Democrats bid to change Senate rules if Republicans thwart voting rights reform

[pecksniff]

No.

Britannica > leftistWiki bullshit.

And you are similarly deluded if you think RationalWiki is leftist.

 

[GothTalk]

And you are similarly deluded if you think RationalWiki is leftist.

You can pretend it doesn't read like a bunch of woke lunatics wrote it.

But I can see that shit crusted 10ft deep on nearly every page you link from them.

Again.... Britannica > LeftistWiki.

And social liberalism, just like most ism isn't the ONLY type of liberalism.

Your own page as biased as it is, is honest enough to lay that out for you.

READ your own link buddy, despite the obvious disgust with liberalism in the end it supports nearly EVERYTHING I've said about this topic and shits all over the idea that liberalism = Democrats and any authoritarianism/totalitarianism they force on the masses. No matter how much you and the authoritarian comrades stamp your feet and pretend otherwise.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Oh look

"I don't like it, so it must be LEFTIST/TOTALITARIAN/AUTHORITARIAN/COMMIE"

#TriggeredAgain

 

[butters]

some republicans interested in codifying the role of V.P re the electoral count

Elected Republicans have shown little interest in changing the law — until now. Still, without their support for any voting rights legislation (and it’s clear that’s not happening) some Democrats oppose reforming the ECA on its own. Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA), for example, called the prospect of a standalone ECA reform bill “a distraction” and “a cynical political maneuver by people who are trying to rig the elections in our country.”

The Senate’s first- and second-ranking Republicans, Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and John Thune (R-SD) broached the topic for the first time this week.

“It obviously has some flaws. And it is worth, I think, discussing,” McConnell told Politico of the 1887 law. Thune told Axios that, in contrast with Democrats’ other bills to reform election laws and add voting rights protections, “with the Electoral Count Act, as we saw last time around, there are some things there that, I think, could be corrected.”

They’re not alone: Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) told Politico the ECA was a “weak point,” and Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) said “It is something worth evaluating, and looking for other ways to make sure there is not a way to corrupt the counting process.”

Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) separately told reporters Wednesday that the law was “vague and ambiguous” and said it “contributed to some of the confusion on Jan. 6.”

“A change that I would like to see, personally, is to make very clear that the vice president does not have the power to overturn the electoral counts of the states,” she added. Then-Vice President Mike Pence didn’t give in to Trump’s pressure to overturn the election, Collins said, “but what if he had? Or what if a future vice president decided to play political games with the Electoral Count Act?”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...m-dems-are-skeptical/ar-AAStevE?ocid=msedgntp

Is Sen. Warnock right? When m.m slips this kind of thing into play, you can be sure he has his own solid motives–one of which would be making sure t never gets a chance to sit as president again; a second would be ensuring no democratic V.P could ever attempt what pence was asked to do; a third would be Sen.Warnock's suggestion.

 

[GothTalk]

Oh look

"I don't like it, so it must be LEFTIST/TOTALITARIAN/AUTHORITARIAN/COMMIE"

#TriggeredAgain

Rob making up shit he can't support.

No Rob.

It's leftist because it's coming from the equity seeking party.

It's authoritarian because it's directly power and authority seeking. Elimination of bipartisanship.

Stay mad about the facts.

 

[pecksniff]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...m-dems-are-skeptical/ar-AAStevE?ocid=msedgntp

Is Sen. Warnock right? When m.m slips this kind of thing into play, you can be sure he has his own solid motives–one of which would be making sure t never gets a chance to sit as president again; a second would be ensuring no democratic V.P could ever attempt what pence was asked to do; a third would be Sen.Warnock's suggestion.

Sure, why not, amend the ECA for clarification.

 

[BidudeinWi]

'Bout fucking time.

Here’s crying Chuckie in a video from 2005 talking about EXACTLY the same thing!

LibTards are frauds and have a VERY short memory!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...minating-filibuster-doomsday-democracy-video/

 

[pecksniff]

You can pretend it doesn't read like a bunch of woke lunatics wrote it.

RationalWiki does not read like any lunatics wrote it. Rationality is its thing.