███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

It's not deflection, it's facing the reality that no one wants to go on record talking trash about someone in the spotlight. Especially in the political arena. "He's a good guy" is universal even if the speaker has no idea if it's true or not.

No one? No one at all? You respond to a statement about Mueller with a comment about Comey. Patent deflection.
 
Yet, you cower in fear before me.

If that bird had a massive, empty head.. that is EXACTLY how I picture you.


The "cower in fear" is a figment of your idiotic delusions..


Ready to fly, queball???
 
No one? No one at all? You respond to a statement about Mueller with a comment about Comey. Patent deflection.

Lol. keep dreaming because that's not what I said at all.

Yes, I mentioned Comey. However, if you go back and re-read what I posted, you'll notice that it was an allegory referring to how people are treating Mueller.

It's too bad that you're attempting to discuss politics without any real understanding of how to do that. Mostly because you have no idea how to have a discussion on the subject.


Please try to keep up with the rest of the class.
 
Lol. keep dreaming because that's not what I said at all.

Yes, I mentioned Comey. However, if you go back and re-read what I posted, you'll notice that it was an allegory referring to how people are treating Mueller.

It's too bad that you're attempting to discuss politics without any real understanding of how to do that. Mostly because you have no idea how to have a discussion on the subject.


Please try to keep up with the rest of the class.

Dood says:

"You respond to a statement about Mueller with a comment about Comey."

You say:


"keep dreaming because that's not what I said at all."

then:


"Yes, I mentioned Comey"

So, without moving any goalposts, in this context, what is the difference between "said" and "mentioned"???


Here's your class... the one you want everyone to keep up with. :rolleyes:

https://ethicsalarms.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/idiots.jpg
 
Last edited:
Dood says:

"You respond to a statement about Mueller with a comment about Comey."

You say:


"keep dreaming because that's not what I said at all."

then:


"Yes, I mentioned Comey"

So, without moving any goalposts, in this context, what is the difference between "said" and "mentioned"???


Here's your class... the one you want everyone to keep up with. :rolleyes:

https://ethicsalarms.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/idiots.jpg

Oh look, it's the parse words defense...
 
'
Just because you can't comprehend what's been said, doesn't mean that what's been said isn't comprehensible to others.

Please try to keep up.

So, without moving any goalposts, in this context, what is the difference between "said" and "mentioned"???


That was my question.. you couldn't answer it. That's not on me.


And you gotta do it without more bullshit. Which will be impossible.
 
What happened to "with the rest of the class?"

Is it recess for lunchtime already?

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

There are certain individuals in the world whose mental cognizance is limited by their inability to focus their concentration for any appreciable length of time in order to enhance their comprehension and mental retention of conceptual ideas upon which a future reduction of illogical dissonance is a necessary component of elucidation and edification as well as creating a foundation for enlightenment and successful critical thinking abilities and skills.

Or, IOW, I dumbed it down for the dummies who have short attention spans.

Or, to be more succinct: Please try to keep up with the rest of the class.
 
So, without moving any goalposts, in this context, what is the difference between "said" and "mentioned"???


That was my question.. you couldn't answer it. That's not on me.


And you gotta do it without more bullshit. Which will be impossible.

Oh lookie, moar of the word parsing defense.
 
LOLOLOL

Complaining about word parsing LOLOLOLOL

White privilege sound familiar?

That's in lieu of anything intelligent to add.

He's slamming the ball lickers too..

Even fox news gets it


https://www.yahoo.com/news/shepard-smith-fox-donald-trump-robert-mueller-044613684.html

Politics
Fox News' Shepard Smith Slams President's Baseless Attacks On 'Never-Trumper' Mueller
HuffPost Mary Papenfuss,HuffPost Fri, May 31 12:46 AM EDT
Reactions Reblog on Tumblr Share Tweet Email

Shepard Smith criticized Donald Trump on his Fox News program Thursday over the president’s often-repeated, baseless claims that Robert Mueller “had it out” for him.

Trump said again, without evidence, that the former special counsel, a lifelong Republican, was a “total conflicted person” and a “true never-Trumper” who was biased against him from the start. “Despite that,” the president gloated on Thursday, Mueller “got nothing” damaging on the president (which he did).

Trump also insisted again that Mueller had a grudge against him because the president didn’t pick him as FBI director — a job he claims Mueller “wanted very badly.”

“Of course there’s no evidence this story is true,” said Smith. Smith cited former White House strategist Steve Bannon’s observation that Mueller had never sought the job.

Smith also pointed out that Trump has claimed that Mueller “loves” James Comey, whom Trump fired as FBI director.
 
Back
Top