We Knew It Was Coming

Harpy, if you're here, I have to ask if you've ever heard of a amicus curiae proceeding at the trial court level in opposition to a rule 48 motion?

I don't practice in Federal Court but the order flies in the face of just about every motion to dismiss I've ever heard of.

Why does the judge need a "special master" to brief the court on whether someone should be charged with criminal contempt? Isn't the court competent to determine that for itself from the record? Or is the court trying to insulate itself from the obligations that the court has to dispense justice according to the law?

Sydney Powell NEEDS to file an emergency Writ. Today.
 
I don't practice in Federal Court but the order flies in the face of just about every motion to dismiss I've ever heard of.

Why does the judge need a "special master" to brief the court on whether someone should be charged with criminal contempt? Isn't the court competent to determine that for itself from the record? Or is the court trying to insulate itself from the obligations that the court has to dispense justice according to the law?

Sydney Powell NEEDS to file an emergency Writ. Today.



IMO I think the judge made it political back when. Still carrying a disdain for Flynn he's trying to extricate himself from the political ramification while still proceeding with charges of contempt against Flynn. This Judge needs to be overridden by a higher court as being incompetent. He is leading the court and not presiding. It's obvious he's agenda driven and extremely prejudicial.
 
I don't practice in Federal Court but the order flies in the face of just about every motion to dismiss I've ever heard of.

Why does the judge need a "special master" to brief the court on whether someone should be charged with criminal contempt? Isn't the court competent to determine that for itself from the record? Or is the court trying to insulate itself from the obligations that the court has to dispense justice according to the law?

Sydney Powell NEEDS to file an emergency Writ. Today.

Totally agree. On top of implying he doesn't know the facts of his own case, he appoints a judge who made these statements the other day in an op-ed in the WaPo:

“Flynn’s guilt has already been adjudicated,”

“So if the court finds dismissal would result in a miscarriage of justice, it can deny the motion, refuse to permit withdrawal of the guilty plea and proceed to sentencing.”

I wouldn't pretend he could be anywhere near a fair arbiter of the facts in this case.
 
IMO I think the judge made it political back when. Still carrying a disdain for Flynn he's trying to extricate himself from the political ramification while still proceeding with charges of contempt against Flynn. This Judge needs to be overridden by a higher court as being incompetent. He is leading the court and not presiding. It's obvious he's agenda driven and extremely prejudicial.

He needs to face an ethics examination. An ethics complaint is in the process as we speak.
 
“Federal prosecutors detailed to the Special Counsel’s Office thought Flynn’s lies were material. They signed their names to court documents that outlined the facts that supported his guilty plea, including the material false statements Flynn made. That six-page statement of the offense is part of the public record.

Federal District Judge Rudolph Contreras thought Flynn’s lies were material. Flynn pleaded guilty to the charge of making a material false statement in his courtroom in December 2017. A judge will accept a guilty plea in federal court only if there is a factual basis for it and only if all the elements of the offense are proved. If the judge did not believe the lies were material, he presumably would not have accepted the plea agreement.

Federal District Judge Emmet Sullivan thought Flynn’s lies were material. Flynn restated his guilty plea in front of Sullivan in December 2018, after the case was transferred to his court. Further, in December 2019, Sullivan noted in a written order that Flynn’s false statements to the FBI were clearly material.

Flynn’s two original experienced defense attorneys thought Flynn’s lies were material. They signed their names to a plea document, noting that they “concur in (Flynn’s) desire to adopt and stipulate to this Statement of the Offense as true and accurate.”

Michael Flynn thought his lies were material. He signed his name to a plea agreement “knowingly and voluntarily and because (he was) in fact, guilty of the crime charged.” Flynn stipulated to a filed “Statement of the Offense” and declared “under penalty of perjury that it is true and correct.” That statement — to which Flynn agreed — noted that Flynn “made materially false statements and omissions during an interview with the (FBI) on January 24, 2017” and then spelled out, in detail, those false material statements. Flynn pleaded guilty in front of one federal judge, maintained his guilty plea in front of a second federal judge and, while under oath, twice admitted that he lied and that his lies were material.”

-Seattle Times

He stated under oath, twice, that his lies were material. So...either he lied, or he perjured himself In federal court. Take your pick.
 
Totally agree. On top of implying he doesn't know the facts of his own case, he appoints a judge who made these statements the other day in an op-ed in the WaPo:

“Flynn’s guilt has already been adjudicated,”

“So if the court finds dismissal would result in a miscarriage of justice, it can deny the motion, refuse to permit withdrawal of the guilty plea and proceed to sentencing.”

I wouldn't pretend he could be anywhere near a fair arbiter of the facts in this case.

1 of 4 things can happen here.

1. Sullivan can deny the motion. The case then proceeds to sentencing, Flynn appeals and the appeals court reverses and vacates with an order to the lower court to dismiss the case.

2. The special magistrate can recommend anything and Sullivan will go along with it. If that results in contempt charges, Flynn will appeal, the appeals court will reverse and vacate with an order to dismiss the entire case.

3. Sullivan will finally pull his head out of his ass and see where he's fucking up. The likelihood of this happening is about as probable as someone you know being hit by lightning a dozen times, but it's still possible.

4. Sullivan will grant the motion.
 
“Federal prosecutors detailed to the Special Counsel’s Office thought Flynn’s lies were material. They signed their names to court documents that outlined the facts that supported his guilty plea, including the material false statements Flynn made. That six-page statement of the offense is part of the public record.

STOP!

Understand the Mueller team knew they were running a phony investigation. They knew Flynn was innocent. They knew when they started there was no collusion by Trump or his campaign. They understood they were initiating a coup. That's why they're under investigation right now. In the end all they wrought essentially will be ruled to be "fruit of the poisonous tree."
 
He needs to face an ethics examination. An ethics complaint is in the process as we speak.


You say this a lot like you whining on a porn board about it is going to make a difference. You're nothing but an right-wing extremist troll.
 
STOP!

Understand the Mueller team knew they were running a phony investigation. They knew Flynn was innocent. They knew when they started there was no collusion by Trump or his campaign. They understood they were initiating a coup. That's why they're under investigation right now. In the end all they wrought essentially will be ruled to be "fruit of the poisonous tree."

Flynn plead guilty and two federal judges accepted that plea.
 
Luk, ask mom to change your diapers and find your binky.:rolleyes:

luk doesn't seem to understand that all of us individuals who are "whining on a porn" board also vote. Nor does he understand that our voices influence our representatives just as much as his does.

but, nothing makes a progressive happier than when he can suppress the voices who are in opposition to his tyranny.
 
Luk, ask mom to change your diapers and find your binky.:rolleyes:

luk doesn't seem to understand that all of us individuals who are "whining on a porn" board also vote. Nor does he understand that our voices influence our representatives just as much as his does.

but, nothing makes a progressive happier than when he can suppress the voices who are in opposition to his tyranny.

What?
 
You say this a lot like you whining on a porn board about it is going to make a difference. You're nothing but an right-wing extremist troll.

Obviously someone in higher government is going to come to this specific site, read his many threads and posts of wisdom on these matters, come to realizations and conclusions they hadn't thought of previously and will summarily put the proper judgement into praxis, for the good of the nation and Republic.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/a5f7acd356f358bee605d3c7d1f208e8/tenor.gif?itemid=14429761
 
Obviously someone in higher government is going to come to this specific site, read his many threads and posts of wisdom on these matters, come to realizations and conclusions they hadn't thought of previously and will summarily put the proper judgement into praxis, for the good of the nation and Republic.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/a5f7acd356f358bee605d3c7d1f208e8/tenor.gif?itemid=14429761

These are the same twits who were creating anit-Obama threads fully believing Obama would read them.
 
He was lied to by his prior counsel who failed to conduct adequate discovery.

So he was coerced or he got bad advice from his own counsel? Which one was it?

None of that changes the fact that Flynn insists that he was not coerced.
 
We now know better, we have FBI handwritten notes in support of coercion. Get up to date and stop supporting the incarceration of a "political prisoner" in the United States.

You're such a partisan dope. Flynn is, much like you, a proven liar. Get the fuck over supporting the Flynn case because it/he is a loser. You don't get to chose what lies to believe.
 
Back
Top