Bert_Fegg
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Posts
- 647
You are mixing a medical emergency with a birth control issue Sean. Unless your genital are bleeding that's hardly related.
And I'm still not paying for you to have sex.
Well - apart from the fact that if you're paying for medical insurance, then by your criterion, you are paying for folks to have sex
But more importantly, you're picking one arbitrary criterion and saying that it's a special case in a way that nothing else is. And no counter argument is valid because you say so. And yet we mustn't say you have an overblown sense of entitlement.
In a way, if your arguments were to be taken seriously they'd show the weakness of an individualistic worldview when it's applied to something like healthcare. All you can see is lots of individuals whose lives are improved on your dime at no net benefit to you. You can't - or won't see that Birth control is a public health issue, and when it stops being an economic issue, the whole of society benefits, if for no other reason than the medical system is less taxed. I'm sure there will be no shortage of folks who can rattle off many more ways that universal access to BC benefits society generally [which means you] but because it would benefit a segment of society you don't approve of you're constrained by dogma to oppose it with extreme prejudice.
That's what it looks like from over here anyway.