LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Kreepy Kavanaugh

wizzard426 said:
Let's see. I was looking at the scorecard.

The Dims:

1) selected a loose little schoolgirl to cry rape based on her husband's subliminal suggestion to deflect from his cuck fetish in counselling.

2) sends in creepy porn lawyer that negotiates porn star salaries based on current cup size and length of BBC they want

3) crazy chrissy can't remember chit

4) All of the sudden 3 more show up and just as quickly all disappear after scrutiny shows one to be borderline criminally insane, a second one bragged about being campus rape party queen.

For the record it was ( I was there, saw and left) a game called "Button Button" several girls would get a drink from the bar, one had a "red" in it and then the "winner" was carried away with the frat boys. "REDS" back in the day was a cap of secanol sodium, usually in the 100 mg. The girls playing knew what was up.

Or, you can "not play" and sit in your dorm.

5) despite all of the bluff, lies and bravado the man stands in your face, wins against the odds

6) you folk can't seem to figure out it doesn't matter if you are stabbed, shot or fucked. You lost.

7) losers don't get meat or pudding

8) now what? And then?

9) one thing is comming from this. Jump the wrong way, say the wrong thing, harm anyone.

10) just remember. You wanted this.
Click to expand...


Remember this bullshit when the pendulum swings back.
 
I been AXING why she waited 11 yrs to tell hubby, now we know

oh I see

she brought it up in 2012, cause they were gonna remodel the house...add another room n more doors...... cause she felt cooped up cause of BK and needed a bldg permit, THATS why she mentioned it 2012 to hubby

Oh, ok, that makes some sense




But WAIT.......Hark, what have we here?

The remodel permit was issued in 2008..........

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...she-linked-to-kavanaugh-was-in-2008-not-2012/


GASP!

The question is raised again

WHY BE SILENT FOR 11 YEARS???????????
 
nowisthetime said:
No one should be surprised when the trashiest of trash on the GB support this scummy man. I've chalked them up to be garbage.


Well shit, take that back, garbage has a special purpose, they don't.
Click to expand...

You Do realize that you’re talking to StainMan, don’t you?

Oh wait. You’re the one who kept encouraging both of them to harass us
with racist, xenophobic And misogynistic shit.
 
GoFundMe Donations For Kavanaugh Accuser Skyrocket After Mention In Testimony


Why would she come forward if she’s not telling the truth? Well, check the financial incentive.

over $1 million!
 
Que said:
Maybe book an appointment with "Doctor" Ford to deal with your projection issues?
Click to expand...

Why are you putting “Doctor” in quotes?

Do you no longer believe she has a doctorate?

Who and what are you trying to insult, exactly?
 
Oblimo said:
Oh, for fuck’s sake.

And I thought you couldn’t be any more full of shit than you already were.
Click to expand...

Suspicious death? Typical repug paranoia, no wonder studies show they have more nightmares.


Let those two apologist dumbfucks banter with each other.

My God, I had never realized human beings could be so DUMB!
 
The disgraceful republicans

"The clearest proof that the party's old claim to morality has been flushed out with the Trump revolution is a new NPR/PBS News Hour/Marist poll with a mind-boggling result: A majority of Republicans -- 54% -- say that if Ford is telling the truth, Kavanaugh should still be confirmed."

Let that sink in for a moment. 54% of republicans still think Kavanaugh should be confirmed even if he did try and sexually assault Ford.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/27/opin...s-indicted-themselves-frida-ghitis/index.html
 
Mello_SixtyNine said:
I do know that no prosecutor in their right mind would take this to trial without any evidence that can be corroborated, much less baseless allegations that don't even have the basic facts. Where it happened. When it happened. Who was there that witnessed the events.
Click to expand...

Not this shit again. Google the One Witness Rule. There’s a fascinating story behind it. For centuries, judging someone based on a single witness was considered a sin. (Although, in Medieval English law courts, a “jury” was at first any twelve (landed) men the plaintiff could find who’d swear he were a truthful fellow.) Nowadays, it is technically possible to convict someone on the testimony of a single witness, but a lot of Americans have been raised to believe the account of just one person is insufficient, so in voire dire prosecutors with a single witness identifying the defendant like to ask, “Would you be able to convict someone of a crime on the word of a single person?” or similar, and there is great debate over whether a prosecutor should be allowed to ask the question,

But, for sure, Ford’s testimony as it stands now is totally insufficient to establish necessary facts. I found her testimony credible enough to warrant further investigation, however, while yesterday Kavanaugh did a great impression an angry, entitled preppy douchenozzel and did himself no favors.

In other words, I am withholding my personal judgement to see what the investigation finds.

But in general, a witness can provide their own foundation. “It was five o’clock on the dot, I remember because I checked my watch,” for example, is sufficient to establish the time of what the witness is describing. You don’t need “corroborating” evidence. You sure as hell want it, though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

gotsnowgotslush
What is Normal, in 2018 ?
Replies
15
Views
2K
Kirkrapine
K
LincolnDuncan
How'bout that
Replies
12
Views
1K
LincolnDuncan
LincolnDuncan
K
13 Facts About America Conservatives Would Like You to Forget
15 16 17
Replies
400
Views
16K
jeninflorida
jeninflorida
busybody..
Denies Senate Judiciary Request to Investigate New Black Panther Case
Replies
3
Views
363
busybody..
busybody..
E
9/11summary
Replies
20
Views
1K
eyer
E
Back
Top