HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 42,668
Harpy, if you're here, I have to ask if you've ever heard of a amicus curiae proceeding at the trial court level in opposition to a rule 48 motion?
I don't practice in Federal Court but the order flies in the face of just about every motion to dismiss I've ever heard of.
Why does the judge need a "special master" to brief the court on whether someone should be charged with criminal contempt? Isn't the court competent to determine that for itself from the record? Or is the court trying to insulate itself from the obligations that the court has to dispense justice according to the law?
Sydney Powell NEEDS to file an emergency Writ. Today.