Que
aʒɑ̃ prɔvɔkatœr
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Posts
- 39,882
Look sweety, I'm aware that you and the rest of the geebee goon squad made up your feeble minds that Director Mueller wasn't going to find evidence to indict Trump as soon as he was appointed so I have no inclination to try to convince you of anything. It is your right to wallow in your chosen ignorance. Enjoy
I think it's a question of questioning predication and motivation for investigation and any potential consequences that might fall out from that investigation.
When you start from the point of view that Trump is clearly a slippery individual and no doubt has probably done something that, if known, might well result in a public backlash justifiable in removing him from office. This is a strategy that Democrats have successfully used time and time again not just with actual impeachment but by having people resign by running people out of office here in Arizona we lost two Republican Governors to nonsense, where unlike Trump they let Democrats define them.
So Republicans from the very beginning looked at this as I did in on this form repeatedly when everybody was saying Russia Russia Russia I kept asking colluded with the Russians to do specifically what? None of that ever made sense before we knew whether he had talked to her Russian not talked to a Russian where the Russians and offered helped helped didn't help none of it made any sense because nothing about this election results had anything to do with anything that someone in Russia is going to know how to influence. None of them are going to be able to get Hillary to be an idiot and stay home from states that she should have won.
THAT is where we are coming from.
Your team can't even get rid of the guy with a freezer literally full of cash and Bob Menendez. So don't talk to me about caring about the rule of law. You don't. Not you specifically but the collective you