‘What did he know and when did he know it’

[BoyNextDoor]

This is bigger than just Flynn.

Did he get sworn in after the DOJ formally notified the WH counsel that he was a blackmail risk? And they let him be sworn in anyway?


The biggie: Did he act at the direction of the President?

=================
2/26/2017: Now even Representative Jason Chaffetz, Republican of Utah and chairman of the House oversight committee, is saying loud and clear that Flynn was engaged in criminal activity.

“As a former military officer, you simply cannot take money from Russia, Turkey or anybody else,” Mr. Chaffetz said. “And it appears as if he did take that money. It was inappropriate, and there are repercussions for a violation of law.”

NYT


=======================
12/1/2017: "The (Presidential Transition Team) official and Flynn discussed that the members of the Presidential Transition Team at Mar-a-Lago did not want Russia to escalate the situation," the documents state. "Immediately after his phone call with the (Presidential Transition Team) official, Flynn called the Russian ambassador and requested that Russia not escalate the situation and only respond to the U.S. sanctions in a reciprocal manner."

So there you have a senior transition official, with the communication coming out of Mar-a-Lago, directing Flynn's actions. Did he act at the direction of the President?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Oh good lord...


So freaking predictable.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Oh good lord...


So freaking predictable.

You do not think that the National Security Advisor to the President being revealed to the WH counsel as a blackmail risk prior to his swearing in is a big deal? He sat in on every national security briefing up until yesterday and was known to be potentially compromisable?

Big deal to me and I hope everyone else in the US of A. This is something that should rise to the level of everying wanting some answers.

Much bigger deal than other security concerns that have been raised in this country lately.

 

[zipman]

You do not think that the National Security Advisor to the President being revealed to the WH counsel as a blackmail risk prior to his swearing in is a big deal? He sat in on every national security briefing up until yesterday and was known to be potentially compromisable?

Big deal to me and I hope everyone else in the US of A. This is something that should rise to the level of everying wanting some answers.

Much bigger deal than other security concerns that have been raised in this country lately.

No, they screamed for 8 Benghazi investigations but this one they don't think Is valid.

Congress has a clear obligation to investigate this mess immediately.

 

[Rightguide]

Oh good lord...


So freaking predictable.

Triggered Snowflakes pissing down their legs outside of the containment berms around their safe spaces pollutes society and aggravates normal Americans.

 

[Rightguide]

You do not think that the National Security Advisor to the President being revealed to the WH counsel as a blackmail risk prior to his swearing in is a big deal?

He needed to go, not because of a threat to national security but because he himself lied and tried to cover-up a conversation that probably didn't add up to much. If only people were just as vociferous when Obama's National Security Director lied repeatedly to the American people about Benghazi and kept her job, but the right thing was done in this case.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

buh-buh-buh BENGAZI! That is how you respond?

This is not a game this is for real.

What is predictable is FOX's leads are what color panties to buy your GF for Valentine's Day and some arcane proposal to forgive student loans when a handicapped person dies with student loan debt, at the discretion of the Sec of Education (of course they also have a bill to abolish the position of Sec of Ed)

Stupid is as stupid does.

 

[OldJourno]

I missed the whole blackmail angle.
How was Flynn at risk of being blackmailed?

 

[KingOrfeo]

Triggered Snowflakes pissing down their legs outside of the containment berms around their safe spaces pollutes society and aggravates normal Americans.

Not much.

 

[KingOrfeo]

I missed the whole blackmail angle.
How was Flynn at risk of being blackmailed?

Putin knew all about what he had done.

 

[sr71plt]

I missed the whole blackmail angle.
How was Flynn at risk of being blackmailed?

What you seem to lack is any form of common sense.

 

[OldJourno]

Putin knew all about what he had done.

And that was ... ?

 

[OldJourno]

What you seem to lack is any form of common sense.

Aren't you just too clever for words.
But back to the question, and if you can answer it please do: How was Flynn at risk of being blackmailed.
Simple question.
I do not know the answer.
Do you?

 

[Rightguide]

Putin knew all about what he had done.

But he wasn't a worry at all during the two years he worked for Obama, right?

 

[KingOrfeo]

But he wasn't a worry at all during the two years he worked for Obama, right?

Since Obama ultimately fired him, apparently he was.

 

[sr71plt]

Aren't you just too clever for words.
But back to the question, and if you can answer it please do: How was Flynn at risk of being blackmailed.
Simple question.
I do not know the answer.
Do you?

There are two routes to take (I was involved in doing this for two decades). You usually start with the soft route--giving the mark what he wants in exchange for getting what you want. This is often done with sex (combining the two oldest professions--prostitution and spying), but it can be done with wining and dining or money or even just upping the guy's status in some why that impresses him and plays his ego (guess how easy this is with someone like Flynn or Trump). This had already started with Flynn--probably with much more than we know, but we do know he was paid to attend the launching of Russia's new propaganda media vehicle and wined and dined. He went and he was paid (we don't know how much). We don't know what other bennies he was given, but this is Russia and they take the classic approach to this. As long as this is working--as in the Russians getting what they want from this guy--it may stay at this level. And, this, my naive friend, comes under "blackmail" in intell operations. And they already were here with Flynn (and are with Trump too--it's really easy with Trump; simple ego stroking gets you there).

Then, the other route: using having given what he wants to the guy--which moves into the realm of what he doesn't want others to know he wanted (e.g., hookers who do golden showers with him in a hotel room), if he gives you less of what you want from him, or balks at giving you more of what he didn't know you'd demand from him, or shows cold feet about the whole thing, you move into the "or else" phase. The number of people who won't play rather than being exposed to the world--especially full of themselves people like Trump and Flynn--can be counted on the fingers of your elbow.

This doesn't stop at Flynn in the Trump gang--and it started with Trump a long time ago. It's part of why we don't see his taxes; it's in the Russians' quite blatant activity to undermine Clinton's campaign, but not Trump's; it's in the British intell op's dossier that's slowly becoming public--and it's in some of the people Trump has gathered around him. And that it's working with Trump can be seen in the outrageous statements we've all heard him make (starting with the invitation to the Russians to hack Clinton's e-mails even further. They didn't need such an invitation, but it certainly assured them he was in their bed.)

Methinks you just don't know what the scope of blackmail is. In this case it isn't anything Flynn might be open to--it's in what Flynn, Trump, and some others already are embroiled in with the Russians.

 

[sr71plt]

Since Obama ultimately fired him, apparently he was.

Kaziinnnng!

 

[irksomesauce]

There are two routes to take (I was involved in doing this for two decades).

http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif

Dude, this is the GB, not your next gay fantasy ebook: a few people actually read you here, meaning all the crap you spew that has no connection to actual reality is recorded EVERY. SINGLE. DAY.

Keep beating off your dead Hillary horse like that doesn't prove what a total "analytical" loser you naturally are IRL; keeping whining, You'll see, you'll see! as if you'll ever be anything more than just another cocksucking caricature created from the vast space of utopia known as your mind.

 

[sr71plt]

I neither expect you to say you believe anything I post or give a shit that you don't. The question was asked and I responded to it on the basis of having the knowledge to do so (where do you think the ideas come from for my book, jackass?). I know I gave a solid, reality-based answer, so that's good enough for me. It's actually a little thrill to know that flakes like you are so out of it you don't accept reality. Being as we're on a porn discussion board, there's nothing I feel I have to prove and there's no effect that you are going to have on anything anyway. So, a smile and a lifting of the middle finger to you and life goes on.

 

[irksomesauce]

I neither expect you to say you believe anything I post or give a shit that you don't.

And yet you need to spend the rest of your blah, blah, blah...

The question was asked and I responded to it on the basis of having the knowledge to do so (where do you think the ideas come from for my book, jackass?). I know I gave a solid, reality-based answer, so that's good enough for me. It's actually a little thrill to know that flakes like you are so out of it you don't accept reality. Being as we're on a porn discussion board, there's nothing I feel I have to prove and there's no effect that you are going to have on anything anyway. So, a smile and a lifting of the middle finger to you and life goes on.

...proving how much you do "give a shit".

Fuck outta here, poser.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To the thread title question:

‘What did he know and when did he know it’

What is what the loser piece of shit op asks every time he's caught screwing a weak, adulterous woman behind her husband's back, Alex?

 

[phrodeau]

Since nobody in the Trump admin can ever give a straight or honest answer to any question, we will never know.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Since nobody in the Trump admin can ever give a straight or honest answer to any question, we will never know.

Certainly Trump couldn't. He has no idea what he knew or when he knew it.

 

[sr71plt]

...proving how much you do "give a shit".

Certainly can see how much you care. Ties you in knots that your posts are impotent no matter what alt you're using.

Fuck outta here, poser.

Ummm, no. I don't think so. (And it's particularly fun that you squeak that demand, as it gives me an opportunity to demonstrate your impotence here. )

 

[sr71plt]

Certainly Trump couldn't. He has no idea what he knew or when he knew it.

Oh, I think he knows he knew he'd been officially warned about Flynn well before he did anything about it. That's the point to note in the building list of violations.

 

[someoneyouknow]

Trump was told on January 26th the Justice Department had serious questions about Flynn's actions:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/14/politics/donald-trump-administration-michael-flynn/index.html

And Republican Mitch McConnell is saying a Senate investigation into Flynn is highly likely:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/14/politics/republicans-want-flynn-investigations/index.html