███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████
- Thread starter RoryN
- Start date
RoryN
You're screwed.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2003
- Posts
- 61,338
IrezumiKiss
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Posts
- 74,229
hehehehehe.
The "last" time "somebody" was this "infatuated" with this "thread" that he "tried" but couldn't "commandeer," he "had" a "totally" different "handle."
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif
The "last" time "somebody" was this "infatuated" with this "thread" that he "tried" but couldn't "commandeer," he "had" a "totally" different "handle."
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif
Even he can't believe the bullshit he's peddling. If he can't be "indicted" until he's out of office, he can still be "impeached" if there was anything of substance in the Mueller report.
But there wasn't.
icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 20,141
Nobby says Russia colluded with the Trump campaign but couldn't indict while in office. Why didn't they bring it up while Trump was campaigning and not in office. OH I know!! that was part of the set up!!!
Pookie
Chop!! Chop!!
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2002
- Posts
- 58,778
Obviously. *nods*
Conager
¿Que? Cornelius!
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2014
- Posts
- 18,282
Hard to say what all if the nitwits in this thread actually believe. Its clear what they want others to believe. How much of that is self-deception and delusion and how much of that is Bluster and putting on a brave face after an ignominious defeat is hard to say.
In the Mueller report itself even Weisman had that same level of bluster when he invented the standard of "not being able to exonerate, either."
It looks like they're going to impeach on even less evidence in a bigger or would that be smaller nothingburger so they need to pretend that the Mueller investigation yielded anything but some process crimes that occurred in an investigation that never should have happened..
RobDownSouth
BoycotDivestSanctio
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 78,395
jaF0
Moderator
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Posts
- 39,168
If there's nothing of substance in it, why is Barr still trying to keep it buried?
"Judge Asked to Keep Mueller Grand Jury Evidence Secret
The Justice Department urged a federal judge Tuesday not to look to the history books in deciding whether to hand over secret material from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation to the House Judiciary Committee, saying the court in 1974 was wrong to release grand jury evidence during Watergate."
"Judge Asked to Keep Mueller Grand Jury Evidence Secret
The Justice Department urged a federal judge Tuesday not to look to the history books in deciding whether to hand over secret material from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation to the House Judiciary Committee, saying the court in 1974 was wrong to release grand jury evidence during Watergate."
LincolnDuncan
Thread hijacker
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2015
- Posts
- 6,648
It was obvious that Trump obstructed justice with his efforts to get McGann and Lewandowski to fire Mueller.
RoryN
You're screwed.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2003
- Posts
- 61,338
Judge says Justice Department must give House evidence from Mueller grand jury, citing 'potentially impeachable conduct' by Trump
A federal judge on Friday said that the U.S. Justice Department must give the House Judiciary Committee normally secret grand jury material collected as part of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.
Judge Beryl Howell, in her ruling, repeatedly noted that the House is conducting an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, which could be assisted with the material assembled by Mueller's probe.
"The need for continued secrecy is minimal and thus easily outweighed by [the Judiciary Committee's] HJC's compelling need for the material," Howell wrote in the decision issued in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., where she is chief judge.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/25/jud...eller-material-citing-impeachment-chance.html
Boxlicker101
Licker of Boxes
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2003
- Posts
- 33,665
I'm surprised you say "Flaunting" when you apparently mean "flouting."
zipman
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2002
- Posts
- 38,552
Judge says Justice Department must give House evidence from Mueller grand jury, citing 'potentially impeachable conduct' by Trump
A federal judge on Friday said that the U.S. Justice Department must give the House Judiciary Committee normally secret grand jury material collected as part of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.
Judge Beryl Howell, in her ruling, repeatedly noted that the House is conducting an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, which could be assisted with the material assembled by Mueller's probe.
"The need for continued secrecy is minimal and thus easily outweighed by [the Judiciary Committee's] HJC's compelling need for the material," Howell wrote in the decision issued in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., where she is chief judge.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/25/jud...eller-material-citing-impeachment-chance.html
I think this is why Pelosi has been slowing the process down a bit.
Boxlicker101
Licker of Boxes
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2003
- Posts
- 33,665
If Trump had wanted Mueller to be fired, he could have done it himself.
Last edited:
Boxlicker101
Licker of Boxes
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2003
- Posts
- 33,665
Even a biased source such as this one says there was no proof of collusion.
But Mueller did not charge or suggest charges for anyone on one of the biggest questions he faced: whether the Trump campaign worked with the Russians to influence the election.
Mueller’s report, which he submitted to Attorney General William Barr on Friday, did not conclude that Trump or anyone involved in his campaign colluded with Russia, according to a summary Barr delivered to Congress on Sunday. (Mueller’s report left open the question of whether Trump obstructed justice in the course of the investigation, according to Barr’s summary.)
Last edited:
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 68,752
Judge says Justice Department must give House evidence from Mueller grand jury, citing 'potentially impeachable conduct' by Trump
A federal judge on Friday said that the U.S. Justice Department must give the House Judiciary Committee normally secret grand jury material collected as part of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.
Judge Beryl Howell, in her ruling, repeatedly noted that the House is conducting an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, which could be assisted with the material assembled by Mueller's probe.
"The need for continued secrecy is minimal and thus easily outweighed by [the Judiciary Committee's] HJC's compelling need for the material," Howell wrote in the decision issued in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., where she is chief judge.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/25/jud...eller-material-citing-impeachment-chance.html
It will be reversed on appeal.
Yup.
This TDS suffering judge, will get overruled.
Seems he doesn't care about the law.
schism666
cold and ugly
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Posts
- 12,535
no it won't.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 68,752
Wish that it won't in one hand, and shit in your other hand.
Report back to us which one gets full first.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 68,752
Barack Obama Deep State stooge.
schism666
cold and ugly
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Posts
- 12,535
it's been decided.
Shit yourself didn't ya?
Similar threads
