Punish Women For Having Abortions?

[JackLuis]

This message is hidden because Real_American11 is on your ignore list.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Right here I won't read a wall of text.

Everything you say is a lie. You are a dangerous person, you wish to murder the world. You are scum.

I don't see you quoted in that post do you?

I admit that I did have it there as a reference but I edited three hours before you responded so. . . .yeah.

And that is not a wall of text at all. You simply have nothing to offer.

 

[phrodeau]

Right here I won't read a wall of text.

Everything you say is a lie. You are a dangerous person, you wish to murder the world. You are scum.

Have you gotten through the Constitution yet?

 

[Hypoxia]

The real question is: Should ANYONE be punished for violating the law. Answer YES!

Certainly Hillary should be.

As SecState, Ms Clinton had executive authority to classify documents. If she said they were secret, they were. If she said they weren't, they weren't.

It's hard to violate the law when you ARE the law, eh?

Back to punishing sluts. Please point to laws defining and prohibiting sluttiness. Please tell us why the private sexual behavior of adults is any of your concern. Please tell us why you obsess over other people's sex lives. Not getting any yourself?

 

[Hard_Rom]

Ever notice how those who spout off about individual rights, big government and libertarian ideals get all fascist as soon as their own ideal of morals and ethics are crossed.

Let he is without sin cast the first stone.

 

[dan_c00000]

Have you gotten through the Constitution yet?

I'm gunna guess no.

 

[Real_American11]

This message is hidden because Real_American11 is on your ignore list.

Hey troll, elcome to ignore.

I don't see you quoted in that post do you?

Yes you quoted me.

Have you gotten through the Constitution yet?

I understand it better than scum like you.

If she said they were secret, they were.

And she did, then she stored them on a private server... felony.

Not to mention her responsibility for the consulate being attacked and deaths of four Americans.

Ever notice how those who spout off about individual rights, big government and libertarian ideals get all fascist as soon as their own ideal of morals and ethics are crossed.

You're a fucking retard.

Nothing I said violates libertarian views. Everything I've called for is in response to aggression from big government and dangerous groups like socialists and Muslims.

It is an act of self-defense, it it an act of national defense.

I'm gunna guess no.

Hey cunt, you're a progressive twat and the enemy of liberty.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Where is the quote of you? Highlight it if you please.

 

[Real_American11]

Where is the quote of you? Highlight it if you please.

You're a sneaky little scum fuck, you edited your post,

You block quoted my post, and then edited it later. You're bullshit won't cut it with me you filthy nigger.

 

[BotanyBoy]

You're a sneaky little scum fuck, you edited your post,

You block quoted my post, and then edited it later. You're bullshit won't cut it with me you filthy nigger.

I see it's having trouble with reality again....

 

[phrodeau]

You're a sneaky little scum fuck, you edited your post,

You block quoted my post, and then edited it later. You're bullshit won't cut it with me you filthy nigger.

Real Americans use English. Take your foreign words elsewhere.

 

[Sean Renaud]

You're a sneaky little scum fuck, you edited your post,

You block quoted my post, and then edited it later. You're bullshit won't cut it with me you filthy nigger.

Yes I did edit my post because I accidently left the last line or two of your text in. I did quote it as a reference while I wrote. However Lit leaves these nifty things called timestamps. The post in question was editted at 5:30 pm 4/5/16. It's at the bottom of the post in italics. You claimed I should learn to quote correctly and refused to read walls of text three full hours later at 8:30 4/5/16 In this case the time stamp is in the upper left hand corner. Then a full twenty four hours passed and you link to the post "in question" which is when any even someone who goofed should have noticed I editted.

So lets see, it's not a wall of text. It's not that long and there are regular breaks in it. A wall of text is generally about poor formatting or an insane amount of text. That post is neither. I guess if you had to sound out every word it could have taken you three hours to read it but. . .damn. We accuse of you being slow but that takes some work.

 

[Real_American11]

Real Americans use English. Take your foreign words elsewhere.

English is made of foreign words you moron... it is a West Germanic language that was heavily influenced by Latin and French, and to a lesser degree by Greek as well as a few other languages like Spanish and Italian... ignoring the influence of other languages in the last few centuries do to more travel and communications.

As much as I'd like it, we don't speak Anglish, we speak English. American English, not that gay shit in the UK, Aus, and Can, etc...

...

You lying nigger, my reply was three hours after your edit.

I opened a reply page in a new window and didn't hit submit until after you edited your message.

In your original message you quoted a previous post with about 8 lines of text, and then had your own 8 or so lines in response, your lies don't cut it here faggot.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Yes I did edit my post because I accidently left the last line or two of your text in. I did quote it as a reference while I wrote. However Lit leaves these nifty things called timestamps. The post in question was editted at 5:30 pm 4/5/16. It's at the bottom of the post in italics. You claimed I should learn to quote correctly and refused to read walls of text three full hours later at 8:30 4/5/16 In this case the time stamp is in the upper left hand corner. Then a full twenty four hours passed and you link to the post "in question" which is when any even someone who goofed should have noticed I editted.

So lets see, it's not a wall of text. It's not that long and there are regular breaks in it. A wall of text is generally about poor formatting or an insane amount of text. That post is neither. I guess if you had to sound out every word it could have taken you three hours to read it but. . .damn. We accuse of you being slow but that takes some work.

I just bolded it. 3 hours later is your complaint.

English is made of foreign words you moron... it is a West Germanic language that was heavily influenced by Latin and French, and to a lesser degree by Greek as well as a few other languages like Spanish and Italian... ignoring the influence of other languages in the last few centuries do to more travel and communications.

As much as I'd like it, we don't speak Anglish, we speak English. American English, not that gay shit in the UK, Aus, and Can, etc...

You lying nigger, my reply was three hours after your edit.

I opened a reply page in a new window and didn't hit submit until after you edited your message.

In your original message you quoted a previous post with about 8 lines of text, and then had your own 8 or so lines in response, your lies don't cut it here faggot.

You take THREE hours to reply? Like I said, I know we accuse of being a little slow but goddamn. Maybe just for you I should record messages so you don't have to strain yourself trying to read.

 

[Real_American11]

You take THREE hours to reply?

I am in several tabs, other threads, other forums, watching videos, etc. Point is you are a lying faggot.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Yeah, maybe you don't go quite that deep next time. And you still had more than 24 hours before your next post so even if you goofed once you actually QUOTED me and should have seen I had already deleted it. It's nobody's fault but your own that you're half retard.

Nobody lied either. The important detail here is that is no wall of text. You're shifting from addressing the claim to insultes because you have nothing left.

 

[Real_American11]

...

You are a liar, nobody's falling for it.

You edited it in the three hour window between me clicking "quote" and "submit".

 

[Hard_Rom]

Yeah, maybe you don't go quite that deep next time. And you still had more than 24 hours before your next post so even if you goofed once you actually QUOTED me and should have seen I had already deleted it. It's nobody's fault but your own that you're half retard.

Nobody lied either. The important detail here is that is no wall of text. You're shifting from addressing the claim to insultes because you have nothing left.

Are you actually trying to reason with it? Glutton for punishment? Thick skin! You must have a thick forehead from banging it against a brick wall repeatedly.

 

[Sean Renaud]

You are a liar, nobody's falling for it.

You edited it in the three hour window between me clicking "quote" and "submit".

No I didn't. The time stamp shows WHEN I editted. In order for you argument to stand you had to have opened a window to respond and left it there for a minimum of three full hours. THREE. I posted it at 4:08, then an hour and a half passed and then I saw my goof and fixed it. You had to have clicked respond, not quote (because an edit does NOT retroactively change a quote, in fact that's why we do it sometimes to keep people honest.) Which means you had to have clicked on it at almost exactly 5:30 and you didn't quote.

Sorry.

Are you actually trying to reason with it? Glutton for punishment? Thick skin! You must have a thick forehead from banging it against a brick wall repeatedly.

Too much time on my hands sometimes. Also considering I only Facebook 4 times a year or so on average I'm kinda the same person all the time and I'm getting to the point where someone is going to stab me at a family reunion and be all "Remember when you said Trump Supporters were all stupid ugly vultures?!" I don't like sharp metal bits in my soft fleshy bits.

 

[Real_American11]

...

Yes, I waited three hour you dirty nigger, so you're lies won't work here.

And when I quoted you and saw you're wall of text, I replaced it with "...", so you're lie =s have been shot down again.

 

[Tigersman]

Degenerate filth, hello filth can you hear me?

What does a woman killing a child have to do with a man cutting his tubes?

Because the majority of laws on each state's book limiting access to abortion are passed by the male majority of each state's legislature and people like you believe pregnancy is a safe thing considering today's medicine and access to our hospitals. WRONG! Pregnant is no safer today as it was a hundred or more years ago except we have more hospitals and more doctors.

If a woman that does not want her baby but people like you want to force her to have it, are you personally going to adopt the child and raise? Not likely.

 

[Tigersman]

I'm having trouble finding in the constitution where they mention abortion or fetuses in the womb.

Our Constitution and all of our amendments to the Constitution do not mention women anywhere in it. It does mention people but if you study the history of that time, you find our that women were considered nothing more that chattel.

Our nation was founded by men, for men and against women.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Our Constitution and all of our amendments to the Constitution do not mention women anywhere in it. It does mention people but if you study the history of that time, you find our that women were considered nothing more that chattel.

Our nation was founded by men, for men and against women.

If that were true then women would still be nothing more than chattel.

 

[LadyVer]

It's always extremely interesting to see men discussing women's reproductive health. If men were so passionate about their reproductive health and discussed it on Lit.

 

[BotanyBoy]

It's always extremely interesting to see men discussing women's reproductive health. If men were so passionate about their reproductive health and discussed it on Lit.

If men were so passionate about their reproductive health and discussed it on lit what?

Plan on finishing that thought?