███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

[Shelly2inme]

This is pathetic but also very funny

This whole investigation is pathetic but also funny. Historians will have a blast with all of this. Obviously the results of the investigation were not what they were hoping for. Now as it flips around and sends them to prison it will be fascinating to see their panic. It is also cool that this has helped expose the fake media. Only the most hypnotized could still be watching CNN these days.

 

[jomar]

You should feel bad for the thousands of innocent Enron employees who lost their jobs because of that scumbag Weissman. Weissman should have been disbarred, instead, he's back perpetuating more partisan chicanery and trying to exact revenge for Hillary's lost election. Nadler is already 6 steps too far in political quicksand and is going to ruin any chances of success in 2020. This investigation is all about revenge, not justice. There are several player who used the DOJ and the NSA to sabotage Trumps chances and enhance Hillary's. Chickens are coming home to roost.

Oh, I do feel bad for people impacted by Enron.

Reading up on Weissmann.

Even if the investigation is about revenge, as you say, it doesn’t mean Trump didn’t cross legal lines.

 

[jomar]

Earlier I had referred to the President's article i authority, I meant Article II authority. My apologies to all and to Jomar.

Thank you, sir! You do yourself proud and are a prince among men! Until the next name calling begins, of course.

 

[icanhelp1]

This whole investigation is pathetic but also funny. Historians will have a blast with all of this. Obviously the results of the investigation were not what they were hoping for. Now as it flips around and sends them to prison it will be fascinating to see their panic. It is also cool that this has helped expose the fake media. Only the most hypnotized could still be watching CNN these days.

The scope of impropriety is beyond Watergate and Whitewater combined. It is deeply rooted in the Obama administration and 'COVERTLY' enabled by Obama's DOJ and NSA prosecuted by the like of Weissman and Jeannie Rhee both Hillary confidants and paid for by the DNC.

 

[moarBB]

Oh, I do feel bad for people impacted by Enron.

Reading up on Weissmann.

Even if the investigation is about revenge, as you say, it doesn’t mean Trump didn’t cross legal lines.

as EVERYONE on the team was AGAINST Trump and PRO CuntClinton, if they found ANYTHING they woulda nailed him

 

[icanhelp1]

Oh, I do feel bad for people impacted by Enron.

Reading up on Weissmann.

Even if the investigation is about revenge, as you say, it doesn’t mean Trump didn’t cross legal lines.

Weissman would have you believe lines were crossed, that's a tactic he uses. The narrative use of (exonerated) is an opinion that does not belong in a criminal investigation. The rhetorical use of the OLC policy is a smoke screen to advance the narrative of "did not exonerate" to insert this whole fucking report into the political arena and continue to destroy Trump's presidency with the constant threat of impeachment. Once the conspiracy allegations were disproved the rest of the investigation was nothing more than process crimes minus the Russian indictments, Cohen and manafort prosecutions, which were legitimate. This bullshit of holding Trump accountable is going to boomerang on the democrats. The investigation on the investigators is going to be quite revealing.

 

[moarBB]

You should feel bad for the thousands of innocent Enron employees who lost their jobs because of that scumbag Weissman. Weissman should have been disbarred, instead, he's back perpetuating more partisan chicanery and trying to exact revenge for Hillary's lost election. Nadler is already 6 steps too far in political quicksand and is going to ruin any chances of success in 2020. This investigation is all about revenge, not justice. There are several player who used the DOJ and the NSA to sabotage Trumps chances and enhance Hillary's. Chickens are coming home to roost.

how about the tens of thousands at Arthur Anderson that lost pensions and equity, their whole lives work vanished overnight

when Courts overturned it, it was too late

Weissman walks free

An evil man

 

[icanhelp1]

how about the tens of thousands at Arthur Anderson that lost pensions and equity, their whole lives work vanished overnight

when Courts overturned it, it was too late

Weissman walks free

An evil man

You are correct 'SIR' My point is; Mueller selected this degenerate to run his investigation, it was a hatchet job right from the beginning and begs to question Robert Mueller's true intent and exposed his disdain for Trump. Non partisan report MY ASS!! Weissman knew the report would be made public so he salted it with opinions and innuendo, all of which do not belong in a criminal investigation, AND HE KNEW IT!!! Nadler is fucking stupid and got played by Weissman and the NSA.

 

[moarBB]

https://patriot.imgix.net/427738e6c1fd956c566c3583d6b8e7446dee142e7ed842fe64587f02fd4c94ac.jpg?w=1200&h=600

 

[icanhelp1]

https://patriot.imgix.net/427738e6c1fd956c566c3583d6b8e7446dee142e7ed842fe64587f02fd4c94ac.jpg?w=1200&h=600

A little tibbit. Nadler is petitioning the court for Grand Jury testimony to be released. Back during the Watergate proceedings, the house won it's case to procure Grand Jury testimony because the whole house and the DOJ went forward with the petition and impeachment proceedings were already started, here, Nadler is on his own. My humble opinion is, the courts will tell Nadler to go pound sand.

 

[HisArpy]

A little tibbit. Nadler is petitioning the court for Grand Jury testimony to be released. Back during the Watergate proceedings, the house won it's case to procure Grand Jury testimony because the whole house and the DOJ went forward with the petition and impeachment proceedings were already started, here, Nadler is on his own. My humble opinion is, the courts will tell Nadler to go pound sand.

It's 50/50 depending on who the judge is and his political leanings.

If you go straight by the law, Nadler is stuck with sand. Access to Grand Jury information requires "a judicial proceeding". Precedent says that an "impeachment inquiry" is the equivalent.

Nadler isn't conducting "an impeachment inquiry". He's even said so publicly. Just the other day he said that his committee is investigating the President's malfeasance and the investigation could lead to an impeachment inquiry.

Out of his own mouth, he says his committee isn't chartered to do what's required to gain access.

But there's that politically leaning judge to consider...

 

[icanhelp1]

It's 50/50 depending on who the judge is and his political leanings.

If you go straight by the law, Nadler is stuck with sand. Access to Grand Jury information requires "a judicial proceeding". Precedent says that an "impeachment inquiry" is the equivalent.

Nadler isn't conducting "an impeachment inquiry". He's even said so publicly. Just the other day he said that his committee is investigating the President's malfeasance and the investigation could lead to an impeachment inquiry.

Out of his own mouth, he says his committee isn't chartered to do what's required to gain access.

But there's that politically leaning judge to consider...

That's my point. Does Nadler have standing to request Grand Jury testimony without an impeachment proceeding and resistance from the DOJ. Will a judge find the Mueller report sufficient. I understand nothing is guaranteed, with the possibility of a hearing in front of an activist judge and all, it's a toss up and probably hasn't been tested and I don't believe it has precedent.

 

[HisArpy]

That's my point. Does Nadler have standing to request Grand Jury testimony without an impeachment proceeding and resistance from the DOJ. Will a judge find the Mueller report sufficient. I understand nothing is guaranteed, with the possibility of a hearing in front of an activist judge and all, it's a toss up and probably hasn't been tested and I don't believe it has precedent.

It's been litigated. Access to Grand Jury information requires a "judicial proceeding" of which Congress needs an "impeachment inquiry" to reach that level. A committee's "general investigation and oversight" is insufficient.

Yet, a politically motivated judge could say that Nadler's "malfeasance investigation" is "close enough" to qualify even if it doesn't actually or technically meet the necessary threshold.

SCOTUS would have to determine if that's the case or not. Based on the existing precedent, I would say it isn't, but this is Trump we're talking about. The ONLY President who is assumed to have committed a crime in order to justify opening an investigation to go find it. Three times now.

 

[Rightguide]

It's 50/50 depending on who the judge is and his political leanings.

If you go straight by the law, Nadler is stuck with sand. Access to Grand Jury information requires "a judicial proceeding". Precedent says that an "impeachment inquiry" is the equivalent.

Nadler isn't conducting "an impeachment inquiry". He's even said so publicly. Just the other day he said that his committee is investigating the President's malfeasance and the investigation could lead to an impeachment inquiry.

Out of his own mouth, he says his committee isn't chartered to do what's required to gain access.

But there's that politically leaning judge to consider...

I think they would shop for a political judge and he could rule against the President but it's hard to imagine the SCOTUS going along with a violation of their own political question doctrine.

 

[icanhelp1]

I think they would shop for a political judge and he could rule against the President but it's hard to imagine the SCOTUS going along with a violation of their own political question doctrine.

I think the DOJ can appeal the petition based on DC circuit court ruling in April which voted 2 to 1 that Grand Jury testimony cannot be made available solely for public consumption and the courts don't want to revisit that decision. So without an impeachment proceeding in hand I don't see how Nadler wins. I have no idea what the mechanism would be for SCOTUS involvement or intervention. The judge they petitioned is Chief Judge Beryl Howell of DC's federal district court.

 

[KeithD]

Goodness that's a long run of ranting and ignored Trumpettes this morning.

 

[Rightguide]

Goodness that's a long run of ranting and ignored Trumpettes this morning.

Not nearly as long as that dreadfully embarrassing trail of wet diapers you've strewn through dozens of threads.

 

[HisArpy]

Not nearly as long as that dreadfully embarrassing trail of wet diapers you've strewn through dozens of threads.

I keep wondering why he tries to insert himself into conversations he says he's ignoring.

Saying "go the fuck away" is NOT synonymous with stalking someone and posting signs with "I don't know what you're doing" on them in their yard.

 

[Que]

Even a dramatic reading by Mueller himself could not save Rory's thread from ignominy.

Sad!

 

[moarBB]

So when absolutely nothing comes of this what will be the reaction?

They will MAKE

MOAR

Shit up

 

[moarBB]

Something will come of it. There's too much smoke for no fire.

smoke was a family BBQ they all enjoyed

 

[Kantarii]

The funniest thing about this thread is starting at the beginning and reading through the comments since Mueller has testified

 

[Conager]

Remind me- what were the "results" of the Mueller "investigation?"

I'm still waiting for Rory to release the un-redacted thread title.

 

[phrodeau]

Remind me- what were the "results" of the Mueller "investigation?"

I'm still waiting for Rory to release the un-redacted thread title.

Here you go, idiot.

https://time.com/5556331/mueller-investigation-indictments-guilty-pleas/

 

[RobDownSouth]

Remind me- what were the "results" of the Mueller "investigation?"

The "results" were "unequivocable": Russia colluded with Donald Trump's "election" campaign, but the "President" could "not" be "indicted" while serving in "office"