███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

[RobDownSouth]

Yeah but your's doesn't have a relationship with the truth.

Hey Gunny, looks like Commander Trump is gearing up for "pre-emptive" was with Venezuela (after all, they still have some oil).

Are you in favor of putting troops in harms way right before the 2020 elections?

 

[HisArpy]

And then there's the fact that if Nadler issues the sub P, AND Barr doesn't show up after that, then the entire House has to vote on whether to hold him in contempt. And then, if he's held in contempt of Congress;

a) The contempt referral goes to him to follow up on or disregard;

b) Trump can pardon him for it at any time.

IOW, the whackjob D's on the House Judiciary committee can go pound sand. Even their pro-Get-Trump! media outlets are laughing at them over this crap.

 

[Que]

And then there's the fact that if Nadler issues the sub P, AND Barr doesn't show up after that, then the entire House has to vote on whether to hold him in contempt. And then, if he's held in contempt of Congress;

a) The contempt referral goes to him to follow up on or disregard;

b) Trump can pardon him for it at any time.

IOW, the whackjob D's on the House Judiciary committee can go pound sand. Even their pro-Get-Trump! media outlets are laughing at them over this crap.

What Would Holder Do?

 

[Adre]

And then there's the fact that if Nadler issues the sub P, AND Barr doesn't show up after that, then the entire House has to vote on whether to hold him in contempt. And then, if he's held in contempt of Congress;

a) The contempt referral goes to him to follow up on or disregard;

b) Trump can pardon him for it at any time.

IOW, the whackjob D's on the House Judiciary committee can go pound sand. Even their pro-Get-Trump! media outlets are laughing at them over this crap.

And this may play well with you and the rest of his base, but not so sure the other 62% of voters will be as amused by a lawless AG.

 

[HisArpy]

More alt facts to live by.

A subpoena was issued for the unredacted report. And he most definitely can be held in contempt for ignoring that.

NO, he can't.

Nadler isn't entitled to the fully unredacted report. He has to get a court order before he can see some of the redactions. He ain't got one. Thus, Barr is fully within the law to withhold the unredacted report and Nadler can go pound sand.

PLUS: There's another mostly unredacted report (98% readable) available in a SCIF room that D's can go see any time they want. NONE, NOT A SINGLE DEMOCRAT, has gone to look at it.

What's that tell you?

 

[HisArpy]

And this may play well with you and the rest of his base, but not so sure the other 62% of voters will be as amused by a lawless AG.

He hasn't been proven to be "lawless". So far, he's within the scope of his duties and the law.

 

[Adre]

He hasn't been proven to be "lawless". So far, he's within the scope of his duties and the law.

Give him time, he’s treading on thin ice.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Yeah but your's doesn't have a relationship with the truth.

Trump, Barr and the rest of the pirate ship of state have a hostile relationship with the truth

 

[HisArpy]

Give him time, he’s treading on thin ice.

You wish. Even the progressive opinion writers are lambasting Nadler and the rest for their amateur hour crap yesterday and this morning.

 

[cowslinger64]

He forgets the word was first employed against Trump by his own left wing media.

It was first brought up by the Washington Examiner..a right wing slanting newspaper.

Wrong again, vette.

Yeah but your's doesn't have a relationship with the truth.

Like your version of the truth???

 

[cowslinger64]

NO, he can't.

Nadler isn't entitled to the fully unredacted report. He has to get a court order before he can see some of the redactions. He ain't got one. Thus, Barr is fully within the law to withhold the unredacted report and Nadler can go pound sand.

PLUS: There's another mostly unredacted report (98% readable) available in a SCIF room that D's can go see any time they want. NONE, NOT A SINGLE DEMOCRAT, has gone to look at it.

What's that tell you?

How bout something to back that up? Link?

 

[Que]

How bout something to back that up? Link?

You must try really really hard to avoid actual news sources.

This link will tell you absolutely everything you need to know: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=T1XgFsitnQw

 

[Que]

Give him time, he’s treading on thin ice.

I'm sure you're right. A former long-serving attorney-general probably doesn't know nearly as much about how to avoid skating on that thin ice in the law as saying you do.

 

[cowslinger64]

You must try really really hard to avoid actual news sources.

You've got it? Let's see it.

 

[cowslinger64]

I'm sure you're right. A former long-serving attorney-general probably doesn't know nearly as much about how to avoid skating on that thin ice in the law as saying you do.

Certainly more than a minimum wage uber driver with a 20 year old car with 30000000000 miles on it does.

 

[RobDownSouth]

First he hasn't been issued a subpoena so he didn't ignore anything. Second he can't be issued a subpoena for not showing up today because he was not invited to testify, he volunteered.

Wrong again.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler has subpoenaed Barr and the Justice Department for the full report and Mueller’s underlying evidence. The deadline for compliance is May 1.

LINK

 

[Que]

You've got it? Let's see it.

Again: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=T1XgFsitnQw

 

[cowslinger64]

Again: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=T1XgFsitnQw

So, per usual, you've got nuthin. Just like the other morons.


You had a chance to show your work here, instead more garbage.

 

[Que]

All this rabid frothing-at-the-mouth is actually funny. The reason you people are Democrats is because you're incapable of following a logical line of thought to its logical conclusion

Pretend that you're right about every single thing that you posted in this thread that hasn't been 100% disproven by the Mueller report already. Let's assume that you get absolutely everything you want and that your weird interpretations about the laws, what it says, what you can and can't charge people with is 100% on point.

You already know what the end result of this is. Let's say that you even managed to run Barr out of office and you're really going to get Trump now.

You already know what the actual conclusion would be from Mueller himself it once you've read every single redacted word in the report. You already have every incident that you could possibly point to that you might wish to claim obstruction of justice where there is no underlying crime to cover up you already have that whole thing you have testimony that would have been privileged at the way Obama refused to give up those conversations those emails with close advisors Trump didn't have any executive privilege claims at all you have it all there's nothing else to get you have every word that you could use to impeach him with.

And you're not doing that.

So do it. I double dog dare you.

 

[Que]

So, per usual, you've got nuthin. Just like the other morons.


You had a chance to show your work here, instead more garbage.

You had a chance to use google: Democrats refuse less-redacted report shows pages of links. Pick one.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-decline-barrs-offer-to-view-a-less-redacted-mueller-report/

If there was something that suddenly changes what the actual conclusions that have been fully released that Mueller and his team of democrat lawyers concluded they would know by looking at the minimally redacted portions.

They don't want to know what is <not> in those REDACTED sections. They want to pretend there is something there and get you idiots to buy that there's something earth-shattering in there that wouldn't be covered by the conclusions written by Muller & Company.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

All this rabid frothing-at-the-mouth is actually funny. The reason you people are Democrats is because you're incapable of following a logical line of thought to its logical conclusion

Pretend that you're right about every single thing that you posted in this thread that hasn't been 100% disproven by the Mueller report already. Let's assume that you get absolutely everything you want and that your weird interpretations about the laws, what it says, what you can and can't charge people with is 100% on point.

You already know what the end result of this is. Let's say that you even managed to run Barr out of office and you're really going to get Trump now.

You already know what the actual conclusion would be from Mueller himself it once you've read every single redacted word in the report. You already have every incident that you could possibly point to that you might wish to claim obstruction of justice where there is no underlying crime to cover up you already have that whole thing you have testimony that would have been privileged at the way Obama refused to give up those conversations those emails with close advisors Trump didn't have any executive privilege claims at all you have it all there's nothing else to get you have every word that you could use to impeach him with.

And you're not doing that.

So do it. I double dog dare you.

So, rabid frothing-at-the-mouth must translate better on twitter

 

[cowslinger64]

You had a chance to use google: Democrats refuse less-redacted report shows pages of links. Pick one.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democrats-decline-barrs-offer-to-view-a-less-redacted-mueller-report/

If there was something that suddenly changes what the actual conclusions that have been fully released that Mueller and his team of democrat lawyers concluded they would know by looking at the minimally redacted portions.

They don't want to know what is <not> in those REDACTED sections. They want to pretend there is something there and get you idiots to buy that there's something earth-shattering in there that wouldn't be covered by the conclusions written by Muller & Company.

That's not what he claimed, dumbass. There isn't anything either myself or you could find that offers 98 percent unredacted. Which is bullshit and thanks for confirming.

If you think they Trump, his newfound buddy barr and the republicans aren't hiding something here..You're dumber, more naive and a bigger hack than I figured possible.

 

[Que]

So, rabid frothing-at-the-mouth must translate better on twitter

Seems to be the depth of understanding of most people these days on any given subject. I would ordinarily not count you in that particular grouping. Some of your post as of late though seem to show a lot of frustration and not as much understanding of the actual underlying issues.

I think some people who tend to be fairly interested in the increasingly rare in-depth pieces are a little burned out. I know I am because I tend to skim a lot of it.

My take on this is my skim is better than your skim because for the moment the facts are on quote unquote my sides quote unquote team. Your side is understandably demoralized because impeachments never going to happen so therefore there's an awful lot of Hail Marys being thrown up.

 

[contrifan32]

Wrong again.

LINK

Did you read the article you referenced?

The Democrats "are objecting to the trailer after the movie was released."

 

[HisArpy]

That's not what he claimed, dumbass. There isn't anything either myself or you could find that offers 98 percent unredacted. Which is bullshit and thanks for confirming.

If you think they Trump, his newfound buddy barr and the republicans aren't hiding something here..You're dumber, more naive and a bigger hack than I figured possible.

This is what happens when you expect to be spoon fed information - you fail.
Here's your linky:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/19/us/politics/redacted-mueller-report.html

Which says:

About 10 percent of the special counsel’s 448-page report is blacked out...

18 percent of the redactions were based on legal rules that generally forbid the disclosure of grand jury material.

Do the math airhead.

It works out to be only 1.8 percent of the entire document being redacted because of sealed Grand Jury testimony. You can also do the math from there to discover (amazingly) that 100 minus 1.8 percent equals 98.2 percent.



Pardon me while I laugh in your face some more.