SusanJillParker
I'm 100% woman
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2011
- Posts
- 2,155
Speaking of guns...
If our judges, police, and politicians weren't owned by the NRA and if Congress had the backbone to sign a law, one that seemingly opposed the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution, and a law with teeth that was in direct opposition of the beloved (sic) NRA, what would you do? Before we state the proposed new law, let's recap the 2nd Amendment.
"Every moronic American can bear arms and shoot anyone they want at any time, even themselves (we can only hope), because it's not the gun that's responsible for shooting anyone, it's the shooter. Am I right or have I paraphrased it in such a way that even you, a gun owner, can understand.
"How's that for spin?"
Written by a top ad agency, a Philadelphia lawyer couldn't write a better nonsensical excuse why someone so innocent as a school full of children were needlessly shot to death and murdered.
Right? Is that the above the gist of the outdated second amendment that was adopted at a time when we had Indians, rustlers, and murderers and didn't have city police, state police, federal police, SWAT, FBI, NSA, CIA, and an armed to the teeth military?
Before we begin, lemme ask you a question first. Why is it called the NRA, National Rifle Association? Begging a better name, why not call it the NRA the NHGA, National Hand Gun Association or NMA, the National Murder Association?
I like the last name the best, the NMA, the National Murder Association. It sounds like a legalized murder for hire association, hit men without having to pay dues to the Mafia and without having to wear dreadful Hawaiian shirts over their fat, Italian bodies.
I don't know the 2nd amendment verbatim but I think what I wrote above is what the law reads based upon that's what happens in this country every day and in every city. Anyway...not to digress but...if Congress passed a law that you fools could own only one gun, what would that gun be?
Seriously. I'm curious. You're the gun owners and the loyal members of the NMA, sorry, the NRA. You're the experts. If anyone, you know guns the best. This is your time to shine. This is your time to educate the rest of us, the head in the clouds when our heads aren't up our asses, peace loving pacifists.
If you could only own one gun, just one, what would that gun be? Would it be a rifle? What kind of rifle and why? A handgun? What kind of handgun and why? A shotgun? What kind of shotgun and why? Or would you go for broke and buy that AK47, the most sold and deadliest automatic weapon in the world for the last several decades?
If our judges, police, and politicians weren't owned by the NRA and if Congress had the backbone to sign a law, one that seemingly opposed the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution, and a law with teeth that was in direct opposition of the beloved (sic) NRA, what would you do? Before we state the proposed new law, let's recap the 2nd Amendment.
"Every moronic American can bear arms and shoot anyone they want at any time, even themselves (we can only hope), because it's not the gun that's responsible for shooting anyone, it's the shooter. Am I right or have I paraphrased it in such a way that even you, a gun owner, can understand.
"How's that for spin?"
Written by a top ad agency, a Philadelphia lawyer couldn't write a better nonsensical excuse why someone so innocent as a school full of children were needlessly shot to death and murdered.
Right? Is that the above the gist of the outdated second amendment that was adopted at a time when we had Indians, rustlers, and murderers and didn't have city police, state police, federal police, SWAT, FBI, NSA, CIA, and an armed to the teeth military?
Before we begin, lemme ask you a question first. Why is it called the NRA, National Rifle Association? Begging a better name, why not call it the NRA the NHGA, National Hand Gun Association or NMA, the National Murder Association?
I like the last name the best, the NMA, the National Murder Association. It sounds like a legalized murder for hire association, hit men without having to pay dues to the Mafia and without having to wear dreadful Hawaiian shirts over their fat, Italian bodies.
I don't know the 2nd amendment verbatim but I think what I wrote above is what the law reads based upon that's what happens in this country every day and in every city. Anyway...not to digress but...if Congress passed a law that you fools could own only one gun, what would that gun be?
Seriously. I'm curious. You're the gun owners and the loyal members of the NMA, sorry, the NRA. You're the experts. If anyone, you know guns the best. This is your time to shine. This is your time to educate the rest of us, the head in the clouds when our heads aren't up our asses, peace loving pacifists.
If you could only own one gun, just one, what would that gun be? Would it be a rifle? What kind of rifle and why? A handgun? What kind of handgun and why? A shotgun? What kind of shotgun and why? Or would you go for broke and buy that AK47, the most sold and deadliest automatic weapon in the world for the last several decades?