Deplorables: Prove your 1st Amendment Rights have been violated.

[RoryN]

Kthx!

 

[nowisthetime]

So far, these are the common arguments I've heard on HERE (I don't associate with them in real life) from Deplorables.

1. Democrats and the Left want RETRIBUTION-well, duh, we want the perpetrators to face full justice.




2. But...but...unity-No unity until accountability.




3. But...but...free speech-Well, terrorism has consequences. They had no problem on trampling on people's right to a free and fair election, did they?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Kthx!

Get ready for crickets.

 

[jaF0]

Get ready for crickets.

Chocolate covered?

 

[CornusKousa]

Did anyone ever claim that their 1st amendment rights had been violated??

Or is the left howling at the sky again??

 

[bhurry]

Did anyone ever claim that their 1st amendment rights had been violated??

Or is the left howling at the sky again??

what else do they do.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

[Donald Trump’s lawyers have argued that protesters “have no right” to “express dissenting views” at his campaign rallies because it infringes on the US President’s First Amendment rights.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

https://i.imgur.com/FKNqlLO.jpg

 

[RoryN]

Did anyone ever claim that their 1st amendment rights had been violated??

^^^ Exactly what I was fishing for.

As usual, all too easy.

 

[CornusKousa]

^^^ Exactly what I was fishing for.

As usual, all too easy.

So you were just yelling at the sky.....thought so

 

[RoryN]

Get ready for crickets.

Yup! .

 

[WillJ8787]

Yep...it's too hard for them to write more than a sentence.

 

[icanhelp1]

Kthx!

https://www.freedomforum.org/2020/1...r-first-amendment-religion-and-speech-rights/

JUSTICE ALITO SEES DANGER AHEAD FOR FIRST AMENDMENT RELIGION AND SPEECH RIGHTS
Posted on November 17, 2020 by Tony Mauro in News
This column expresses the views of Tony Mauro, special correspondent for the Freedom Forum.

In a fiery speech Nov. 12 before the Federalist Society, conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Jr. offered a list of grievances about the state of individual rights in America, from the “unimaginable restrictions” imposed because of the pandemic to the relegation of the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms to the status of “second-tier constitutional right.”

Alito’s main focus seemed to be the status of the First Amendment. “It pains me to say this, but in certain quarters, religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right,” Alito said. “The right of the free exercise of religion is not the only once-cherished freedom that is falling, in the estimation of some segments of the population. Support for freedom of speech is also in danger.”

Alito’s admonition may come as a surprise, since conservatives have won numerous Supreme Court victories in First Amendment disputes in recent decades. To some extent, he was chiding his colleagues for not winning even more cases.

The days are over when the First Amendment was nurtured mainly by liberal justices like Hugo Black and William Brennan Jr. Conservative wins led a frustrated liberal Justice Elena Kagan to assert in 2018 that the First Amendment has been “weaponized” to satisfy a conservative agenda.

In the Federalist Society speech, Alito himself acknowledged that “during my 15 years on the court, a lot of good work has been done to protect freedom of speech, religious liberty and the structure of government created by the Constitution.”


READ ON!

 

[CornusKousa]

Yep...it's too hard for them to write more than a sentence.

Typical lefty move....prove something I made up for you to prove!! OH I win!!!

It's all they have

 

[Dribble]

https://www.freedomforum.org/2020/1...r-first-amendment-religion-and-speech-rights/

JUSTICE ALITO SEES DANGER AHEAD FOR FIRST AMENDMENT RELIGION AND SPEECH RIGHTS
Posted on November 17, 2020 by Tony Mauro in News
This column expresses the views of Tony Mauro, special correspondent for the Freedom Forum.

In a fiery speech Nov. 12 before the Federalist Society, conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Jr. offered a list of grievances about the state of individual rights in America, from the “unimaginable restrictions” imposed because of the pandemic to the relegation of the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms to the status of “second-tier constitutional right.”

Alito’s main focus seemed to be the status of the First Amendment. “It pains me to say this, but in certain quarters, religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right,” Alito said. “The right of the free exercise of religion is not the only once-cherished freedom that is falling, in the estimation of some segments of the population. Support for freedom of speech is also in danger.”

Alito’s admonition may come as a surprise, since conservatives have won numerous Supreme Court victories in First Amendment disputes in recent decades. To some extent, he was chiding his colleagues for not winning even more cases.

The days are over when the First Amendment was nurtured mainly by liberal justices like Hugo Black and William Brennan Jr. Conservative wins led a frustrated liberal Justice Elena Kagan to assert in 2018 that the First Amendment has been “weaponized” to satisfy a conservative agenda.

In the Federalist Society speech, Alito himself acknowledged that “during my 15 years on the court, a lot of good work has been done to protect freedom of speech, religious liberty and the structure of government created by the Constitution.”


READ ON!

Evidence? That means an example...not someone saying they "fear" something. You know...like the reason your Fascist traitor lost so many Court cases...show evidence of widespread voter fraud. But thanks for playing.

 

[WillJ8787]

Alito does use the correct terms for conservative and liberal justices...he is correct about that.

This statement of his isn't specific enough so I don't exactly know what he means.

 

[adrina]

Evidence? That means an example...not someone saying they "fear" something. You know...like the reason your Fascist traitor lost so many Court cases...show evidence of widespread voter fraud. But thanks for playing.

What we have here is the usual - hypocritical sellout posting partisan drivel. I mean really, "freedomforum.org". Now that just screams non-partisan now doesn't it.

 

[CornusKousa]

What we have here is the usual - hypocritical sellout posting partisan drivel. I mean really, "freedomforum.org". Now that just screams non-partisan now doesn't it.

It's seems to be pro-freedom....no wonder it has adrina rolling her eyes.

Just seeing words like "freedom" and "liberty" probably causes a violent retching reaction from most progressive folks.

 

[WillJ8787]

What we have here is the usual - hypocritical sellout posting partisan drivel. I mean really, "freedomforum.org". Now that just screams non-partisan now doesn't it.

This is what these far right folks do....they re-brand their message and call it things like you have identified:

Freedom forum
Citizens United

To dupe the simple minded. It's a tactic that goes back to Hitler and Stalin and further back then that.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Deplorables: Prove your 1st Amendment Rights have been violated.

They've gotten coy about referencing the First Amendment....we've thumped their flat heads enough so that they now whine instead about nebulous "anti-free speech" and "censorship"...because they hate any and all rules that apply to them. It's okay for a Christian baker to deny homo wedding cakes but not okay for a social media platform to deny them their "right" to spread their toxic shitsludge ideology.

Why? Because...that...That....THAT'S DIFFERENT!

 

[CornusKousa]

This is what these far right folks do....they re-brand their message and call it things like you have identified:

Freedom forum
Citizens United

To dupe the simple minded. It's a tactic that goes back to Hitler and Stalin and further back then that.

Tell us more about "social justice" and "white privilege" lol!!!

Dear Kettle8787.....grab a mirror.

 

[CornusKousa]

They've gotten coy about referencing the First Amendment....we've thumped their flat heads enough so that they now whine instead about nebulous "anti-free speech" and "censorship"...because they hate any and all rules that apply to them. It's okay for a Christian baker to deny homo wedding cakes but not okay for a social media platform to deny them their "right" to spread their toxic shitsludge ideology.

Why? Because...that...That....THAT'S DIFFERENT!

There is the big lie....same one Rory tried in OP.

You can always count on at least one in every OpenBordersDownSouth post.

You "progressive" authoritarians are just mad because you've been called out for being anti-free speech and you've got NO argument otherwise.

You just have to sit there and own being outed as against one of the most fundamental social values of our society/nation.

Anti-free speech, freedom of assembly, religion, armament, states rights, private property, due process....... Is there ANYTHING about the USA that progressives do like???

 

[RobDownSouth]

"blah blah blah lie blah blah blah open borders".

Predictable to a fault.

 

[CornusKousa]

"blah blah blah lie blah blah blah open borders".

Predictable to a fault.

Awwwww poor rob isn't man enough to own his being anti-free speech.

Add every other civil right to the list of things you openly detest about the USA and you're just a paragon of patriotism aren't you??

Is there anything you do like about the USA as a political entity??? Can you name a single thing??

 

[RobDownSouth]

"blah blah blah anti-free speech blah blah blah patriotism! blah"
Still predictable.