Crimes of Passion

When you have 3 times the posts as the next poster in a thread about yourself, you have lost that thread.
 
So many accusations so few cups to fill them with.

It's not that you're not clever it is the sheep reacting to Laurel outing you. The sheep are preening themselves as if they did a superior job of deduction when in fact the site owner fucked you over.

These same sheep thought KFC was a girl for 10 years. baaaaaaaaaaaabaaaaaaaa

Fact is everyone of them has their ALTS. I very much doubt there are more than 10 separate people on the GB. Case in point: Reci and UD are one and the same.
 
It's not that you're not clever it is the sheep reacting to Laurel outing you. The sheep are preening themselves as if they did a superior job of deduction when in fact the site owner fucked you over.

These same sheep thought KFC was a girl for 10 years. baaaaaaaaaaaabaaaaaaaa

Fact is everyone of them has their ALTS. I very much doubt there are more than 10 separate people on the GB. Case in point: Reci and UD are one and the same.

Deduction, trollio. Laurel never tells, but your tell is a mile wide, at least to my eyes.
 
it saddens me that such an obvious ploy will work.

i'd want none of them on my paintball team.
 
it saddens me that such an obvious ploy will work.

i'd want none of them on my paintball team.

It's kind of inevitable, without someone committed to either the oral history or bumping this thread in perpetuity. The ploy isn't really necessary.
 
Or enough people adding reminders to their custom user titles.

Not that I'd ever suggest that.
 
Or enough people adding reminders to their custom user titles.

Not that I'd ever suggest that.

It's like the reverse of The Scarlet Letter. The Indigo Number?

And I agree with dolf.
 
I originally thought, Reci is a friggin' Sex Offender...

...but, I don't want to be rude.
 
Who cares what it is? Distraction attempt, drama-thread attention seeker, whatever it is, it's weak.

Alts who think posting boring unfunny blah under silly names should hand in their alt card.
 
It doesn't work with smart\sane people which why I find your post so odd.

except that in this thread, it kinda has. smart sane people that i thought were smart/sane anyway, are basically fluffing away completely ignoring the events that have transpired in this thread.

smart/sane people have come to her defence once she played the "victim/ganged up on" card.

it boggles my mind and it makes me incredibly sad how easy it is for a popular female poster to simply change the subject and people will simply forget about the fact that, i dunno, it's BAD TO ABUSE CHILDREN.

i'm not saying everyone in the world has to rush in here and say, "YES RECI YOUS A BAD LADY" but surely the other end of the spectrum is just as bad.
 
Yeah, that's advice I give to people who are upset by trolls.

I'm not upset by trolls.

no.
trolls do generate
hit$
for a spell...

then they generate 'else'.
{it's like an mpg rating}


recidiva was work before she fucked kids...


our crime of passion
is that we don't want to get out of our chairs.

type me a lie.
 
I find the turns of this thread shocking, which must make me a bg23 minion.

It started with an outrageously glib description by Recidiva about how she had a sexual online relationship with a 14 year old boy, continued with some scatty and illogical back-tracking and finished with a jolly old knees-up.
All along, sprinkled with lots of Recidiva's pseudo-analysis of Recidiva.

I know that sexuality is rarely clear-cut and that people can have fantasies or behaviour that I personally might find shocking or just plain icky, but my feelings on what others do is of absolutely no consequence as long as it takes place between consenting adults.

But this thread was not a debate on what constitutes consent or at what age consent can be given - it was a thread about confessions and Recidiva made one.

She made it pretty clear in her first few posts that she knew that what she'd done overstepped acceptable and even legal behaviour.
But what I found really objectionable in her confession was her almost instant attempts at painting the boy as a co-conspirator. He was 14 when she first knew him and he had been "doing it for years" before that so she knew she was talking to someone very young and vulnerable. Her integrity went rapidly downhill from there and hasn't recovered.

A very sad thread.
 
Back
Top