Will Gay Sex Be Outlawed Now That It Causes Cancer?

Are you serious? Do you really want me to list the gay men/lesbian women/bisexual people/trans folk that I'm friends with? Would you like them divided into subsets of 'previous flatmates; close friends; acquaintances; work colleagues; my offspring' or as a percentage of my Facebook friends?

As they probably don't exist.:rolleyes::D
 
Are you serious? Do you really want me to list the gay men/lesbian women/bisexual people/trans folk that I'm friends with? Would you like them divided into subsets of 'previous flatmates; close friends; acquaintances; work colleagues; my offspring' or as a percentage of my Facebook friends?

(Also, didn't you call me out not ten minutes ago for using 'anecdotal evidence' to prove a point.)

You directly challenged my knowledge of the gay lifestyle. That required a personal response. I did not lead with it.
 
I've been room mates with gay men on two separate occasions and was a bouncer at a gay bar and then at a lesbian bar. I am very familiar with the gay nightclub scene.


What's your exposure?


Will and Grace???

And to stay on actual point, in reference to this 'gay lifestyle' of which you're so clearly well informed ... what's your actual argument here? Because I'm kind of reading it as 'if people have lots of sex, they sort of deserve a high incidence of STI's, because of the 'lifestyle' they've chosen'.
 
You directly challenged my knowledge of the gay lifestyle. That required a personal response. I did not lead with it.

I didn't challenge your knowledge of 'the gay lifestyle' ... I was challenging your use of such a dumb arse phrase.
 
And to stay on actual point, in reference to this 'gay lifestyle' of which you're so clearly well informed ... what's your actual argument here? Because I'm kind of reading it as 'if people have lots of sex, they sort of deserve a high incidence of STI's, because of the 'lifestyle' they've chosen'.

:rolleyes:

"All men face certain health risks. However, gay men and men who have sex with men have some specific health concerns."

Redneck translation: Additional

http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-l...-depth/health-issues-for-gay-men/art-20047107


Mayo Clinic pretty credible?
 
Americans prefer straight talk.

I don't have a problem with straight talk, but I have a problem with suggesting there's a thing that's 'the gay lifestyle'. Is there a 'straight lifestyle' ... if so, I clearly missed the memo.
 
I don't have a problem with straight talk, but I have a problem with suggesting there's a thing that's 'the gay lifestyle'. Is there a 'straight lifestyle' ... if so, I clearly missed the memo.

There are both. Sounds like you're pretty naive.
 
Yes, I think we all know that. Again, what's your actual argument?

None really other than getting fucked in the ass on a regular basis has been a known health risk for years and that gay men engage in it more so than the general population, and yes, I get your argument that not all gay men engage in anal sex, but that is trying to make the exception the rule.


I do not, under any circumstance want to use government to enter their bedroom and tell them what they can and cannot do, but it cannot be denied that there are repercussions to certain behaviors, even for women, unless you wish to deny medical science (and some would say, even common sense; if the "arse-"hole were meant to be violated sexually, we would all have a g-spot there).


By Buddha's beatific bouncing burnished balls, all of this talk about arse products as my lunch has pronounced itself MRE...
 
Really? Please tell me what this 'straight lifestyle' looks like. Because I seem to have missed out on the invite.

Google is your friend, Kim. Now get on with it and stop pretending you don't have a brain of your own.
 
None really other than getting fucked in the ass on a regular basis has been a known health risk for years and that gay men engage in it more so than the general population, and yes, I get your argument that not all gay men engage in anal sex, but that is trying to make the exception the rule.


I do not, under any circumstance want to use government to enter their bedroom and tell them what they can and cannot do, but it cannot be denied that there are repercussions to certain behaviors, even for women, unless you wish to deny medical science (and some would say, even common sense; if the "arse-"hole were meant to be violated sexually, we would all have a g-spot there).


By Buddha's beatific bouncing burnished balls, all of this talk about arse products as my lunch has pronounced itself MRE...

OK ... it just sounded pretty moralistic to me. In fact, it sort of still does - "if the "arse-"hole were meant to be violated sexually, we would all have a g-spot there' - I guess you've never had anal sex (which, btw, if you enjoy it is enjoyable - no g-spot =/= no sensation), but you've never had a blow job? Because by your logic we shouldn't do that either, because no g spot?

I think you'll find that once a sub-group of the population - e.g. gay men, sex workers, etc - work out that a particular practice is detrimental to the health of that population, they pretty speedily work to resolve the situation. The problems are not so much the specific actions, but rather the easy access to the medical means to address the spread of disease. That's sort of why we have contraception - because straight people worked out that engaged in 'straight sex' resulted in often unintended consequences.
 
Back
Top