Petition to change electoral votes to favor HRC.

[Lord Pmann]

Electing judges has always seemed to me to be just about the worst part of America's byzantine legal system.

And still, no one gives a shit about your opinion on American politics.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

i agree. if challenges are ever made to the electoral college, they should not be retroactive. her win in the popular vote gives decent grounds for challenging the system on a legal basis, if her lawyers choose to do so. at least i would think. still. if changes were made (let me laugh now) they should be for future elections. this election was run under the premise of the electoral college, and it should stand as such until there is no electoral college remaining.

No fucking chance.

She was running to win the electoral college.

She knew the rules. The only reason she went to California was to raise money.

She never even talked to the people of California because the state's electoral votes were firmly in her pocket.

The rules that need to be changed are the rules of the Democrat Party by which they actually deny their members the popular vote. They do not trust you. You are stupid, deplorable and will make the wrong choice, so they chose for you. Get over it. Deal with it. Get on to the stage known as acceptance. Denial is so ugly...

 

[1sickbastard]

I picked 5 because it's half a decade, makes for nice even election cycles, gives them a chance to work and do some shit, build those relationships you're talking about, before the people decide if they want to let them keep their job or not but not so long that they can't get shit canned either.

Fair enough on the staggering. But without term limits I seriously doubt you would need them to prevent a total change over. I don't want term limits, I'm rather anti term limit all around so in my universe that's just not a problem. If people want to keep their reps they should keep them, but also if they don't they should fire the mother fucker. The election cycle is that opportunity to change your representative if the people so choose. Hell the POTUS should be the same way in my opinion too, if we want to keep our President we should be allowed to. If not, elect a new one and the loosers just have to suck it.

But for fun let's say for whatever reason term limits had to be part of the deal because people wanted them. Yea we could work a staggering system into it, just have an election cycle every 2 years, alternating congressional/exec votes, everyone serves 4 year terms, senators and POTUS one cycle, governors and reps the other. Boom. Little more voting but it would still be streamlined, fair as possible and E Z as 123...

Oh and finally switch to the metric system.

God damn we should run this bitch

No term limits, but an elected official needs to be barred from seeking an elected office while currently holding a government job. That would kill the power of incumbency and encourage those in office to do their fucking jobs full time instead of spending most of their time trying to figure out whose cock they need to suck to keep the job.
Also, it forces office holders out into the private sector every other election cycle, so being a career politician is no longer an option.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No term limits, but an elected official needs to be barred from seeking an elected office while currently holding a government job. That would kill the power of incumbency and encourage those in office to do their fucking jobs full time instead of spending most of their time trying to figure out whose cock they need to suck to keep the job.
Also, it forces office holders out into the private sector every other election cycle, so being a career politician is no longer an option.

That statement seems to contradict itself.

The distinction between running and doing things to get reelected would be a highly subjective one.

Bring home the bacon to your district/state? Are you doing good, or are you buying votes?

 

[1sickbastard]

Another suggestion is no more private campaign chests. All donations go into one big pot and anyone who can get a minimum number of signatures gets an equal, fixed lump sum to fund the campaign. Perhaps include a min/max amount of paid media exposure as part of the deal. That means it becomes more about having to go out and really work the prospective electorate and less about which corp is financing which superPACs.

 

[1sickbastard]

That statement seems to contradict itself.

The distinction between running and doing things to get reelected would be a highly subjective one.

Bring home the bacon to your district/state? Are you doing good, or are you buying votes?

Hey, if the Right Honorable Who DaFuc was so good at bringing home the bacon, then it won't take much effort to remind the voters, would it?

 

[Ishmael]

Another suggestion is no more private campaign chests. All donations go into one big pot and anyone who can get a minimum number of signatures gets an equal, fixed lump sum to fund the campaign. Perhaps include a min/max amount of paid media exposure as part of the deal. That means it becomes more about having to go out and really work the prospective electorate and less about which corp is financing which superPACs.

Are you fucking serious? No one is going to get shit sparky.

Ishmael

 

[alea45]

No fucking chance.

She was running to win the electoral college.

She knew the rules. The only reason she went to California was to raise money.

She never even talked to the people of California because the state's electoral votes were firmly in her pocket.

The rules that need to be changed are the rules of the Democrat Party by which they actually deny their members the popular vote. They do not trust you. You are stupid, deplorable and will make the wrong choice, so they chose for you. Get over it. Deal with it. Get on to the stage known as acceptance. Denial is so ugly...

Did you read what she wrote, you vile prairie nigger? Are you being distracted by your pet gook again?

 

[Ishmael]

A petition to determine the next president. How Jr. High can you get?

I wonder how many think that if that petition were to have any effect there wouldn't be violence in it's wake? If you want to start a revolution, you've certainly found the way.

Ishmael

 

[BoyNextDoor]

The EC petition stuff is a silly distraction.

How do 30 governors respond to unprecedented federal support?

What does a court look like with 3 appointees by The Orangutang?

Can the Senate be made a legislative body that will legislate?

Will the Democrats determine that Bernie should be the Minority Leader?

Is the House able to actually put together a Budget?

So many things that are way more interesting.

 

[1sickbastard]

Are you fucking serious? No one is going to get shit sparky.

Ishmael

You mean candidates will have to go door to door without funds, staff, media, in the hopes of convincing enough voters to put them in office?

Is this a problem?

 

[Ishmael]

You mean candidates will have to go door to door without funds, staff, media, in the hopes of convincing enough voters to put them in office?

Is this a problem?

Door to door would be good, impractical, but good.

As opposed to your notion that people should donate to individuals whose notions they are vehemently opposed to.

Further you foolishly presume that given a communal pool of funds that those funds will be equally divided. In that case, hell yes, throw my hat in the ring. Throw everyone's hat in the ring. I can use some spreadin' around money.

You really haven't thought this through, have you?

Ishmael

 

[Hypoxia]

All elected officials now in office hold jobs because of the existing system.

None will vote to end the procedures that put them where they are. Illogical.

Can unelected electors (*) be persuaded or bribed to cast rogue votes? I dunno.
_____

(*) "Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector." Art.II Sect.1. That means they're all amateurs.

 

[hashtag4]

Did you read what she wrote, you vile prairie nigger? Are you being distracted by your pet gook again?

Reported, this comment being tied to RobDownSouth's previous illicit comments in breach of forum rules

 

[Saint Peter]

Reported, this comment being tied to RobDownSouth's previous illicit comments in breach of forum rules

It is only funny to use derogatory descriptions of people when done so by funny posters like busyboob.

I am not defending any of these fuckers. I do not even like to see their hate quoted. Your case is weak sauce when you giggle with the racists and tell us how smart they are and simultaneously cry when your boy is on the receiving end.

 

[hashtag4]

It is only funny to use derogatory descriptions of people when done so by funny posters like busyboob.

I am not defending any of these fuckers. I do not even like to see their hate quoted. Your case is weak sauce when you giggle with the racists and tell us how smart they are and simultaneously cry when your boy is on the receiving end.

Shutup, you hypochrytical racist mofo.
Jews hater and hater of native americans

 

[hashtag4]

And I didn't report that post because of the racist comment, as you are trying to imply.
I reported it because it alluded to 4est's UNDERAGE DAUGHTER, and you bloody know that.

I'm not surprised by your attitude, since I've seen you encourage and defend GoldenBoy's attacks (which are in breach of forum rules) all the time. I guess those are ok in your books, if the target is one of your enemies.

You and your ilk are nothing but a bunch of hypochrytical racist turds.
At least the R-wingers are honest about their racism, and they don't cyberstalk individual posters with illicit stuff either, the way you lot do.

 

[Emerson40]

It is only funny to use derogatory descriptions of people when done so by funny posters like busyboob.

I am not defending any of these fuckers. I do not even like to see their hate quoted. Your case is weak sauce when you giggle with the racists and tell us how smart they are and simultaneously cry when your boy is on the receiving end.

But, he used a frowning emoji to let busybooby and jimmy know he doesn't endorse the bad behaviours that aren't funny. And gumpy would never be so vile, unless attacked first, because he is clearly more edumacated than you and your fellow progressive enablers.

Now fuck off his back and quit endorsing Emerson and RobDownSouth by disagreeing with him.

 

[Saint Peter]

Shutup, you hypochrytical racist mofo.
Jews hater and hater of native americans

I understand. I am sure Laurel will also understand.

Keep reporting the posts calling out your boy. Keep telling the racists how funny they are. Deflect when you are asked about your behavior. Copy and past the same post, post after post, when you have nothing new to say or add.

It has worked so well for all of your other alts. It will work for this one as well.

Speaking of work I am going to go in a little early. Have a nice day posting and eating cheetos. Maybe get a nap in!

 

[hashtag4]

Geeze, all the defenders of illicit attacks in breach of forum rules are aglutinating here.
Give it a rest and keep focusing on your favourite topic (buttholes and anal sex) instead, TrailerTrashrash40

 

[hashtag4]

I understand. I am sure Laurel will also understand.

Keep reporting the posts calling out your boy. Keep telling the racists how funny they are. Deflect when you are asked about your behavior. Copy and past the same post, post after post, when you have nothing new to say or add.

It has worked so well for all of you other alts. It will work for this one as well.

Speaking of work I am going to go in a little early. Have a nice day posting and eating cheetos. Maybe get a nap in!

Bottomline, for you it's all about AJ. It's been about AJ all along, in every single one of our interactions.

You're either one disgrunted grudge-holding mofo, the way you keep bringing me into whatever's been going on between the two of you (even if I keep telling you that I want no part in your guys' vendetta),
-- or you're insanely attracted to AJ.

Because the intensity of it all is too over the top.

 

[Emerson40]

Geeze, all the defenders and fans of underage slurs and stuff are aglutinating here.
Give it a rest and keep focusing on your favourite topic (buttholes and anal sex) instead, TrailerTrashrash40

Reported.

Some knobs just never learn.

 

[Saint Peter]

Who were the comments of the reported post directed at?

 

[Saint Peter]

Reported.

Some knobs just never learn.

Never learn. It got banned for playing this game with me months ago even after I warned it.

A dog back to its vomit.

 

[hashtag4]

EDITED AGAIN

So to summarize:
All this because I reported one of the numerous references (which violate forum rules) made by one of RobDownSouth's alts?

You two are such class acts