Crimes of Passion

[Recidiva]

Nope, no mob..

Twitter feed: "OMG! Did you see that? (link to thread)"

So that would be the point.

You guys knew you were ganging.

It's up to anybody's conscience whether or not they will apologize or fess up or just double down on the dumb.

You don't need to tell me, I mostly already know enough to feel sick.

 

[Wings]

Nope, no mob..

Twitter feed: "OMG! Did you see that? (link to thread)"

You do realize if there was nothing to "OMG" at this wouldn't be an issue, right?

 

[bg23]

Nope, no mob..

Twitter feed: "OMG! Did you see that? (link to thread)"

So one should never point out things one finds objectionable/interesting/weird/fascinating/gross lest one be accused of being a mob...?

Are you REALLY that surprised that multiple people found the concept of having an inappropriate relationship with a 14 year old offensive and chose to comment?

If they hadn't wanted to, they wouldn't have. Just as you're posting in defence of your wife because you want to. Not because she told you to, and not because she needs your defence.

 

[Sean]

I'm the only one who "met" him in reality but also "met" him online.

Ulaven "met" him online.

And Ulaven was aware of his character.

So to use it in a sentence.

"I met this guy Sean online and he was a vindictive, ignorant, vicious prick who wasn't anybody's victim."

Ah, so it's like, "I cybered a fourteen year old kid, even though I knew he was fourteen, but I never engaged in any inappropriate behaviour with a minor. Even though I called it a crime, then didn't."

Like that?

 

[Recidiva]

You do realize if there was nothing to "OMG" at this wouldn't be an issue, right?

So there was nothing else on Lit to OMG over that day, you guys had to zero in on someone that you'd already ignored as a group, to troll someone you dislike as a group, and because you guys decided, that makes it true.

Not as individuals, no. But the group narrative ruled.

 

[bg23]

So that would be the point.

You guys knew you were ganging.

It's up to anybody's conscience whether or not they will apologize or fess up or just double down on the dumb.

You don't need to tell me, I mostly already know enough to feel sick.

"Ganging" lol.

So if we agree with each other and we want to voice our opinions we should ...do...what?

Just not post?

I feel like you and UD are ganging up on me. Since you've obviously talked about this behind my back and discussed serious lit strategy. This is obviously a conspiracy and you should not apologise for it.

 

[Sean]

Nope, no mob..

Twitter feed: "OMG! Did you see that? (link to thread)"

Funnily enough, Twitter kind of exists for sharing stuff one finds interesting/ terrible/ funny. Just because I may link a BBC news story about Syria doesn't mean I'm organising the rebel alliance.

 

[Recidiva]

Ah, so it's like, "I cybered a fourteen year old kid, even though I knew he was fourteen, but I never engaged in any inappropriate behaviour with a minor. Even though I called it a crime, then didn't."

Like that?

Find where I said I cybered him. I'll wait.

I played games with him. Actual D&D dungeon-running games and "hang out in the tavern and make up storylines" games.

This from Sean who told MWF that cyber was nothing. Unbelievable hypocrisy of the highest order on top of being guilty of something yourself that you dismissed entirely that I didn't even do.

 

[Sean]

This from Sean who told MWF that cyber was nothing. .

I did what?

 

[bg23]

I find the turns of this thread shocking, which must make me a bg23 minion.

It started with an outrageously glib description by Recidiva about how she had a sexual online relationship with a 14 year old boy, continued with some scatty and illogical back-tracking and finished with a jolly old knees-up.
All along, sprinkled with lots of Recidiva's pseudo-analysis of Recidiva.

I know that sexuality is rarely clear-cut and that people can have fantasies or behaviour that I personally might find shocking or just plain icky, but my feelings on what others do is of absolutely no consequence as long as it takes place between consenting adults.

But this thread was not a debate on what constitutes consent or at what age consent can be given - it was a thread about confessions and Recidiva made one.

She made it pretty clear in her first few posts that she knew that what she'd done overstepped acceptable and even legal behaviour.
But what I found really objectionable in her confession was her almost instant attempts at painting the boy as a co-conspirator. He was 14 when she first knew him and he had been "doing it for years" before that so she knew she was talking to someone very young and vulnerable. Her integrity went rapidly downhill from there and hasn't recovered.

A very sad thread.

I thought this should be re-quoted.

 

[koalabear]

http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn233/koalabear_photo/ththconnie_eatingpopcorn.gif​

 

[Recidiva]

I did what?

You don't remember having a public argument about the fact that you were cybering other women and cyber was apparently nothing?

Regardless of that hypocrisy, if you came up with the idea that we were cybering like little virtual bunnies you may rest assured as I've said sooo many times. That's coming from inside your own head.

 

[Wings]

So there was nothing else on Lit to OMG over that day, you guys had to zero in on someone that you'd already ignored as a group, to troll someone you dislike as a group, and because you guys decided, that makes it true.

Not as individuals, no. But the group narrative ruled.

We share a lot of stuff, sports, politics, family things, work things, sometimes Lit things. If a few people go, whoa-what was that? And a few other people are all "What?!? What was what?" And someone says "This" that's a conspiracy?

 

[bg23]

Find where I said I cybered him. I'll wait.

is there a point? none of your words mean what they mean because it was all obviously a joke!

fooled, we were. fooled!

 

[Sean]

You don't remember having a public argument about the fact that you were cybering other women and cyber was apparently nothing?

Regardless of that hypocrisy, if you came up with the idea that we were cybering like little virtual bunnies you may rest assured as I've said sooo many times. That's coming from inside your own head.

No, I don't. I've had cyber with exactly three women, MWF was one of them. I was single every time it happened. More lies to deflect from your paedophilia?

 

[Recidiva]

We share a lot of stuff, sports, politics, family things, work things, sometimes Lit things. If a few people go, whoa-what was that? And a few other people are all "What?!? What was what?" And someone says "This" that's a conspiracy?

I haven't used the word "conspiracy" except as a joke. You guys are using it to over-inflate what I'm actually saying, again.

I have taken back the assessment that Lorelei was nice, as her twitter feed proves she was just going along with everyone already involved saying stuff like "_________ has a good point." and you guys can check back to see if you think ____________ had a good point or is a vile piece of filth.

 

[Recidiva]

No, I don't. I've had cyber with exactly three women, MWF was one of them. I was single every time it happened. More lies to deflect from your paedophilia?

Okay. Then my point? I was wrong about my memory of what happened and I retract my accusation of hypocrisy.

Will you retract any of your filth or would you prefer it just lie there.

 

[Sean]

Okay. Then my point? I was wrong about my memory of what happened and I retract my accusation of hypocrisy.

Will you retract any of your filth or would you prefer it just lie there.

Retract what, that you changed your story after it became obvious that people found it, and the fact you laughed about it, disgusting? No, not a chance.

 

[Recidiva]

Retract what, that you changed your story after it became obvious that people found it, and the fact you laughed about it, disgusting? No, not a chance.

Then fuck off, you're not a reasonable adult and you're going with the double down on dumb and we're clear.

 

[Recidiva]

So it's okay if Lorelei off the board is agreeing with one of the biggest scumtips here, but subdued_passion is entirely out of bounds if she is polite to them.

Yup. You guys are upstanding.

 

[bg23]

We share a lot of stuff, sports, politics, family things, work things, sometimes Lit things. If a few people go, whoa-what was that? And a few other people are all "What?!? What was what?" And someone says "This" that's a conspiracy?

Well of course it is. Or it's a mob. Or it's a gang.

But not conspiracy, because she said that only jokingly. Because words don't mean what they mean and sometimes they mean multiple things and when she says things we're supposed to know that's not really what she's saying...DUH.

God, and you say you have a 3 digit IQ.

 

[Sean]

Then fuck off, you're not a reasonable adult and you're going with the double down on dumb and we're clear.

Reasonable adults don't engage with fourteen year olds on a sexual basis.

 

[Killswitch]

So it's okay if Lorelei off the board is agreeing with one of the biggest scumtips here, but subdued_passion is entirely out of bounds if she is polite to them.

Yup. You guys are upstanding.

Post some links and screen caps. I have often wondered how much "organizing" goes on behind the scenes be it tweeker or facebook or old school pm's.

I'm not condoning here but speaking as one who has undergone these gang ups, I have always wondered.

 

[bg23]

Reasonable adults don't engage with fourteen year olds on a sexual basis.

oh snap!

 

[Recidiva]

Post some links and screen caps. I have often wondered how much "organizing" goes on behind the scenes be it tweeker or facebook or old school pm's.

No, I won't, just because it is again a privacy situation.

But it was (may not be now) available for viewing. There is an @literotica_com and it is not hard to pick names out and follow threads and conversations and get a good gist of it.

Some are now protected and they weren't last night, so although I am not going to say that it's incriminating, it just means "Shit, everybody read that thread, what have I said in the past five years, fuck, fuck it, just don't chance it."

I'm not expecting everybody to be...let's say..."not flippant" on a medium where you wish to be entertaining, far be it from me.

It isn't a condemnation, it's just a revealing addition to this thread and many other threads where I noted conspicuous absences and conspicuous alliances.