticks and stones… 🌺
Misappropriation is never a good thing
It is for snake oil salesmen.
 
The Hispanics who migrate to the United States illegally are largely American Indian. American Indians have higher crime rates than whites, because they have had less association with the eugenic effects of civilization.
Native Americans are genetically Asian, which blows up your theory completely.
 
Tucker Carlson would argue, and I agree, that blaming black social pathology on white racism encourages more black social pathology. One cannot deny that black rates of crime and illegitimacy have risen since 1964, when the Civil Rights Act was signed into law, and the War on Poverty was declared.
So that makes them a bad thing? I would actually have no desire to argue with Tucker. It is what he wants. There are also more gifted black public servants, artists, lawyers, doctors, teachers, businesspeople, veterinarians, professionals of all kinds. So Rome wasn’t built in a day. It is a process.
 
Well, make a choice because that is essentially what it is: surrender and let entrope take over because perfection does not exist in this world, or refuse to accept that things cannot be better If everyone just listens and is committed to help. 🤷🏼‍♀️ ☺️ I didn’t say or intend to say that the internet began tribalism, but it has certainly magnified it WAY out of proportion with reality.
You are confirming my earlier argument that you are claiming that diversity would be a strength under ideal circumstances, under conditions that have rarely existed. Diversity can only be considered a strength if we are diversified with a race characterized by intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy.

For an upper middle class liberal diversity is a Chinese American family living next door, where the son attends MIT, and the daughter studies classical ballet. It is dining in Thai and Ethiopian restaurants in safe neighborhoods.

For a white blue collar worker diversity is having attended a black majority public school; it is losing jobs because of affirmative action; it is being the victim of black criminals.
 
So that makes them a bad thing? I would actually have no desire to argue with Tucker. It is what he wants. There are also more gifted black public servants, artists, lawyers, doctors, teachers, businesspeople, veterinarians, professionals of all kinds. So Rome wasn’t built in a day. It is a process.
Heck I was very surprised to learn the other day that Elon Musk is part African American, the guy that gave us independence from Russian involvement in the Space Lab, much to Putin’s annoyance.
 
So that makes them a bad thing? I would actually have no desire to argue with Tucker. It is what he wants. There are also more gifted black public servants, artists, lawyers, doctors, teachers, businesspeople, veterinarians, professionals of all kinds. So Rome wasn’t built in a day. It is a process.
To be even marginally able to perform adequately as a professional or a manager one needs an IQ of at least 115. The following chart demonstrates that a very small percentage of blacks are that intelligent.

View attachment 2150031

You are implying that Tucker Carlson should be censored. I think that for too many years there have been too many restrictions against criticizing high rates of black crime and illegitimacy.
 
You are confirming my earlier argument that you are claiming that diversity would be a strength under ideal circumstances, under conditions that have rarely existed. Diversity can only be considered a strength if we are diversified with a race characterized by intelligence, obedience to the law, and monogamy.

For an upper middle class liberal diversity is a Chinese American family living next door, where the son attends MIT, and the daughter studies classical ballet. It is dining in Thai and Ethiopian restaurants in safe neighborhoods.

For a white blue collar worker diversity is having attended a black majority public school; it is losing jobs because of affirmative action; it is being the victim of black criminals.
i didn’t confirm anything. It kind of drives me crazy how people do that. I don’t know if I am an upper middle class liberal or not, but my orthopedic surgeon is black. Great guy and his kid is too. 😁
 
Censorable or not, I hope we can all agree Carlson is wrong. There is no conspiracy to replace white Americans with nonwhites, nor natives with non-natives.
 
To be even marginally able to perform adequately as a professional or a manager one needs an IQ of at least 115. The following chart demonstrates that a very small percentage of blacks are that intelligent.

View attachment 2150031

You are implying that Tucker Carlson should be censored. I think that for too many years there have been too many restrictions against criticizing high rates of black crime and illegitimacy.
Tucker has to be somewhere in the lower echelon. How do you think IQ is assessed?
 
Back
Top