Left targets justices' homes

[YDB95]

Calling someone a racist does not advance the dialogue on race we need to have; it is an attempt to suppress the discussion by those who know that they cannot defend what they pretend to believe in a debate where facts matter, and insults and name calling are forbidden.

The same goes for posting junk science again and again that ostensibly shows blacks are inherently dumber than whites.

 

[JohnEngelman]

The same goes for posting junk science again and again that ostensibly shows blacks are inherently dumber than whites.

Yawn.

 

[pecksniff]

I have never claimed absolute differences, only average differences.

Doesn't matter, you are still making unsupported claims about heredity. And, no, cranks like Rushton and Jensen are no support.

 

[Sh1ne0n67]

Well we don't really know much about this yet, about who's doing it, etc.,
and that's even when virulently non-MAGA people are telling us that no churches were harmed,
i.e., Where's the proof, show me the proof, there is no proof!
The bombing of the pro-life people, well, there are a lot of crazies out there and
most of them are MAGA and you know hoe violent those nuts are.
It's not Democrats picketing and protesting the homes of Federal judges, don't say it's the Left
you can even really blame the pro-choice movement, because remember, these are MAGA judges
so as far as you know this is just AntiFa fighting and protesting that Fascist Judiciary.
We do know that it was a perfectly peaceful protest because despite the law no one is being arrested
no one is even calling for Justice justice, it's not like it's a 1/6 insurrection here.
Who knows, it's probably the Oath Keepers trying to keep their Judges in line.

But I'm with Ogg now on this one, the MSM and Psaki have shamed me and convinced me
that this is not the Left or Democrats; they are the hapless (imaginary) victims here because
the Right which truly exists and is crazier than bat guano needs to have a Boogey Man to rail against
and create an atmosphere of fear (and to bring back slavery, or at least Jim Crow, not to mention,
putting women in their place, barefoot and pregnant and shoving gay people into closets...,).

 

[Sh1ne0n67]

Who knows if it was an organized event or just a group of people out for a walk...?

AT THIS POINT, WHAT DOES IT MATTER???

 

[ll74]

Do you smell burnt toast? May want to call 911

 

[Sh1ne0n67]

Psaki said the president did not condone the violence.

“We know the passion, we understand the passion, we understand the concern,” she said, referring to the perpetrators and their apparent support for legal abortion.

Of course, they understood the 1/6 passion...

:nods:

 

[ll74]

Yes, the Jan 6 passion based on complete lies.

 

[Rotadom]

Psaki said the president did not condone the violence.

What violence, Stroke?

 

[Sh1ne0n67]

That's right. Already said that. It's imaginary violence and Jen was intimidated
by MAGA violence to tell a lie and keep them calm. It never happened,
there is no proof whatsoever. I'm watching CBS and they
haven't mentioned it once (or the protests).

 

[Sh1ne0n67]

This puts a smile on my face:

.@Reuters interviewed 21 women in a contested electoral area in the northern suburbs of Phoenix after news of the Supreme Court draft ruling broke. Most of the women said inflation, not abortion, was the galvanizing issue for them https://reut.rs/3MXU3zu

Let's Go Brandon!

"I did that."
_________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).

 

[Sh1ne0n67]

https://www.reuters.com/legal/gover...-hoping-galvanize-voters-abortion-2022-05-09/

 

[ll74]

The turnout for midterms usually skews older.

The abortion issue will change that dynamic, which is the biggest impact the ruling will have.

 

[Sh1ne0n67]

No it won't.

It's the economy Stupid!
_________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).

 

[ll74]

No it won't.

It's the economy Stupid!
_________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).

Maybe check out voter turnout for midterms.... specifically the age groups increase/decrease

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1096379/voter-turnout-midterms-by-age-historical/

 

[ll74]

Probably nothing

https://news.gallup.com/poll/246206/abortion-trends-age.aspx

 

[Wrong Element]

This sudden belief in a right to privacy is interesting.

 

[Rightguide]

Almost everything in American politics is right or center. There is a left, but it really only exists to the left of the Democrats, and is mostly marginal. Not even Bernie Sanders really ran on "socialism" -- he might call himself a socialist, but he is really only a left-progressive, what in other countries would be called a social democrat -- wants a vigorous welfare state and redistributive taxation, but not to nationalize all means of production. There are real American socialists, but they are even more marginal than Sanders and there are none in Congress and very few in office at lower levels.

This is Peck reimagining reality and the need to legitimize his long-held communist ideology and the quiet need to deny the existence of its spreading influence in the Democrat Party.

 

[Sean Renaud]

No that is Peck speaking the Truth, we don't actually have anything that could honestly be called Left.

 

[pecksniff]

This is Peck reimagining reality and the need to legitimize his long-held communist ideology and the quiet need to deny the existence of its spreading influence in the Democrat Party.

There is no spreading communist ideology in the Democratic Party. (There might be some in the Democrat Party, whatever that may be.)

 

[JohnEngelman]

Doesn't matter, you are still making unsupported claims about heredity. And, no, cranks like Rushton and Jensen are no support.

Professor J. Philippe Rushton presented plausible genetic explanations for the durable racial differences I have documented several times on this forum.

ttp://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm

His well documented assertions have been denounced. They have never been disproved.

Professor Arthur Jensen did more than present realities that were not in dispute when he wrote; he predicted the future. "How Much Can We Boost IQ and Achievement?" is a 1969 article by Arthur Jensen published in the Harvard Educational Review. In this article professor Jensen predicted that little could be done. The following chard demonstrates that little has been achieved, despite enormous expense:

View attachment 2147726
The chart does not seem to have been adjusted for inflation, but from 1970 to 2010 there was not 185% inflation.

After Professor Jensen's article was published his classes at Berkeley were interrupted by new left radicals. He received death threats. Sometimes he required police protection. Nevertheless, time has verified his predictions. The fact that anti racists try to suppress arguments like this persuades me that the arguments are valid, but anti racists fear the political implications of the arguments.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Almost everything in American politics is right or center. There is a left, but it really only exists to the left of the Democrats, and is mostly marginal. Not even Bernie Sanders really ran on "socialism" -- he might call himself a socialist, but he is really only a left-progressive, what in other countries would be called a social democrat -- wants a vigorous welfare state and redistributive taxation, but not to nationalize all means of production. There are real American socialists, but they are even more marginal than Sanders and there are none in Congress and very few in office at lower levels.



This is Peck reimagining reality and the need to legitimize his long-held communist ideology and the quiet need to deny the existence of its spreading influence in the Democrat Party.

What is "communist ideology?" The writings of Karl Marx have influenced many liberals. That does not mean that they are Marxist ideologues. One should read a political thinker for insight, rather than doctrine. Human behavior and human nature are too complex and unpredictable for a single theory to explain everything.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Professor J. Philippe Rushton presented plausible genetic explanations for the durable racial differences I have documented several times on this forum.

ttp://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm

His well documented assertions have been denounced. They have never been disproved.

Professor Arthur Jensen did more than present realities that were not in dispute when he wrote; he predicted the future. "How Much Can We Boost IQ and Achievement?" is a 1969 article by Arthur Jensen published in the Harvard Educational Review. In this article professor Jensen predicted that little could be done. The following chard demonstrates that little has been achieved, despite enormous expense:

View attachment 2147726
The chart does not seem to have been adjusted for inflation, but from 1970 to 2010 there was not 185% inflation.

After Professor Jensen's article was published his classes at Berkeley were interrupted by new left radicals. He received death threats. Sometimes he required police protection. Nevertheless, time has verified his predictions. The fact that anti racists try to suppress arguments like this persuades me that the arguments are valid, but anti racists fear the political implications of the arguments.

And you bring into the fold another discredited person, but, since he reinforces your particular views, its all good...btw this is what Jensen said to "clear up" the "misunderstanding" of his work....

"nowhere have I "claimed" an "innate deficiency" of intelligence in blacks. My position on this question is clearly spelled out in my most recent book: "The plain fact is that at present there exists no scientifically satisfactory explanation for the differences between the IQ distributions in the black and white populations. The only genuine consensus among well-informed scientists on this topic is that the cause of the difference remains an open question."

In other words, he acknowledges, but doesn't admit to the cause being "environmental" differences.

 

[pecksniff]

What is "communist ideology?" The writings of Karl Marx have influenced many liberals. That does not mean that they are Marxist ideologues. One should read a political thinker for insight, rather than doctrine. Human behavior and human nature are too complex and unpredictable for a single theory to explain everything.

Well, the problem there is that Marx has kind of been spoiled by Communists in power, who treat Marxism as doctrine.

 

[JohnEngelman]

And you bring into the fold another discredited person, but, since he reinforces your particular views, its all good...btw this is what Jensen said to "clear up" the "misunderstanding" of his work....

"nowhere have I "claimed" an "innate deficiency" of intelligence in blacks. My position on this question is clearly spelled out in my most recent book: "The plain fact is that at present there exists no scientifically satisfactory explanation for the differences between the IQ distributions in the black and white populations. The only genuine consensus among well-informed scientists on this topic is that the cause of the difference remains an open question."

In other words, he acknowledges, but doesn't admit to the cause being "environmental" differences.

Can you post a web address to Professor Jensen's statement? I think it is likely that he did say that, and that he said it under duress. His more recent statement does not explain why his earlier statement has been verified by subsequent events.