Left targets justices' homes

Can you post a web address to Professor Jensen's statement? I think it is likely that he did say that, and that he said it under duress. His more recent statement does not explain why his earlier statement has been verified by subsequent events.
"Duress"?!
 
I guess you really believe that 45 beat Biden even though Biden received the most votes in history. Why are you fuck a gottdamn fucking dumbfuck partisan dipshit?
No, what I believe is that Biden is a centrist. A leftist would have had a harder time beating Trump.
 
Are they waving guns and intimidating people going in and out? If not, they probably aren't gun nut Republicans, so it's just folks exercising free speech.

You board Trumpettes live in the world of deep hypocrisy.
You must be a dumb bolshevic to talk of hypocrisy. I hope you like gas at 5 bucks agallon and milk at 5 bucks too.
 
I guess you really believe that 45 beat Biden even though Biden received the most votes in history. Why are you fuck a gottdamn fucking dumbfuck partisan dipshit?
dumbfuck? you really have a magnificent vocabulary. Biden did win the lection though because of stuffed ballot boxes, election fraud and a biasssed media. Trump will be back and he will get 100 million votes and the bolshevic will get 50 million from pricks like you.
 
dumbfuck? you really have a magnificent vocabulary. Biden did win the lection though because of stuffed ballot boxes, election fraud and a biasssed media. Trump will be back and he will get 100 million votes and the bolshevic will get 50 million from pricks like you.
Biden won because he won the electoral vote. Bonus - he also won the popular vote
 
dumbfuck? you really have a magnificent vocabulary. Biden did win the lection though because of stuffed ballot boxes, election fraud and a biasssed media. Trump will be back and he will get 100 million votes and the bolshevic will get 50 million from pricks like you.
The only election fraud has been in favor of the orange retard and President Biden won both the electoral and popular vote. 45 already said he wasn't running in 2024 and he would be 77 years old if he ran. Who is this "bolshevic?" Pro-tip: Quit getting your narrative from the dipshits at FoxNews and learn some shit before you post your short-bus ramblings.
 
Can you post a web address to Professor Jensen's statement? I think it is likely that he did say that, and that he said it under duress. His more recent statement does not explain why his earlier statement has been verified by subsequent events.
No I am not posting a web address!

You go research this yourself, you are the one propagating it (lies and discredited papers), and yet you obviously don't have all the information...sounds to me as if your research is coming up short....you best revisit it.
 
No I am not posting a web address!

You go research this yourself, you are the one propagating it (lies and discredited papers), and yet you obviously don't have all the information...sounds to me as if your research is coming up short....you best revisit it.
I document my assertions. You have the obligation to document your assertions.
 
I document my assertions. You have the obligation to document your assertions.
I did, I quoted the fucker, if you don't believe the quote, try google, you racist piece of shit. It's not difficult, type his name in the search engine, and see what comes up. Unless you don't want the answer, because it sinks another of your foundation blocks upon which rests your ideological racism.
 
I did, I quoted the fucker, if you don't believe the quote, try google, you racist piece of shit. It's not difficult, type his name in the search engine, and see what comes up. Unless you don't want the answer, because it sinks another of your foundation blocks upon which rests your ideological racism.
Jensen's 1998 The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability gives his position suggesting a genetic component is implicated in the white-black difference in IQ:

In Chapter 12: Population Differences in g: Causal Hypotheses, Jensen writes: "The relationship of the g factor to a number of biological variables and its relationship to the size of the white-black differences on various cognitive tests (i.e., Spearman's hypothesis) suggests that the average white-black difference in g has a biological component. Human races are viewed not as discrete, or Platonic, categories, but rather as breeding populations that, as a result of natural selection, have come to differ statistically in the relative frequencies of many polymorphic genes. The genetic distances between various populations form a continuous variable that can be measured in terms of differences in gene frequencies. Racial populations differ in many genetic characteristics, some of which, such as brain size, have behavioral and psychometric correlates, particularly g."
In 1994 he was one of 52 signatories on "Mainstream Science on Intelligence," an editorial written by Linda Gottfredson and published in the Wall Street Journal, which defended the findings on race and intelligence in The Bell Curve. [9]

In 1995 an American Psychological Association task force published a paper titled "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns" which concluded that within the white population the heritability of IQ is "around .75" but also " It is sometimes suggested that the Black/ White differential in psychometric intelligence is partly due to genetic differences (Jensen, 1972).
https://www.bionity.com/en/encyclopedia/Arthur_Jensen.html
 
It has also been suggested that any measured difference in recorded IQs is caused by the IQ test being designed by white researchers, based on white experiences. In an IQ test designed to test black life experiences, not surprisingly whites scored far lower and blacks much better.

IQ tests are a very crude indicator.
 
The protestor's are finding themselves being dox'ed now and they are devastated. Poor babies.
 
I fear that eventually they will work themselves into harm: property, maybe even people.
(Especially if the ruling comes out against their Holy Sacrament.
They just might explode in overwrought outrage.)

But it won't be "their" fault, it will be just a few unassociated crazies or Republican plants.
This administration, or the State of Virginia, should step up and enforce their laws
which I outlined in an earlier post. This must be stopped before everyone
ends up resorting to finger pointing and denial...
 
People upset about bad behavior promoting bad behavior in response is basically why we're dealing with this shit to begin with.
 
It has also been suggested that any measured difference in recorded IQs is caused by the IQ test being designed by white researchers, based on white experiences. In an IQ test designed to test black life experiences, not surprisingly whites scored far lower and blacks much better.

IQ tests are a very crude indicator.
I've been over that with him and his answer is basically that if African Americans were smart enough they'd learn to be white. Which is the American way mind you.
 
The only election fraud has been in favor of the orange retard and President Biden won both the electoral and popular vote. 45 already said he wasn't running in 2024 and he would be 77 years old if he ran. Who is this "bolshevic?" Pro-tip: Quit getting your narrative from the dipshits at FoxNews and learn some shit before you post your short-bus ramblings.
Im sure you read NYT and Wapo for your fake news when you read, or listen to CNN and MSNBC for the hard news....Good luck in your fantasy land and enjoy your crappy existence under bolshevic rule. Pravda is alive and well in y our brain.
 
Im sure you read NYT and Wapo for your fake news when you read, or listen to CNN and MSNBC for the hard news....Good luck in your fantasy land and enjoy your crappy existence under bolshevic rule. Pravda is alive and well in y our brain.
I don't waste my precious time with any of them. Nor Fox, qOAN, Breitbart, or InfoWars, dipshit.
HE got 24 million votes more than Obama, dont you wonder how that happened?
Hillary beat 45 by millions on the popular. Your "arguments" are that of a mentally challenged toddler.
 
Jensen's 1998 The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability gives his position suggesting a genetic component is implicated in the white-black difference in IQ:

In Chapter 12: Population Differences in g: Causal Hypotheses, Jensen writes: "The relationship of the g factor to a number of biological variables and its relationship to the size of the white-black differences on various cognitive tests (i.e., Spearman's hypothesis) suggests that the average white-black difference in g has a biological component. Human races are viewed not as discrete, or Platonic, categories, but rather as breeding populations that, as a result of natural selection, have come to differ statistically in the relative frequencies of many polymorphic genes. The genetic distances between various populations form a continuous variable that can be measured in terms of differences in gene frequencies. Racial populations differ in many genetic characteristics, some of which, such as brain size, have behavioral and psychometric correlates, particularly g."
In 1994 he was one of 52 signatories on "Mainstream Science on Intelligence," an editorial written by Linda Gottfredson and published in the Wall Street Journal, which defended the findings on race and intelligence in The Bell Curve. [9]

In 1995 an American Psychological Association task force published a paper titled "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns" which concluded that within the white population the heritability of IQ is "around .75" but also " It is sometimes suggested that the Black/ White differential in psychometric intelligence is partly due to genetic differences (Jensen, 1972).
https://www.bionity.com/en/encyclopedia/Arthur_Jensen.html
So you can't do a simple google search...

WHY

WE

KNOW

WHY

Here is the search, showing his quote, withdrawing the assertions around his papers and books....you are the worst type of Racist on the planet. The one who uses published racial works, irregardless of if they have been discredited, and then you carry the facade of claiming I am not racist, since I have ethnic friends, but I also know they are inferior to me, as these paper published prove.

https://books.google.ca/books?id=lHuskqZZyOYC&pg=PA50&lpg=PA50&dq="nowhere+have+I+"claimed"+an+"innate+deficiency"+of+intelligence+in+blacks.+My+position+on+this+question+is+clearly+spelled+out+in+my+most+recent+book:+"The+plain+fact+is+that+at+present+there+exists+no+scientifically+satisfactory+explanation+for+the+differences+between+the+IQ+distributions+in+the+black+and+white+populations.+The+only+genuine+consensus+among+well-informed+scientists+on+this+topic+is+that+the+cause+of+the+difference+remains+an+open+qu&source=bl&ots=JjWTiQM7_i&sig=ACfU3U0lZavQ_q0oZrXhu_fbXHab3y9iqQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiWu5vpotr3AhU1AzQIHaLGCxoQ6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&q="nowhere have I "claimed" an "innate deficiency" of intelligence in blacks. My position on this question is clearly spelled out in my most recent book: "The plain fact is that at present there exists no scientifically satisfactory explanation for the differences between the IQ distributions in the black and white populations. The only genuine consensus among well-informed scientists on this topic is that the cause of the difference remains an open qu&f=false
 
So you can't do a simple google search...

WHY

WE

KNOW

WHY

Here is the search, showing his quote, withdrawing the assertions around his papers and books....you are the worst type of Racist on the planet. The one who uses published racial works, irregardless of if they have been discredited, and then you carry the facade of claiming I am not racist, since I have ethnic friends, but I also know they are inferior to me, as these paper published prove.

https://books.google.ca/books?id=lHuskqZZyOYC&pg=PA50&lpg=PA50&dq="nowhere+have+I+"claimed"+an+"innate+deficiency"+of+intelligence+in+blacks.+My+position+on+this+question+is+clearly+spelled+out+in+my+most+recent+book:+"The+plain+fact+is+that+at+present+there+exists+no+scientifically+satisfactory+explanation+for+the+differences+between+the+IQ+distributions+in+the+black+and+white+populations.+The+only+genuine+consensus+among+well-informed+scientists+on+this+topic+is+that+the+cause+of+the+difference+remains+an+open+qu&source=bl&ots=JjWTiQM7_i&sig=ACfU3U0lZavQ_q0oZrXhu_fbXHab3y9iqQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiWu5vpotr3AhU1AzQIHaLGCxoQ6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&q="nowhere have I "claimed" an "innate deficiency" of intelligence in blacks. My position on this question is clearly spelled out in my most recent book: "The plain fact is that at present there exists no scientifically satisfactory explanation for the differences between the IQ distributions in the black and white populations. The only genuine consensus among well-informed scientists on this topic is that the cause of the difference remains an open qu&f=false
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. When it comes to evidence that durable average racial differences in intelligence are genetic it is evidence of the kind of harassment Professor Arthur Jensen suffered after his essay was published in The Harvard Educational Review.

---------

Cambridge Brain Sciences, 22 Genes Have Been Linked to Intelligence

Research into genetics has become amazingly advanced in recent years, and a new study has identified the genes involved in intelligence. The researchers analyzed intelligence test scores and the complete genomes of over 78,000 people. Let me underscore how incredible that is; ten or fifteen years ago, studying the DNA of one person, let alone 78,000, would have been impractical. Now scientists can use this wealth of data to find the specific arrangements of molecules that code for differences in the brain. The 22 genes implicated in intelligence made sense, too—they were genes previously shown to be involved in regulating the growth of neurons, for example.

https://www.cambridgebrainsciences....e is no one “IQ,genomes of over 78,000 people.

---------

The discovery of IQ genes has just begun. It continues despite the sanctions and taboos imposed by those who fear the political implications. I am confident that as more gene alleles are discovered that contribute to high intelligence it will also be discovered that these alleles are more likely to be discovered in members of some races than members of other races.
 
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. When it comes to evidence that durable average racial differences in intelligence are genetic it is evidence of the kind of harassment Professor Arthur Jensen suffered after his essay was published in The Harvard Educational Review.

---------

Cambridge Brain Sciences, 22 Genes Have Been Linked to Intelligence

Research into genetics has become amazingly advanced in recent years, and a new study has identified the genes involved in intelligence. The researchers analyzed intelligence test scores and the complete genomes of over 78,000 people. Let me underscore how incredible that is; ten or fifteen years ago, studying the DNA of one person, let alone 78,000, would have been impractical. Now scientists can use this wealth of data to find the specific arrangements of molecules that code for differences in the brain. The 22 genes implicated in intelligence made sense, too—they were genes previously shown to be involved in regulating the growth of neurons, for example.

https://www.cambridgebrainsciences.com/more/articles/22-genes-have-been-linked-to-intelligence#:~:text=There is no one “IQ,genomes of over 78,000 people.

---------

The discovery of IQ genes has just begun. It continues despite the sanctions and taboos imposed by those who fear the political implications. I am confident that as more gene alleles are discovered that contribute to high intelligence it will also be discovered that these alleles are more likely to be discovered in members of some races than members of other races.
*chuckles* Keep telling yourself this....it is the only thing that separates you from the white hat, cross burning folk.,
 
*chuckles* Keep telling yourself this....it is the only thing that separates you from the white hat, cross burning folk.,
Yours is an example of the guilt by association fallacy. In the guilt by association fallacy one associates the person one is arguing with with a group of people most people dislike.
 
Yours is an example of the guilt by association fallacy. In the guilt by association fallacy one associates the person one is arguing with with a group of people most people dislike.
No you are guilty by your own assertion. I am not the one peddling in discredited papers, or failing see that authors have put out statements "clarifying " there publishing.

You are.

I have asked you to show me any accredited University, or College that offers a course, credit, diploma or degree, that follows on any of J. Phillipe Rushton's works. You have supplied zero. Which is great, because that means, after you die, there will be one less person supporting their racism, on his papers.
 
Back
Top