2014 Negro Hunting Season in Missouri

I'm frankly surprised at how this is going. Things are looking way better for the cop than it originally appeared they would. I still don't get why a lot of this information helpful to the cop, and damaging to Brown, wasn't released to the public earlier. Makes no sense to me.

It takes time to invent this shit and coerce witnesses into verifying it.

Anybody who doubts that the police are merely another criminal gang hasn't had any real contact with them. You want to find out how it really is? It's easy, if you have the balls to do it.

Just get some really dark makeup and a black wig, borrow an expensive car, and cruise through a fancy neighborhood after dark. Put a baggy of oregano on the seat next to you. Or better yet, a fat stack of $100 bills.

You're going to be face down in the street before you know what happened. And your money will be gone.

Most of this shit you never hear about, because the victims are helpless, or if they're not, it's settled quietly out of court with no admission of guilt. I have personal knowledge of at least a dozen such cases, a couple of them involving me personally.

Keep on hiring more cops and let them play soldier; you pay the bills and see how long it takes them to get around to victimizing you. Your turn will come.
 
That's interesting. From my side of the fence, it seems that a certain subset of political poster...the far right wing fringe whackadoodle (specifically, Ish, AJ, Miles, the Vetteman and you) have engaged in non-stop "victim blaming" from day one. And the whole lot of you are shocked...SHOCKED...that anyone is taking issue with your actions.

I been dancing in the street that the pot head is in hell with Trayvon, and I pray to Jesus that Michaels homey, Johnson, is indicted for murder. I'll hafta do a victory lap if he is.
 
I been dancing in the street that the pot head is in hell with Trayvon, and I pray to Jesus that Michaels homey, Johnson, is indicted for murder. I'll hafta do a victory lap if he is.

That would be the protocol if the shoot is determined to be righteous.

Ishmael
 
That would be the protocol if the shoot is determined to be righteous.

Ishmael

In this state an accomplice is charged with the murder if the officer is cleared of the shooting. I suspect the real issue for Obama and Holder is how to save Johnson. Johnson may be an accessory after the fact as he lied to the police and tried to conceal Brown's assault on a leo. Maybe Wilson cleared Johnson, the report will say. But Wilson didn't die and Johnson wasn't arrested, so the perjury may be addressed later.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Still waiting..
You're not paying attention....

... he did set the chain of events in motion by his criminal behavior.

Absolutely correct. The kid was a criminal, there is no doubt. Not saying he deserved to die for his criminal acts, but he certainly was no innocent kid.

What's the over-under on the blood test substances from our innocent "Ute?"

Cigars to smoke pot openly?

When the story first broke, he was an innocent Ute minding his own business gunned down in cold blood for no reason.

Then, when it was discovered that he was a thief, then the story became, nobody deserves to be murdered in cold blood for stealing.

... it only proves how determined the Ute was to engage in suicide by cop.

the evidence is beginning to pile up against the deceased. Apparently the officer had some sort of eye damage. And about a dozen witnesses have corroborated his story of the deceased rushing towards him.

I don't believe anybody is actually blaming the victim, at least not yet. Some of us, who think before accusing, are waiting until all the facts are known before blaming anybody. While waiting, we do cite some of the known facts, such as the theft of cigars.
 
This pretty much sums up one of the main challenges in the USA in terms of battling systemic racism.

'In too many communities, too many young men of colour are left behind and seen only as objects of fear.'

- U.S. President Barack Obama

Trot out all the "bad things" about the kid and all the "nice things" about the cop you like...

The fact remains that cop emptied his gun into an unarmed black kid.

And that shouldn't be happening in the third world...let alone in the USA.
 
A belligerent, charging screaming man the size of an NFL player...

;)

One that already busted up your face and left you with blurred vision and pain.

Let's not leave out all of the facts as they accumulate.

Or, you just wanna stick with the original lie?
 
It takes time to invent this shit and coerce witnesses into verifying it.

Keep on hiring more cops and let them play soldier; you pay the bills and see how long it takes them to get around to victimizing you. Your turn will come.

Is this really what you believe? All these witnesses have been coerced? This is one giant conspiracy? Maybe you can just open your eyes to the building facts. A 300 LB young person, after just robbing a store and roughing up the store owner, had an altercation with a law enforcement officer where he severely damaged his eye. Then, while apparently leaving the altercation, according to witnesses he turned around and was rushing towards the officer. And this corroborated by the entry points of the wounds.

So in that moment, the cop dreamed up this scheme where he'd round up the witnesses, some who are likely the same color as the dead person, and coerced them into this conspiracy?

Holy shit.... amazing what some of you people will believe.
 
Its a socialist science fact that Democrats cant think without several gourds of corn aboard.
 
I believe a cop put at least 6 bullets, including a head shot, into an unarmed teen in broad daylight in the middle of the street.



Is this really what you believe? All these witnesses have been coerced? This is one giant conspiracy? Maybe you can just open your eyes to the building facts. A 300 LB young person, after just robbing a store and roughing up the store owner, had an altercation with a law enforcement officer where he severely damaged his eye. Then, while apparently leaving the altercation, according to witnesses he turned around and was rushing towards the officer. And this corroborated by the entry points of the wounds.

So in that moment, the cop dreamed up this scheme where he'd round up the witnesses, some who are likely the same color as the dead person, and coerced them into this conspiracy?

Holy shit.... amazing what some of you people will believe.
 
The facts are chilling. Systemic racism is "genocide lite".


Exactly How Often Do Police Shoot Unarmed Black Men?
The killing in Ferguson was one of many such cases. Here's what the data reveals.
Mother Earth News

on average there were 96 cases of a white police officer killing a black person each year between 2006 and 2012, based on justifiable homicides reported to the FBI by local police.

The FBI's justifiable homicides database paints only a partial picture—accounting for cases in which an officer killed a felon.

It does not necessarily include cases involving victims like Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and others who were unarmed when confronted by police.
 
The facts are chilling. Systemic racism is "genocide lite".

Any black officers killing black males in the line of duty? How about white cops and white males? Black cops white males?

You are very race driven aren't you. Everything is about race in your eyes. Perhaps these cops, whether white or black, are doing their jobs. Ever think about that? Can some be doing wrong, yes, of course. But what about some of the dead people you are referring to. Think any of them could have placed themselves in a situation where a shooting was justified?
 
I have also not offered any data on donut consumption by cops...perhaps you should blast out a few hundred characters about that too, fuckface.
 
I believe a cop put at least 6 bullets, including a head shot, into an unarmed teen in broad daylight in the middle of the street.

With an eye damage so severe that he may still lose the ability to move it, he was, of course supposed to do a leg shot, wound the kid, keep him alive and then got to jail for even profiling and stopping him in the first place.

Hmmm, hmmm, hmmm,

That's what we're talking about!

Some Social Justice!!! That was one of Nixon's Tin Soldiers all wound up on his free war toys given to him by the war pigs of the power, the gen'rals gathered in their masses,

OH LORD YEAH!
 
Throb would have curled up in fetal position, whimpered and taken his beating like a man.
;)
Of course, that is all his training would allow...
Thats what white people do.

You know, for a "reformed" homosexual, you certainly spend an inordinate amount of time each day fantasizing about me.
:nods:

#MarineHomoFantasies
 
Is this really what you believe? All these witnesses have been coerced? This is one giant conspiracy? Maybe you can just open your eyes to the building facts. A 300 LB young person, after just robbing a store and roughing up the store owner, had an altercation with a law enforcement officer where he severely damaged his eye. Then, while apparently leaving the altercation, according to witnesses he turned around and was rushing towards the officer. And this corroborated by the entry points of the wounds.

So in that moment, the cop dreamed up this scheme where he'd round up the witnesses, some who are likely the same color as the dead person, and coerced them into this conspiracy?

Holy shit.... amazing what some of you people will believe.

According to the Missouri Revised Statutes:

Law enforcement officer's use of force in making an arrest.

563.046. 1. A law enforcement officer need not retreat or desist from efforts to effect the arrest, or from efforts to prevent the escape from custody, of a person he reasonably believes to have committed an offense because of resistance or threatened resistance of the arrestee. In addition to the use of physical force authorized under other sections of this chapter, he is, subject to the provisions of subsections 2 and 3, justified in the use of such physical force as he reasonably believes is immediately necessary to effect the arrest or to prevent the escape from custody.

This is an affirmative defense, meaning the defendant has the burden of proving he "reasonably believed" it was necessary to shoot the kid, either to defend himself or the public.

First shot? Yeah; I can see that if the accounts of the incident are true. Second shot? Maybe. He's probably been trained to double-tap, and was no doubt scared shitless and relying on instinct.

Shots three through five? Wasn't the kid immobilized by the first two? If so, these were unjustifiable.

Shot six, the coup de gras to the forehead? No way Jose. If you did that you would be up for premeditated murder. As this cop should be, and probably won't be.

Yeah; he was scared and seriously pissed off. You still don't get to execute seriously wounded people.
 
Back
Top