an erotic smack in the face

That's my favourite verse. Also,

Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

I am not sure why I always liked that one. Maybe I just like the poetry.
 
And it certainly does not slap anyone in the face just to get its rocks off.
but it's not just to get the slapper's rocks off, it's to get the slappee's rocks off too. mutual pleasure.
 
Looks like we're alone on this island Dolf. You, me, two others and some pervy old dudes. Can't really say I totally expected that.

I knew it would be far from a majority, but I didn't think the numbers would be quite so low.
 
but it's not just to get the slapper's rocks off, it's to get the slappee's rocks off too. mutual pleasure.

Just like all the men in my family, I was taught, as a boy, that you never hit girls. Ever. Especially not in the face. Ever. And then you grow up to be 6'5" and weigh well over two hundred pounds and you understand why you were taught that. And you have a valid, easily understood reason to never hit women in the face. Ever. Because you might hit them too hard. So you don't. At least not in the face.

For me, in reality, it would take a certain kind of woman to break that carefully built wall down. One who really wanted it. Badly. One who could convince me of it, without a doubt. And I would have to trust her immensely.
 
but it's not just to get the slapper's rocks off, it's to get the slappee's rocks off too. mutual pleasure.

It ain't mutual "pleasure, any more than it's physical rather than more psychological...

...and that's where the grave offense occurs - psychologically.

Eg: it must frustratingly bewilder you to no end having to live with the striking conflict of needing to project the sexist feminism you do on this Board so stoutly at times...

...yet intimately knowing you really only get off when a man intentionally mistreats you.

A man who gets his rocks off physically and/or verbally assaulting a woman and a woman who gets her rocks off from that physical and/or verbal assault...

...are simply two peas at different ends of the same psychologically insecure pod.

I've long recognized in my gender the insecurity which enslaves so many males to their infamous outbursts of rebellion against that psychological bondage; rebellion that almost exclusively always results in physical assault against another human being, and most of those times against a woman/women...

...if it was just their insecurity issues, the natural anger I feel against such unjustifiable rebellion resulting from them would serve me quite well. But when women voluntarily, yea even willfully, contribute their own insecurity issues to the abnormal equation, then I become more sad than anything.

And when I read an intelligent, beautiful woman post that her guy hitting her does nothing for her but she accepts it because it makes him happy, then I realize how so many women make themselves their own victims in so many psychologically unhealthy relationships...

...and the word "sad" becomes a champion understatement.

And then I'll read a post from some bozo who wonders that if there is a God, how could God allow such abuse to happen to such good people...

...and I'll shake my head once more because I understand such good people allow it to happen to themselves.
 
It ain't mutual "pleasure, any more than it's physical rather than more psychological...

...and that's where the grave offense occurs - psychologically.

Eg: it must frustratingly bewilder you to no end having to live with the striking conflict of needing to project the sexist feminism you do on this Board so stoutly at times...

...yet intimately knowing you really only get off when a man intentionally mistreats you.

A man who gets his rocks off physically and/or verbally assaulting a woman and a woman who gets her rocks off from that physical and/or verbal assault...

...are simply two peas at different ends of the same psychologically insecure pod.

I've long recognized in my gender the insecurity which enslaves so many males to their infamous outbursts of rebellion against that psychological bondage; rebellion that almost exclusively always results in physical assault against another human being, and most of those times against a woman/women...

...if it was just their insecurity issues, the natural anger I feel against such unjustifiable rebellion resulting from them would serve me quite well. But when women voluntarily, yea even willfully, contribute their own insecurity issues to the abnormal equation, then I become more sad than anything.

And when I read an intelligent, beautiful woman post that her guy hitting her does nothing for her but she accepts it because it makes him happy, then I realize how so many women make themselves their own victims in so many psychologically unhealthy relationships...

...and the word "sad" becomes a champion understatement.

And then I'll read a post from some bozo who wonders that if there is a God, how could God allow such abuse to happen to such good people...

...and I'll shake my head once more because I understand such good people allow it to happen to themselves.

Wannabe. ..
 
There ya go, ladies...

...finally making an appearance is a bozo who proclaims he gets off beating and bruising women.

How many women on LIT get hot at the thought of Disgustipated beating and bruising them?

Don't be shy...

...show the little weasel your love.
 
If I wasn't with Sean, Luk would be in my sights.

That's nice
.

Do you get as hot at the thought of Luk beating and bruising you...

...as you do thinking of Luk and SeanH playing hide the sausage with each other?
 
it was pretty much as I expected. for most it's seen as just over the line, crossing from kink to abuse. something I think we're conditioned to from an early age... we don't freak out at a parent delivering a light smack to a bum or leg, but the same smack to the face gets the cops called. perhaps it's partly instinctive, because a hard enough blow to the face could cause fatal damage.

Idk, I was hit in the face a lot as a child. But apparently I had really abusive parents? Like I was trained from a young age that you don't call CPS because they will separate you and your brothers and you will never see them again and you will have ruined their lives and it will be your fault. So that probably should have been a warning sign and is one of the many reasons my parents are never alone with my kid. And I would never hit my kid, but the location of the smack would never occur to me. Why would the face be worse than the ass unless you were trying to hide bruises? This line of thought is super disturbing to me, because it seems like something an abusive parent would say. "I only hit my kids on the ass or the legs" because there's no way that thought doesn't end with, "Because people won't see those bruises". I mean, I get that your brain is in your head, but the kind of person who would hit a child doesn't think about that. And the kind of parents who spank but wouldn't be considered "abusive" smack their kids upside the head all the time. Like it's a stage before spanking. But I don't care what society says, I just... could never hit her. Ever. Not to operate condition, not to teach a lesson... I just couldn't make myself do it. And I can't understand how the location of where you hit a kid excuses the fact that you hit a kid.
 
but it's not just to get the slapper's rocks off, it's to get the slappee's rocks off too. mutual pleasure.

I honestly just assumed that Doms do things and don't get any pleasure out of it, regardless of how many times I've talked to them about the fact that that's not true. Not just for slapping but for like, wearing strap-ons and choking and a bunch of other shit. I feel guilty after sex- not as much as I used to, but just because I assume that hitting me in the face (or whatever it might be) is something that they don't want to do and are doing just because I asked. And it's like, I TALK. I COMMUNICATE. I know it's not true but for some reason I can't get it out of my head.

What about the choking and arserape?

Holy fucking trifecta for me.
 
Bruising does not equal beating. It's a shame to have to explain that to an adult.

Yes, I understand, Luky...

...how many times have you gotten off smacking women in the face?

BTW:

What do you think gets lovetoread off more:

The thought of you getting off from beating and bruising her...

...or the thought of you and SeanH playing hide the sausage with each other?
 
How about a good old donkey punch to the back of the head? If she asks for it, is that okay, too?
 
How about a good old donkey punch to the back of the head? If she asks for it, is that okay, too?

My Doms say no... nothing that requires the world's most awkward hospital ride. They don't want the nurses to laugh at us.

Edit: Also why I'm not allowed to use TriMix
 
Last edited:
It ain't mutual "pleasure, any more than it's physical rather than more psychological...

...and that's where the grave offense occurs - psychologically.

Eg: it must frustratingly bewilder you to no end having to live with the striking conflict of needing to project the sexist feminism you do on this Board so stoutly at times...

...yet intimately knowing you really only get off when a man intentionally mistreats you.
what's wrong with psychological pleasure? but those delicious endorphins still feel physical to me.

feminism v smack in the chops... you know, it doesn't bewilder or bother or concern me at all. my mind never feels any friction between the two.
 
It was a bat, and I told you, several times that that was not my fault. I blame you and the count, respectively.
you bent over to tie your laces and it just flew up there? the doc didn't believe you and nor do i.
 
If love ain't getting it's rocks off it's not love. Kinky thread, never found a girl who'd even think about letting my slap her though so I have no idea if I'd do it. I do like to play rough though.

Idk, I was hit in the face a lot as a child. But apparently I had really abusive parents? Like I was trained from a young age that you don't call CPS because they will separate you and your brothers and you will never see them again and you will have ruined their lives and it will be your fault. So that probably should have been a warning sign and is one of the many reasons my parents are never alone with my kid. And I would never hit my kid, but the location of the smack would never occur to me. Why would the face be worse than the ass unless you were trying to hide bruises? This line of thought is super disturbing to me, because it seems like something an abusive parent would say. "I only hit my kids on the ass or the legs" because there's no way that thought doesn't end with, "Because people won't see those bruises". I mean, I get that your brain is in your head, but the kind of person who would hit a child doesn't think about that. And the kind of parents who spank but wouldn't be considered "abusive" smack their kids upside the head all the time. Like it's a stage before spanking. But I don't care what society says, I just... could never hit her. Ever. Not to operate condition, not to teach a lesson... I just couldn't make myself do it. And I can't understand how the location of where you hit a kid excuses the fact that you hit a kid.

Cus you can actually hurt people hitting them in the face and legs, and butts and arms not so much. Seriously go watch a boxing match or MMA. People BLOCK with those things because it hurts so much less and doesn't run the risk of giving you a concussion.

My parents taught me the same thing but I'm too smart to have kids so I don't need to worry about leaving them alone. :D
 
Back
Top