███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

[Adre]

Man Who Inherited $400 Million From His Daddy, Went Bankrupt Six Times, Including Casinos (Yes, Casinos), And Yet Still Somehow Became President Despite Losing Popular Vote by 3 Million Complains Life Isn’t Fair#ArticlesOfImpeachment #TrumpImpeachment

 

[bigsly]

Trump says:

Someday there will be a Democratic President and a Republican House and they may remember this.

We know, moron, it was 1998.

Hardly.

The 2 Articles of Impeachment Clinton was charged with were actual, factual offenses (Perjury for lying under oath to a federal grand jury and Obstruction of Justice for, just one example, Clinton instructing his personal secretary to get rid of Monica Lewinsky's infamous blue dress, evidence which Clinton had DNA'd on).

Also, unlike the totally partisan Judiciary Committee vote for Articles of Impeachment against Trump, the Republican majority Judiciary Committee voting for Clinton's Articles of Impeachment actually had Democrats joining them.

...Yet Still Somehow Became President Despite Losing Popular Vote...

"Somehow"?

You do understand that "how" Trump "Became President" is the constitutional way to become President, right?

You cannot possibly be in irl the totally partisan stupid fuck you consistently expose yourself as here, right?

 

[BotanyBoy]

https://media2.giphy.com/media/alfaHiEiNrkIg/source.gif

Yea...that's about all you've got.

Man Who Inherited $400 Million From His Daddy, Went Bankrupt Six Times, Including Casinos (Yes, Casinos), And Yet Still Somehow Became President Despite Losing Popular Vote by 3 Million Complains Life Isn’t Fair#ArticlesOfImpeachment #TrumpImpeachment

Somehow!! Adre still doesn't understand the states elect POTUS.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Yea...that's about all you've got.



Somehow!! Adre still doesn't understand the states elect POTUS.

After what you wrote it was all that's needed.

 

[Adre]

Yea...that's about all you've got.



Somehow!! Adre still doesn't understand the states elect POTUS.

Actually, I do. This was a tweet about our Whiner-in-Chief from someone that I found amusing.

 

[Klinkster]

aren't you the snowflake who cries whenever someone goes ad hom? fucking hypocritical rightie.

Nope. Wrong again jizzum.
I'm just a guy who insults you flaming assholes right back.


OK for you, makes it OK for me. Or is there some NON-equal rights thing you haven't told us about?

(You fucking hypocritical leftist dick smoker)

 

[schism666]

Nope. Wrong again jizzum.
I'm just a guy who insults you flaming assholes right back.


OK for you, makes it OK for me. Or is there some NON-equal rights thing you haven't told us about?

(You fucking hypocritical leftist dick smoker)

you'd do better on the playground.

 

[Klinkster]

you'd do better on the playground.

You'd do better if you pulled your head out of your ass.

 

[about_average]

Hardly.

The 2 Articles of Impeachment Clinton was charged with were actual, factual offenses (Perjury for lying under oath to a federal grand jury and Obstruction of Justice for, just one example, Clinton instructing his personal secretary to get rid of Monica Lewinsky's infamous blue dress, evidence which Clinton had DNA'd on).

And Trump committed factual offenses, or have you not bothered to read the US Code on soliciting campaign assistance from a foreign country?
Telling subordinates to ignore legal subpoenas is a factual offense.

 

[phrodeau]

I'm getting an ominous feeling. Somebody out there is going to take it upon themselves to solve this problem in their own way and Der Fuhrer is going to get in the history books one last time.

I don't like the thought of assassination, but if one really wants to take down Trump and the Republican party, they should assassinate Putin.

 

[Fart_knocker]

https://i.redd.it/u7wvwnzic3541.jpg

 

[cowslinger64]

Just keeps getting better... you trump ball lickers are really fucked in the head..

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/giuliani-hints-defense-trump-did-174550140.html

Giuliani Hints at New Defense: So What If Trump Did It?

Slowly but perceptibly, the Trump administration is moving towards a concrete defense in the president’s Senate impeachment trial: Not that Donald Trump didn’t pressure Ukraine to investigate Joe and Hunter Biden, but that he did — and that there’s nothing wrong with it.

The latest indication of this direction comes from the president’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, who in a couple of press interviews has acknowledged his role in advising President Trump to arrange the firing of the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, because Giuliani believed she stood in the way of getting those investigations.

If Trump wanted to focus on the impeachment defense that there was no quid pro quo and that he innocently asked for the investigations in order to fight corruption, then it would be genuinely crazy for his personal lawyer to reveal the specifics of how and what he communicated to the president. Giuliani’s statements are terribly harmful to Trump’s case — and he has now effectively waived attorney-client privilege, so he could be called to testify.

Of course Giuliani could just be crazy, a loose cannon making statements deeply detrimental to one possible line of defense his client might want to use in his Senate trial. But it seems more likely that Giuliani is foreshadowing Trump’s future defense.

To see why Giuliani’s interviews are only sane if Trump is planning a “so what” defense, consider how damaging the revelations are to the alternate defense that Trump was seeking to fight corruption, not achieve personal gain.

Most basically, Giuliani’s narrative shows definitively that Ukraine policy was being driven by Trump’s personal political objectives, not by the national interest. That’s why Giuliani, a man with no U.S. government position — but with a direct, personal attorney-client relationship with the president — was driving the policy. It’s not normal for the president’s personal attorney to advise on the removal of an ambassador — who doesn’t work for the president personally, but for the U.S. government. The very fact of Giuliani’s advice, coupled with its ultimate success, helps prove the case that Trump was abusing his office, using the power of the presidency to advance his personal goals.

 

[cowslinger64]

Sure, not guilty...



On the eve of his likely impeachment, President Trump on Tuesday sent House Speaker Nancy Pelosi a scathing, insult-filled letter calling the articles drawn up against him “a completely disingenuous, baseless and meritless invention of your imagination,” among other things.

“I write to express my strongest and most powerful protest against the partisan impeachment crusade being pursued by the Democrats in the House of Representatives,” Trump wrote in the six-page letter, salted with at least eight exclamation marks. “This impeachment presents an unprecedented and unconstitutional abuse of power by Democrat Lawmakers, unequaled in nearly two and a half centuries of American legislative history.”

The president claimed that the articles of impeachment advanced by the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees “include no crimes, no misdemeanors, and no offenses whatsoever.”

“You have cheapened the very ugly word, impeachment!” the president declared. “More due process was afforded to those accused in the Salem Witch Trials.”

"I have no doubt the American people will hold you and the Democrats fully responsible in the upcoming 2020 election,” he continued. “They will not soon forgive your perversion of justice and abuse of power."



WOW.. and here you dummies worship him.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-letter-pelosi-impeachment-eve-195636055.html

 

[BotanyBoy]

WOW.. and here you dummies worship him.

But at least we aren't freedom loathing anti-American scum like you.

 

[KeithD]

Sure, not guilty...



On the eve of his likely impeachment, President Trump on Tuesday sent House Speaker Nancy Pelosi a scathing, insult-filled letter calling the articles drawn up against him “a completely disingenuous, baseless and meritless invention of your imagination,” among other things.

There's some comfort in knowing he's having such a hissy fit over something that he said wouldn't bother him a bit.

 

[bigsly]

Sure, not guilty...:rolleyes

You understand, constitutionally/legally, if Trump is impeached by the House, that doesn't prove guilt, right?

You understand only 67 Senate votes constitutionally/legally establishes guilt, right?

You understand no American President - ever - has been found guilty of what he's been impeached for, right?

Leaving you what, besides your assho...I mean...opinion, to so partisanly prance and preen about?

 

[cowslinger64]

You understand, constitutionally/legally, if Trump is impeached by the House, that doesn't prove guilt, right?

You understand only 67 Senate votes constitutionally/legally establishes guilt, right?

You understand no American President - ever - has been found guilty of what he's been impeached for, right?

Leaving you what, besides your assho...I mean...opinion, to so partisanly prance and preen about?

Watching the president implode is not my opinion, nor partisan.


Go fuck yourself, eeyore.

 

[Curmudgeonly]

By "implode". . .you mean reach his highest ever job approval rating. . . and rake in millions of dollars in campaign contributions from his own stripe of partisans?

You do realize that partisanship is a two-way street?

 

[bigsly]

Watching the president implode is not my opinion, nor partisan.

Alas, you were addressing his being "guilty", which is both your opinion and partisanly so, asshole.

 

[adrina]

Woohoo... 43% and still almost 10% under water. Such low standards for such a "high" achievement.

 

[badbabysitter]

Trump will be impeached

It will go to the Senate, who will shoot it down without blinking

Trump will stay in office

Come election time either Trump will win giving the Rapepublicans 4 years to rebrand their party into something palatable

Or Trump will lose and the Rapebulican party will collapse into petty infighting trying to out douchebag each other to find the next Trump

 

[cowslinger64]

Alas, you were addressing his being "guilty", which is both your opinion and partisanly so, asshole.

I don't need your judgement on what I said, you're an idiot.


Try hooking up with vette and botanydummy...they both have their heads up their ass too.

 

[jaF0]

Moscow Mitch openly states he should be excluded from participating in the process. Same as Leper Lindsay.

 

[domroger]

Moscow Mitch openly states he should be excluded from participating in the process. Same as Leper Lindsay.

It will be interesting to watch what happens when the Chief Justice administers the oath ,he might even disqualify them from participating .

 

[jaF0]

And if Mikey gets tossed for bias too, things could get interesting.