HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 43,947
You're the idiots that keep bringing up collusion.. Parroting the orange train wreck.
I cannot believe what a fuckin moron you are.
Uh huh.
Pardon me while I laugh in your face...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're the idiots that keep bringing up collusion.. Parroting the orange train wreck.
I cannot believe what a fuckin moron you are.
Lying about what is in Mueller's letter has replaced lying about what is in Mueller's report as America's favorite sport.
I guess according to Barr, the fact that Trump didn't simply shut down the investigation means he "cooperated" with Mueller? Mueller wanted to speak to Trump; Trump refused. That's hardly cooperation.
Uh huh.
Pardon me while I laugh in your face...
Booby MuleLiar KNEW from early on there was no collusion
Nevertheless he persisted!
WHY?
LOCK
HIM
UP!
He forgets the word was first employed against Trump by his own left wing media.
Booker and Harris are two of the dumbest people to ever be elected to the United States Senate. They were only interested in spouting their demonstrable bullshit and weren't interested in hearing what Barr had to say. They love to advance bullshit and then deny a chance to respond by advancing yet another line of shit. Like when they accused him of suppressing the 19 pages of Mueller's comments and concerns that were in fact released by Barr as part of the 400 plus Mueller Report. They never read the report. Then there was the crazy slanderous shit pile Masquerading as a Senator from Hawaii.![]()
Heh. Harris destroyed him, and Barr, while obviously a stooge for a criminal president, is no dummy. What she'd do in debate to a (by next fall) 74-year-man dealing with early-stage dementia is scary to contemplate.
Heh. Harris destroyed him, and Barr, while obviously a stooge for a criminal president, is no dummy. What she'd do in debate to a (by next fall) 74-year-man dealing with early-stage dementia is scary to contemplate.

It was first brought up by the Washington Examiner..a right wing slanting newspaper.
Wrong again, vette.
Heh. Harris destroyed him, and Barr, while obviously a stooge for a criminal president, is no dummy. What she'd do in debate to a (by next fall) 74-year-man dealing with early-stage dementia is scary to contemplate.
Why do you think the Democrats are so busy savaging Barr's reputation?
Because they know his investigation is going to go where they don't want it to go.
The guy who is most savaging Barr’s reputation is Barr.Why do you think the Democrats are so busy savaging Barr's reputation?
Because they know his investigation is going to go where they don't want it to go.
So you're saying that for the past 2 years, the MSM has been LYING TO US about how Mueller is investigating "collusion"?
Shocking. But then, we told you that too.
The years 2017 and 2018 might have led the Trump administration to believe that it can issue orders to the House of Representatives, but that's not actually true.
The consequences for Barr ignoring a subpoena should be the same as it would be for any of us.
The years 2017 and 2018 might have led the Trump administration to believe that it can issue orders to the House of Representatives, but that's not actually true.
The consequences for Barr ignoring a subpoena should be the same as it would be for any of us.
The years 2017 and 2018 might have led the Trump administration to believe that it can issue orders to the House of Representatives, but that's not actually true.
The consequences for Barr ignoring a subpoena should be the same as it would be for any of us.
First he hasn't been issued a subpoena so he didn't ignore anything. Second he can't be issued a subpoena for not showing up today because he was not invited to testify, he volunteered.
Better fishing metaphor:
https://i.imgur.com/q7mJUs9.jpg