Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

Status
Not open for further replies.
I got polled the other day and the questions were obviously designed to get a response favorable to one side over the other. It was ridiculous.

A click-bait ad asking "Would you vote for a criminal for President?" is not a real poll.
 
A click-bait ad asking "Would you vote for a criminal for President?" is not a real poll.

This was a supposedly legit poll done by phone, and the questions were not that poorly designed. It was very, very thorough. Took about fifteen minutes.
 
This was a supposedly legit poll done by phone, and the questions were not that poorly designed. It was very, very thorough. Took about fifteen minutes.

Did their setup questions change your mind on who you'd vote for?
 
Did their setup questions change your mind on who you'd vote for?

No. But I can see where they would have a significant influence on how a lot of people would answer the later questions, the bottom line questions.
 
Much like two dipshits here, the Drumpfs can't speak without regurgitating other's words.

Donald Trump’s Big Gun Idea? Literally Stolen From Tim Kaine.

Y'all need to take a hint from miles.

Too friggin' funny.

there's a paragraph in there that almost directly mirrors what botany boy just said in the previous thread about how if we actually did go into the areas that are having a problem with guns and prosecuted people who are prohibited from having guns for carrying in order to get them off the street it would be considered racist. That's exactly what they are saying.

in Frodo's world if we have smart guns and prosecuted everyone who was carrying a dumb gun it would disproportionally affect blacks because they would be using the non smart guns because more of them wouldn't be approved to get a smart gun. Because they're felons.

And just by sheer racist coincidence more of them use guns to kill each other then the rest of the population. Turns out locking up 400 felons walking around with guns lowers the murder rate. Who would have thought it?
 
there's a paragraph in there that almost directly mirrors what botany boy just said in the previous thread about how if we actually did go into the areas that are having a problem with guns and prosecuted people who are prohibited from having guns for carrying in order to get them off the street it would be considered racist. That's exactly what they are saying.

NRA safety courses?
 
Too friggin' funny.

there's a paragraph in there that almost directly mirrors what botany boy just said in the previous thread about how if we actually did go into the areas that are having a problem with guns and prosecuted people who are prohibited from having guns for carrying in order to get them off the street it would be considered racist. That's exactly what they are saying.

in Frodo's world if we have smart guns and prosecuted everyone who was carrying a dumb gun it would disproportionally affect blacks because they would be using the non smart guns because more of them wouldn't be approved to get a smart gun. Because they're felons.

And just by sheer racist coincidence more of them use guns to kill each other then the rest of the population. Turns out locking up 400 felons walking around with guns lowers the murder rate. Who would have thought it?

Given that the War on Drugs is ongoing and we can look at sentencing differences for race it's pretty clear nobody in power gives a shit if it's racist or not.
 
Given that the War on Drugs is ongoing and we can look at sentencing differences for race it's pretty clear nobody in power gives a shit if it's racist or not.

I wonder if it ever occurred to the "victims of racial sentencing" that if they just didn't do the crime they wouldn't have to serve the time? You'll find my sympathy in the dictionary, somewhere between SHIT and SYPHILIS.

Ishmael
 
Given that the War on Drugs is ongoing and we can look at sentencing differences for race it's pretty clear nobody in power gives a shit if it's racist or not.

Agreed. I can see Busybody and JBJ getting behind a Kaine/Clinton ticket if they'll flip the ticket.

Interviewer: JBJ, what do you call Kaine's Exille program that took 400 mostly black felons off the street to do 5 years of Federal time for minor weapons violations?

JBJ: A good start. . .

Interviewer: Anything to add Busy?

BB: Clinton's comments about the black community raising up "Super Predators" shows that even a blind cunt gets a nut now and again.

__________________________________________________

If this ticket will quit pretending that rednecks with pistol grips and bipod mounts are the reason for misnamed "gun violence" they might get the NRA seal of approval!
 
I wonder if it ever occurred to the "victims of racial sentencing" that if they just didn't do the crime they wouldn't have to serve the time? You'll find my sympathy in the dictionary, somewhere between SHIT and SYPHILIS.

Ishmael

Ultimately that is irrelevant. The punishment for a given crime should be the same regardless of your sex or race. Your effectively stating "yeah, you will get it worse than me if we do the same thing. Remember you're not me." And you're not wrong, and I don't expect you to have sympathy. I expect people who claim to think justice is an ideal however to fix it.
 
Ultimately that is irrelevant. The punishment for a given crime should be the same regardless of your sex or race. Your effectively stating "yeah, you will get it worse than me if we do the same thing. Remember you're not me." And you're not wrong, and I don't expect you to have sympathy. I expect people who claim to think justice is an ideal however to fix it.

You're looking for a fix outside the black community. That frankly is not possible. The problem has to be fixed from within or not at all.

Concentrated policing of the black community is a symptom not the problem. I will definitely grant you that it is exacerbated the problem and that increased incarceration rates have led to obviously increased single-parent households which again perpetuates the cycle and makes it worse but that was never the genesis of the problem.

Take for example the crack epidemic. Wasn't that crack did not find its way into white neighborhoods because of course it did then and now. But you did not see the debilitating effects on those communities that you saw in the black community. Greater wealth and prosperity made the addcts a little less noticeable to their neighbors. You didn't see crack houses springing up in white neighborhoods you didn't see Turf War battles being fought in white neighborhoods those examples of blight or what was being addressed by the police departments at the behest of people in the black community that initially complain that the police were looking the other way rather than doing something about those problems.
 
You gotta love the way right wingers make grand arguable/dubious assertions as facts. Always somehow leading to the conclusion that it's them not us.
 
You gotta love the way right wingers make grand arguable/dubious assertions as facts. Always somehow leading to the conclusion that it's them not us.

No, it's definately you, not us.

Don't you love it how foreign pukes who get their propaganda spoon-fed to them a hemisphere away know exactly what life in America is like? As if life in America is anyway homogenious in a country with 340 million people spread over a huge land mass, with wildly varying resources and population densities.

Somewhere in America someone lives exactly as you do. Nowhere in your Podunk little country can the wildly varied American Experience be found.
 
No, it's definately you, not us.

Don't you love it how foreign pukes who get their propaganda spoon-fed to them a hemisphere away know exactly what life in America is like? As if life in America is anyway homogenious in a country with 340 million people spread over a huge land mass, with wildly varying resources and population densities.

Somewhere in America someone lives exactly as you do. Nowhere in your Podunk little country can the wildly varied American Experience be found.

Racism, ad hominem and a big strawman. And more wild assertions expressed as facts.

You've got it all.

Have a reactionary day!!!
 
Racism, ad hominem and a big strawman. And more wild assertions expressed as facts.

You've got it all.

Have a reactionary day!!!

Still having trouble with the concept of race? What "race" are New Zealanders? <rhetorical>
 
Still having trouble with the concept of race? What "race" are New Zealanders? <rhetorical>

The word "racism" isn't yours to define.

I'm not a New Zealander although why that's important to you is your problem.
 
Apropos of nothing in particular-

Don't you love it when a person has learned some of the terms for logical fallacies used in rhetorical argument, and think that simply pasting labels down on the table rather than defeating said fallacies by logical, reasoned, rhetorical debate carries the day for them?

#winningbyselfdeclarationofdefault
 
Apropos of nothing in particular-

Don't you love it when a person has learned some of the terms for logical fallacies used in rhetorical argument, and think that simply pasting labels down on the table rather than defeating said fallacies by logical, reasoned, rhetorical debate carries the day for them?

#winningbyselfdeclarationofdefault

Strawman.

As if life in America is anyway homogenious (sic) in a country with 340 million people spread over a huge land mass, with wildly varying resources and population densities.

Absolutely nothing to do with anything I said but you blurted it out anyway.

LOLz.
 
The word "racism" isn't yours to define.

I'm not a New Zealander although why that's important to you is your problem.
Go ahead and point out that foundation for that straw man you just set up. Where did I ever say you were from New Zealand?

Pointing out that -pick a country and it's inhabitants- is not a race does not localize your domicile.

Racism is an actual word, with both connotations and denotations all rooted in race. Choosing to missaprpriate a word because it is a popular ad hominem changes the actual definition of the word in no one's mind but your own.

I could accuse you for vegetarianism for eating meat but it wouldn't be correct word usage.

Words have actual meaning or there's no point to having meaning associated with words.
 
Last edited:
Strawman.



Absolutely nothing to do with anything I said but you blurted it out anyway.

LOLz.

Oh, gee. A label. Show it ti the debate judges and have them declare you the winner in a debate you never participated in.
 
Go ahead and point out that foundation for that straw man you just set up. Where did I ever say you were from New Zealand?

Pointing out that -pick a country and it's inhabitants- is not a race does not localize your domicile.

Racism is an actual word, with both connotations and denotations all rooted in race. Choosing to missaprpriate a word because it is a popular ad hominem changes the actual definition of the word in no one's mind but your own.

I could accuse you for vegetarianism for eating meat but it wouldn't be correct word usage.

Words have actual meaning or there's no point to having meaning associated with words.

Oh good lord. It's like arguing with a 10 year old.

And you don't get to define the meanings of words, Humpty Dumpty.
 
The word "racism" isn't yours to define.

I'm not a New Zealander although why that's important to you is your problem.

Oh good lord.

It has a proper dictionary definition which Liberals simply ignore. It has come to mean anything from prejudice and bigotry to I disagree with what you're saying so that makes you a racist.

You seem to fall consistently into the latter category.
 
Oh good lord. I am arguing from the point of view of a 10 year old.

And <sic> you don't get to use the clearly defined meanings of words; only I, Humpty Dumpty, get to decide what they mean.

I think you summed that up well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top