Left targets justices' homes

[SugarDaddy1]

Leftist activists are directing protestors to confront conservative Supreme Court Justices at their homes in Maryland and Virginia.

Justices John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch are all targets by an organization called, “Ruth Sent Us.” The organization has published the justices’ supposed home addresses online for the radical protestors to locate.

It is not the first time radical-left organizations have mobilized to intimidate political opponents at their homes. In September, protestors under the banner of ShutDownDC picketed outside Kavanaugh’s home to express angst against pro-life laws. In January, the same organization was also responsible for the protests outside Sen. Josh Hawley’s (R-MO) home in Virginia.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...te-conservative-supreme-court-justices-homes/

 

[ll74]

Dupe

 

[anarchoMando]

Dupe

Kinky

 

[pecksniff]

It's Breitbart. Ignore it.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Now protests are a bad thing again?

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Lefties oppose political intimidation - except when they don’t.

 

[anarchoMando]

Lefties oppose political intimidation - except when they don’t.

When it's protecting the bodily autonomy of women's rights

Along with the right to safe contraceptions for unmarried people

Along with the right to do sodomy and not be jailed

Along with the right to have gay marriage

Along with the right to have interracial marriage

A lot of issues were built in the right to privacy doctrine. Of course they're going to do a little bit of intimidation they're very livelihood would be at risk if they don't

 

[ll74]

Lefties oppose political intimidation - except when they don’t.

Most people oppose assholes

 

[KeithD]

Are they waving guns and intimidating people going in and out? If not, they probably aren't gun nut Republicans, so it's just folks exercising free speech.

You board Trumpettes live in the world of deep hypocrisy.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

When it's protecting the bodily autonomy of women's rights

Along with the right to safe contraceptions for unmarried people

Along with the right to do sodomy and not be jailed

Along with the right to have gay marriage

Along with the right to have interracial marriage

A lot of issues were built in the right to privacy doctrine. Of course they're going to do a little bit of intimidation they're very livelihood would be at risk if they don't

Not at all a justification but I credit you for acknowledging that intimidation of members of the judiciary is the objective.

 

[ll74]

Showing up at someone's house is never about protesting and always about intimidating

 

[anarchoMando]

Showing up at someone's house is never about protesting and always about intimidating

To be fair all of the actions that roe v Wade has prevented by very existence is intimidating

 

[JohnEngelman]

Now protests are a bad thing again?

Protests that become violent and destructive are.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Protests that become violent and destructive are.

Since when precisely?

 

[ll74]

To be fair all of the actions that roe v Wade has prevented by very existence is intimidating

False equivalency.

I will never support protesting at someone's house. (Just as I will never support violent agitators at protests)

 

[Sean Renaud]

The Black Ghetto Riots also lead to the actual passing of Civil Rights legislation that would have at best taken a few more years to pass than they did and at worse who knows? Its impossible to tell without a time machine.

The rest of your post is just a referendum on how racist this nation is not an argument that violent protests are bad. At the low end close to fifty percent of either supportive or tacitly accepting of J6.

 

[Rightguide]

Most people oppose assholes

Except their own and especially those like you who use them to think and speak with.

 

[ll74]

Except their own and especially those like you who use them to think and speak with.

Did it take you all afternoon for that witty one?

Rare form today, Sparky

 

[Rightguide]

Are they waving guns and intimidating people going in and out? If not, they probably aren't gun nut Republicans, so it's just folks exercising free speech.

You board Trumpettes live in the world of deep hypocrisy.

How about the Bernie supporting gun nut who tried to kill every Republican on baseball field in D.C.?

 

[Rightguide]

Did it take you all afternoon for that witty one?

Rare form today, Sparky

Nope just clicked in and thought I'd highlight your intellectual nerve center.

 

[ll74]

Nope just clicked in and thought I'd highlight your intellectual nerve center.

Good job there. It helps that you steered clear of your conspiratorial bullshit in the post then

 

[Rightguide]

18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading​

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.

 

[Rightguide]

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...te-conservative-supreme-court-justices-homes/

So hopefully when they come they will face arrest.

 

[BlueEyesInLevis]

Dupe

No rebuttal, no denial, no clarification.
Just an ad hominem attack. (Another rhetorical white flag of surrender)

 

[BlueEyesInLevis]

Now protests are a bad thing again?

No illegal protests are a good thing?