We just launched 43 Tomahawk missiles at Syria!

But, if we take out their guns with a first strike that won't happen

Which would require a massive air campaign. There are thousands of them and some locations aren't going to become known until they open fire.:)
 
don't bet we don't know where they are.

Wonder what would happen if they strapped your sorry coward as to a tommy hawk and sent you with it? A massive air attach is exactly what I was describing. But, then I'm sure you have no idea what that really means being you never served a day in service to your country.


Which would require a massive air campaign. There are thousands of them and some locations aren't going to become known until they open fire.:)
 
Wonder what would happen if they strapped your sorry coward as to a tommy hawk and sent you with it? A massive air attach is exactly what I was describing. But, then I'm sure you have no idea what that really means being you never served a day in service to your country.

Trouble is, somebody would have to hold me first.

Learn how to spell you ignorant turd.:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Apparently you've never heard of Zyklon B.:rolleyes:

Oh, I've heard of it, but it was never used on the battlefield, only in a certain program the Nazis were careful never to discuss publicly.

Before now, the only post-WWI use of poison gas in war that I've heard of was during Mussolini's conquest of Ethiopia.
 
Oh, I've heard of it, but it was never used on the battlefield, only in a certain program the Nazis were careful never to discuss publicly.

Before now, the only post-WWI use of poison gas in war that I've heard of was during Mussolini's conquest of Ethiopia.

Hitler, like Assad, used it against his own people.
 
Finding it strange that the US is attacking someone who is fighting ISIS .
 
1/2 ton bomb makes a crater big one. It will take more than a month to get that back up and usable. Plus we took out lots of their planes. Unless you know don't speak! You really show your ignorance

YOU sire need a English course or speech theory!! PLus you have no knowledge above 2nd grad!
I can't decide which of these I should have framed.
 
Finding it strange that the US is attacking someone who is fighting ISIS .

Tin pot fascist dictator, murderous terror organization. They're all the same. We (the West) is fighting totalitarianism be it terrorist or authoritarian regime based. Totalitarianism is the wests enemy. Be it leftists (USSR), rightists (NAZI Germany) or religious (Daesh).

The fucker used nerve gas on kids. I'm sure we can take a bit of time out of our busy bombing Daesh schedule to send a few Tomahawks his way.
 
Do we know that for certain?

What? Your going to blame rebels for it. Assad just happened to hit a rebel nerve gas supply dumb? Only folk who think that are Russkie bitches! The rest of the world knows who directed that attack. Get real!
 
What? Your going to blame rebels for it. Assad just happened to hit a rebel nerve gas supply dumb? Only folk who think that are Russkie bitches! The rest of the world knows who directed that attack. Get real!

Ahh.. So mister science and logic guy now simply assumes what he believes is obvious, all while suddenly calling us names.

And that's supposed to be credible?
 
Ahh.. So mister science and logic guy now simply assumes what he believes is obvious, all while suddenly calling us names.

And that's supposed to be credible?

Go bury your nose up Putin's backside with your excuses for Assad and his regime.
 
Go bury your nose up Putin's backside with your Assad excuses.

It is indeed ironic. The same crowd who insists on evidence, suddenly is certain here on assumptions.

And favoring who? the very ones who are beheading people, who have massacred a dozen children in a shelter, who have givven ultimatum to people if they don't evacuate their villages, and delivered on ultimatum and slaughtered people..etc.

Now, this is for sure someone else.

I don't care for either assad or isil.. But, to be certain like this blindly?

Who's got his head up his ass here? That's laughable coming from you.

Or... maybe it shouldn't be :rolleyes:
 
It is indeed ironic. The same crowd who insists on evidence, suddenly is certain here on assumptions.

And favoring who? the very ones who are beheading people, who have massacred a dozen children in a shelter, who have givven ultimatum to people if they don't evacuate their villages, and delivered on ultimatum and slaughtered people..etc.

Now, this is for sure someone else.

I don't care for either assad or isil.. But, to be certain like this blindly?

Who's got his head up his ass here? That's laughable coming from you.

Or... maybe it shouldn't be :rolleyes:

The rebels fighting Assad are not all ISIS or Al Qaeda, fuck twat! You been inhaling too much Putin farts.
 
Russia says that a conventional strike hit a rebel base that was storing and/or manufacturing chemical weapons.

Some US, British, and French officials looked at the situation, then Rex Tillerson (former CEO of Exxon) said there is no doubt in our minds that Assad is responsible.

Which, if it was the rebels' chemicals, Assad is responsible for that, right?
Like saying, "Get your shit under control, Assad."
 
Back
Top