Justice for Trayvon??

What reason would a 17 year old with no history of assault, suddenly attack someone with the intent to kill? It defies logic that he would act in such a manner without serious provocation.
 
What reason would a 17 year old with no history of assault, suddenly attack someone with the intent to kill? It defies logic that he would act in such a manner without serious provocation.
Tryvon has a history of fighting but the judge refused to let it in, because she is politicaly scared.
 
What reason would a 17 year old with no history of assault, suddenly attack someone with the intent to kill? It defies logic that he would act in such a manner without serious provocation.

Tryvon has a history of fighting but the judge refused to let it in, because she is politicaly scared.

The judge seems to be going out of her way to convict.

We have testimony of pot by the ME; it seems that all of that is relevant now...
 
What reason would a 17 year old with no history of assault, suddenly attack someone with the intent to kill? It defies logic that he would act in such a manner without serious provocation.

First of all Martin does have a history of fighting, no assault arrests, but fighting MMA style. I'm pretty certain the defense will bring that to light.

Secondly we have no idea as to Martin's intent, not only do we have no idea, it doesn't matter at all in this case. Only what Zimmerman believed to be Martin's intent is relevant here.

Ishmael
 
It seems more true that it is the center-left's belief that Martin was guilty of walking while black that drives the discussion of this case while the topic of blacks killing blacks in places like Chicago is a no go because the rules of tolerance and diversity prevent us from talking about the nasty little undercurrent of youthful black violence from gun wars over drug turf to wilding flash mobs.

The judge is determined in her PC fashion to prevent any examination of whether or not Martin was caught up in the subculture any more than it was politically correct to follow up on the Russians warning about the Tsarnaev brothers or, speaking of brothers, the very real nature of The Muslim Brotherhood.

It is all part of a pattern revolving around the willingness to create national suicide, including allowing Mexicans to move freely about the country with no intention of assimilating culturally.

One could say, the intent is to find racism everywhere...





... except Affirmative Action.
 
I notice that the prosecution offered NO character witnesses for Trayvon. NO school principals or teachers. NO clergy. NO scout leaders. NO testimonials from anyone, really.
 
I notice that the prosecution offered NO character witnesses for Trayvon. NO school principals or teachers. NO clergy. NO scout leaders. NO testimonials from anyone, really.

For a "retired psychologist", you sure are clueless.

Martin is not on trial, no matter how much you, VatAss and Fox News are trying to spin this.

Zimmerman is the person on trial, and it's the defense who is responsible for the character witnesses, clergy, etc.
 
It seems more true that it is the center-left's belief that Martin was guilty of walking while black that drives the discussion of this case while the topic of blacks killing blacks in places like Chicago is a no go because the rules of tolerance and diversity prevent us from talking about the nasty little undercurrent of youthful black violence from gun wars over drug turf to wilding flash mobs.

The judge is determined in her PC fashion to prevent any examination of whether or not Martin was caught up in the subculture any more than it was politically correct to follow up on the Russians warning about the Tsarnaev brothers or, speaking of brothers, the very real nature of The Muslim Brotherhood.

It is all part of a pattern revolving around the willingness to create national suicide, including allowing Mexicans to move freely about the country with no intention of assimilating culturally.

One could say, the intent is to find racism everywhere...

... except Affirmative Action.

Violence in Chicago and Mexicans roaming around the USA is sooooooo relevant to Zimmerman's murder charge, isn't it Chief? Anything and everything to distract attention from Zimmy.
 
First of all Martin does have a history of fighting, no assault arrests, but fighting MMA style. I'm pretty certain the defense will bring that to light.

Fucking Kheeryst. Boxlicker's gonna pop some serious wood after reading this bullshit.

Pressed bitches just eat up all kinds of hot dick-flavored derp. This bitch I just quoted just put tons of ketchup in his fresh bowl, cuz apparently he thinks Trayvon is a member of the Gracie family.
 
First of all Martin does have a history of fighting, no assault arrests, but fighting MMA style. I'm pretty certain the defense will bring that to light.

Secondly we have no idea as to Martin's intent, not only do we have no idea, it doesn't matter at all in this case. Only what Zimmerman believed to be Martin's intent is relevant here.

Ishmael

Did you get into fights before you turned 18? Did you ever assault anyone before turning 18?
 
Ish's point that Trayvon got into fights is a non-sequiter to the conclusion that he assaulted Zim. I believe I used that term correctly, if not I'm sure someone will come along to correct me.
 
Ish's point that Trayvon got into fights is a non-sequiter to the conclusion that he assaulted Zim. I believe I used that term correctly, if not I'm sure someone will come along to correct me.

JAMESBWHITETRASH will no doubt point out Martin's "Scotch-Irish" background as the reason he got into so many fights.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post
So, how did Z get the broken nose and the gashes on the back of his head?


He started a fight.

Are you seriously contending this short, fat out of shape man who was armed with a pistol started a fist fight with a younger, taller and more athletic man? :eek:
 
What reason would a 17 year old with no history of assault, suddenly attack someone with the intent to kill? It defies logic that he would act in such a manner without serious provocation.

He was somewhat provoked. He saw this "crazy-ass cracker" following him on a dark rainy night. :eek:
 
Ish's point that Trayvon got into fights is a non-sequiter to the conclusion that he assaulted Zim. I believe I used that term correctly, if not I'm sure someone will come along to correct me.

Since Z is claiming self-defense, the fact that TM has a history of assaultive behavior is very relevant to the case.
 
Are you seriously contending this short, fat out of shape man who was armed with a pistol started a fist fight with a younger, taller and more athletic man? :eek:

Yes, I am. A pistol embiggens even the shortest and fattest of conservatives. (see also: Vettebigot, Ishmael, et al)
 
Yes, I am. A pistol embiggens even the shortest and fattest of conservatives. (see also: Vettebigot, Ishmael, et al)

i didn't know we were allowed to make up our own words...? no fair!

i call dibs on "douchebaggery" and "facepalmery"
 
Back
Top