███████████ Impeachment Proceedings On Donald Trump ███████████

[SgtSpiderMan]

Unlike you, oh great needle-dick-bug-fucker, who bases his opinion. on what the left-wing loons say your opinion should be.

Note that you immediately went to name calling because you couldn't deny what I wrote.

 

[cowslinger64]

And you completely blew off two instances of terrible behavior by republicans, on top of all the other, without a peep. You can't defend it.

I don’t think the republicans are angels, I’m a constitutionalists, I believe in the rules of law. But you can’t keep crying wolf and expect anyone to believe you. Schiff lied right out of the gate.

Typical trump ball licker.

See, your the one that stoops to calling names.[/QUOTE]


There's absolutely no way that is true.

 

[Klinkster]

Note that you immediately went to name calling because you couldn't deny what I wrote.

Nope.
You are more full of shit than a Christmas goose.

Name calling, and stupid memes, is all you do bugfucker.

Please pound sand up your tiny little ass.

 

[Klinkster]

See, your the one that stoops to calling names.

There's absolutely no way that is true.[/QUOTE]


What is true, is you are a ball of shit dung roller.
And, and empty jockstrap.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Nope.
You are more full of shit than a Christmas goose.

Name calling, and stupid memes, is all you do bugfucker.

Please pound sand up your tiny little ass.

I haven't called you any names nor do I need to.

 

[icanhelp1]

See, your the one that stoops to calling names.

There's absolutely no way that is true.[/QUOTE]

No way what’s true?

 

[cowslinger64]

There's absolutely no way that is true.

No way what’s true?[/QUOTE]

I bolded your ridiculous claim.


Just in those two posts that you failed to call the gop out on their terrible behavior, is proof that you do not believe in the constitution.

 

[icanhelp1]

No way what’s true?

I bolded your ridiculous claim.


Just in those two posts that you failed to call the gop out on their terrible behavior, is proof that you do not believe in the constitution.[/QUOTE]


Not sure what you’re talking about? What #

 

[jaF0]

They're certainly on here enough, and stupid enough, to be queball alts.

Read back a bit. Looks like he/she/they flipped IDs in mid argument between posts. And now he/she/they posted ala Dumpling.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Except all he wanted was an announcement on CNN that Ukraine was investigating Joe Biden. He didn't even care if they did it or not.

What you think he cares about is irrelevant to what was asked.

It was not "Ukrainian shit." That's a bald-faced lie. It was "Bidens" and "Crowdstrike" or Zelensky's not getting the aid.

It's not a lie, you're in denial, just because it might make the Bidens look bad doesn't make it election interference.

Poor little Trump just cared so much about Ukrainian corruption. He couldn't help it if it impacted Joe Biden.

EXACTLY!!!

If that's a problem maybe (D)'z shouldn't try running someone who's doing shady shit in the Ukraine.

 

[jaF0]

I'm getting an ominous feeling. Somebody out there is going to take it upon themselves to solve this problem in their own way and Der Fuhrer is going to get in the history books one last time.

 

[OldJourno]

Nothing wrong here either...



Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Thursday night bragged about blocking President Barack Obama’s attempt to fill federal judicial vacancies for two years. Then, he laughed about it as he discussed the Republican Party’s effort to stack the courts with conservative judges under President Donald Trump.

“I was shocked that former President Obama left so many vacancies and didn’t try to fill those positions,” Fox News host Sean Hannity said to McConnell.

Obama didn’t leave those vacancies so much as he was blocked from filling them by a GOP-controlled Senate led by McConnell ― something the majority leader was quick to point out.

“I’ll tell you why,” he said. “I was in charge of what we did the last two years of the Obama administration.”

Then, he laughed:


https://www.yahoo.com/news/mitch-mcconnell-blocks-obama-laughs-082824451.html

When the roles are reversed the exact same thing happens.
I'm not surprised you don't know this.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I'm getting an ominous feeling. Somebody out there is going to take it upon themselves to solve this problem in their own way and Der Fuhrer is going to get in the history books one last time.

I wouldn't be shocked, but I hope not, that's the kinda thing that could lead to the kinda party your team is WOEFULLY ill-equipped to deal with.

 

[KeithD]

I'm getting an ominous feeling. Somebody out there is going to take it upon themselves to solve this problem in their own way and Der Fuhrer is going to get in the history books one last time.

Golf courses aren't the most healthy open areas for some folks to spend a lot of time. Just sayin'.

 

[schism666]

You are nothing but an empty jockstrap alt.

Please....go fuck yourself.

Dung beetle.

Unlike you, oh great needle-dick-bug-fucker, who bases his opinion. on what the left-wing loons say your opinion should be.

aren't you the snowflake who cries whenever someone goes ad hom? fucking hypocritical rightie.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

I know what he cared about because ofthe sworn testimony of individuals who testified to exactly what he told them he cared about. ANd it is relevant: he asked only for the announcement to CNN of investigations into Biden, and he did not care if they were even carried out. The "ask" was the interview with CNN, not "investigation into Ukrainian corruption."

What you think he cares about is irrelevant to what was asked.

Yes it is a lie. He never used the word "corruption" with Zelensky. He never said a thing about "Ukranian corruption." He said "we" have a problem and it's "our" concern and Zelensky needed to do a favor for "us"-- Not Ukraine. He didn't ask about generalized corruption. He asked specifically about the Bidens and Burisma.

The Bidens were never a tangent to a more general ask about "corruption." Total lie.

It's not a lie, you're in denial, just because it might make the Bidens look bad doesn't make it election interference.

If Joe Biden did something "shady," that is a matter for the DOJ and the FBI, not POTUS. If Joe Biden did something shady, there are plenty of official channels for that to be looked into. Using the office of POTUS to Strongarm a vulnerable leader of a foreign country is not one of them. Holding military aid up as a bribe is also not one of them.

But it's good to know Mr. USA believes POTUS should be able to command foreign countries or anyone to investigate private individuals and violate individual rights. Hey, if POTUS says there's something shady, then fuck individual rights and the rule of law. Good to know when the next D President decides to go after people like you.

EXACTLY!!!

If that's a problem maybe (D)'z shouldn't try running someone who's doing shady shit in the Ukraine.

 

[BotanyBoy]

This is the best one yet!!!

he asked only for the announcement to CNN of investigations into Biden, and he did not care if they were even carried out.

So? That's politics, not a crime.

Yes it is a lie. He never used the word "corruption" with Zelensky. He never said a thing about "Ukranian corruption."

Didn't have to, doesn't make it not Ukrainian.

If Joe Biden did something "shady," that is a matter for the DOJ and the FBI, not POTUS.

The DOJ is an executive office....guess who the head of the executive branch is??

https://media2.giphy.com/media/26tknCqiJrBQG6bxC/giphy.gif


BTW, the DOJ and FBI don't get to investigate what's going on in the Ukraine.

But it's good to know Mr. USA believes POTUS should be able to command foreign countries or anyone to investigate private individuals and violate individual rights.

Asking isn't commanding anything, and private individuals don't have individual rights from foreign governments for in those governments countries/jurisdictions.

Foreign governments are NOT bound to respect the rights that the US government does. You become subject to their laws when you're in their country.

Hey, if POTUS says there's something shady, then fuck individual rights and the rule of law. Good to know when the next D President decides to go after people like you.

He didn't fuck individual rights or the rule of law.

What rights of who did he violate by asking Ukraine to look into shady activities going on in the Ukraine??

D president couldn't come after me in a foreign country either, not without creating a heinous stink, he'd almost certainly ask whatever nation I was in to do it the investigating/arrest. If they are good friends and he promises not to execute me like with the UK, they might let one of our agents observe and escort me back.

Again....just because it makes the Bidens look like shit doesn't make it a crime.

 

[icanhelp1]

Golf courses aren't the most healthy open areas for some folks to spend a lot of time. Just sayin'.

Sure hope you and you're unamerican buddy Jeffro have an inconvenient appointment with the secret service.

 

[icanhelp1]

I know what he cared about because ofthe sworn testimony of individuals who testified to exactly what he told them he cared about. ANd it is relevant: he asked only for the announcement to CNN of investigations into Biden, and he did not care if they were even carried out. The "ask" was the interview with CNN, not "investigation into Ukrainian corruption."



Yes it is a lie. He never used the word "corruption" with Zelensky. He never said a thing about "Ukranian corruption." He said "we" have a problem and it's "our" concern and Zelensky needed to do a favor for "us"-- Not Ukraine. He didn't ask about generalized corruption. He asked specifically about the Bidens and Burisma.

The Bidens were never a tangent to a more general ask about "corruption." Total lie.



If Joe Biden did something "shady," that is a matter for the DOJ and the FBI, not POTUS. If Joe Biden did something shady, there are plenty of official channels for that to be looked into. Using the office of POTUS to Strongarm a vulnerable leader of a foreign country is not one of them. Holding military aid up as a bribe is also not one of them.

But it's good to know Mr. USA believes POTUS should be able to command foreign countries or anyone to investigate private individuals and violate individual rights. Hey, if POTUS says there's something shady, then fuck individual rights and the rule of law. Good to know when the next D President decides to go after people like you.

Obama and Hillary both went after Trump and his campaign. Incoherent banter as usual, all bluster no substance. You should sit with Harpy and let him tutor you on our laws and how our legal system works.

 

[jomar]

Obama and Hillary both went after Trump and his campaign. Incoherent banter as usual, all bluster no substance. You should sit with Harpy and let him tutor you on our laws and how our legal system works.

LOL...good one!

 

[jp55665566]

Democrats

http://gravitateonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/lemmings.png

 

[phrodeau]

Obama and Hillary both went after Trump and his campaign. Incoherent banter as usual, all bluster no substance. You should sit with Harpy and let him tutor you on our laws and how our legal system works.

Trump went after both Obama and Hillary, in case you hadn’t noticed.

 

[jaF0]

And then, Little Donnie .... you know, there was Bobby and then there wasn't. Say all you want, but nobody will ever convince me that Bobby wasn't done by the powers to keep him from moving up.

I don't see any good coming in the next few years and the history books could place a lot of it on Moscow Mitch.

 

[Adre]

Trump says:

Someday there will be a Democratic President and a Republican House and they may remember this.

We know, moron, it was 1998.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Again....just because it makes the Bidens look like shit doesn't make it a crime.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/alfaHiEiNrkIg/source.gif