Evidence Mounts — Chauvin Did Not Murder Floyd

[SyLent]

https://spectator.org/chauvin-floyd-evidence/


but we needa PLACATE duh NIGGERS

 

[ll74]

He is a convicted murderer.

Move along.

 

[CornusKousa]

He is a convicted murderer.

Move along.

^^

The left is desperate for people to stop looking into the total miscarriage of justice and their promotion of mob rule.

 

[ll74]

^^

The left is desperate for people to stop looking into the total miscarriage of justice and their promotion of mob rule.

The Trumpies refuse to acknowledge a conviction as well as the excessive use of force

 

[CornusKousa]

The Trumpies refuse to acknowledge a conviction as well as the excessive use of force

Because mob justice is an invalid form of justice in this country.

A fair trial is a civil right in this country.

(D)'s and everyone else who supports it, undermining that right, should be fucking ashamed of themselves.


It wasn't excessive use of force either, enjoy that crime wave in the blue shit hole cities.

 

[jomar]

Surprise, surprise, defense attorneys desperately trying to spin reality to misdirect on a public murder that was proven by evidence.

 

[CornusKousa]

Surprise, surprise, defense attorneys desperately trying to spin reality to misdirect on a public murder that was proven by evidence.

LMFAO!!!!

It wasn't proven by evidence.

It was a sham conviction secured via terrorism and intimidation of the jury.

You're just a mob justice advocate because it suits your partisan fee fees.

I only hope one day you're on trail and congress critters show up to promote and threaten more violence if the jury doesn't convict you.

 

[jomar]

LMFAO!!!!

It wasn't proven by evidence.

It was a sham conviction secured via terrorism and intimidation of the jury.

You're just a mob justice advocate because it suits your partisan fee fees.

I only hope one day you're on trail and congress critters show up to promote and threaten more violence if the jury doesn't convict you.

We’ve had this conversation and at the end my countering your misleading statements with facts in evidence, all you were left with was nu-uh opinions.

Feel free to continue rehashing your nu-uh here, though.

 

[CornusKousa]

We’ve had this conversation and at the end my countering your misleading statements with facts in evidence, all you were left with was nu-uh opinions.

Feel free to continue rehashing your nu-uh here, though.

Yes, I remember when you ignored the evidence you didn't want to hear nor any of the observable realities you wanted to ignore because white cop bad!!!

Racist piece of shit.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

The Trumpies refuse to acknowledge a conviction as well as the excessive use of force

Your post doesn't go far enough to be accurate. They don't like our justice system. The accused got a trial and can appeal the case. There's nothing to be upset about here.

 

[CornusKousa]

Your post doesn't go far enough to be accurate. They don't like our justice system. The accused got a trial and can appeal the case. There's nothing to be upset about here.

Yes, mob justice is bad.

 

[jomar]

Yes, I remember when you ignored the evidence you didn't want to hear nor any of the observable realities you wanted to ignore because white cop bad!!!

Racist piece of shit.

Proving your memory is either selective or defective.

Or more likely you don’t give a shit about reality that cuts against your OANN talking points.

It’s not racist to hold a cop accountable for their illegal actions. But might be racist not to.

But I get you’re out of gas resorting to name calling.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Yes, mob justice is bad.

Certainly not the case here.

 

[ll74]

Because mob justice is an invalid form of justice in this country.

A fair trial is a civil right in this country.

(D)'s and everyone else who supports it, undermining that right, should be fucking ashamed of themselves.


It wasn't excessive use of force either, enjoy that crime wave in the blue shit hole cities.

Yes, I get that you believe that.

 

[CornusKousa]

Proving your memory is either selective or defective.

Or more likely you don’t give a shit about reality that cuts against your OANN talking points.

It’s not racist to hold a cop accountable for their illegal actions. But might be racist not to.

But I get you’re out of gas resorting to name calling.

No, there is just no point in interacting with a zealous racist who just wants to see white people punished...because whitneess BAD!!!

Certainly not the case here.

Absolutely the case. Thus all the (D) rioting, and (D) congress critters flying in from out of state to threaten the jury to get the "correct" verdict.

Yes, I get that you believe that.

I get that you reject facts.

 

[ishtat]

Most of the article is whataboutism. The facts, the evidence against Chauvin are not disputable until and unless he gets a re-trial.

All the appeal can be based on is whether the Judge made an error in law, whether he misdirected the Jury or made a significant error in the conduct of the case.

In American criminal law the Jury is the sole arbiter of facts, so absolutely none of this purported fresh material will even be considered unless Chauvin gets a new trial. His chances at the moment seem slim.

 

[SyLent]

Most of the article is whataboutism. The facts, the evidence against Chauvin are not disputable until and unless he gets a re-trial.

All the appeal can be based on is whether the Judge made an error in law, whether he misdirected the Jury or made a significant error in the conduct of the case.

In American criminal law the Jury is the sole arbiter of facts, so absolutely none of this purported fresh material will even be considered unless Chauvin gets a new trial. His chances at the moment seem slim.

or there is new evidence

 

[CornusKousa]

So don't be a white person in Minneapolis, or really any blue shit hole....BAD move.

 

[jomar]

No, there is just no point in interacting with a zealous racist who just wants to see white people punished...because whitneess BAD!!!

Look in the mirror at your relentless broken-record, ascription laden "I got a hammer and everything's a nail" posts. No point interacting because you got nothing, I get it. Talk about a zealot!

And you don't even realize you're the one looking racist around Chauvin.

Can I get a BINGO!

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

No, there is just no point in interacting with a zealous racist who just wants to see white people punished...because whitneess BAD!!!



Absolutely the case. Thus all the (D) rioting, and (D) congress critters flying in from out of state to threaten the jury to get the "correct" verdict.



I get that you reject facts.

What evidence and facts do you have to show that belief is true?

 

[WillJ8787]

https://spectator.org/chauvin-floyd-evidence/


but we needa PLACATE duh NIGGERS

Blahahahaha....and Elvis is still alive and well in Tennessee.

Good one!!!

 

[phrodeau]

Chauvin will be sentenced on Friday.

Somewhere in America, some weekend militia group is planning to hold a little “rally” outside the courthouse. Then, under a Blue Lives Matter banner, they’ll try to storm into the courtroom and free him.

 

[CornusKousa]

Look in the mirror at your relentless broken-record, ascription laden "I got a hammer and everything's a nail" posts. No point interacting because you got nothing, I get it. Talk about a zealot!

And you don't even realize you're the one looking racist around Chauvin.

Can I get a BINGO!

How am I the one looking racist around Chauvin???

I'm not the one celebrating a miscarriage of justice because the defendant was white.

What evidence and facts do you have to show that belief is true?

Every available news report covering the trial and riots surrounding it.

 

[ll74]

Most of the article is whataboutism. The facts, the evidence against Chauvin are not disputable until and unless he gets a re-trial.

All the appeal can be based on is whether the Judge made an error in law, whether he misdirected the Jury or made a significant error in the conduct of the case.

In American criminal law the Jury is the sole arbiter of facts, so absolutely none of this purported fresh material will even be considered unless Chauvin gets a new trial. His chances at the moment seem slim.

If there is sufficient evidence that there was bias or that the judge acted inappropriately then it should be easy to prove on appeal.

The problem is that there isn't.

And the reality is that Chaivin is a convicted murderer...and all Trumpies focus on is the victim rather than the act itself.

 

[CornusKousa]

Chauvin will be sentenced on Friday.

Somewhere in America, some weekend militia group is planning to hold a little “rally” outside the courthouse. Then, under a Blue Lives Matter banner, they’ll try to storm into the courtroom and free him.

Fuck blue lives.....cops have lost support, they're just paid goons for the DNC. Nothing more than the cheapest of thugs a government budget could squeeze in.

ABOLISH the police.