Someone want to explain "Social Justice" to me?

They also believe that people who use the term teabaggers are morons....

The Tea Partiers themselves started using the name "Teabaggers" for themselves first, you know; apparently (at least, we may hope) ignorant that it had another long-established meaning.

Assault on language

As if any confirmation were needed, the fact that the protest has been labeled "teabagging" shows that it was created by a bunch of old white people who had no idea of its more popular meaning. Many in the gay community feel that the teabagging party has tarnished the name of the dirty homosexual act.

In a further proof that the tea party movement thinks Google is some sort of a communist ploy, an Oregon tea party group had bumper stickers saying "We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us."[31] Some protesters have been seen carrying signs that say "LOL" (with Obama campaign logo as O). While Internet language is always evolving, we assume the response from 4chan is probably something along the lines of "ಠ_ಠ".

Insert teabagging jokes here

* Protestors were "full throated" and wanted to give Obama "tongue lashings". Oh yeah, that's dirty baby.[32]
* A Fox News fan wrote in saying he would hang tea bags from his rear-view mirror and antennae (to "support the cause") because he couldn't make it to the actual protests and Gretchen Carlson piped in saying, "You could hang it from your mirror too like fuzzy dice."[33]
* "It's hard to talk when you're teabagging"[34]
* "(I)f you are planning simultaneous tea bagging all around the country, you're going to need a Dick Armey."[35]
* "Teabaggers suck balls."

Not a joke

"But they are nothing new, nothing new at all. They are mostly a bunch of cranky white men with money who are trying desperately to hang on to their privileges. Same as it ever was. They are what we have called "Republicans" for at least the last 30 years."[36]

Jon Stewart once commented - in semi-praise of Ron Paul - that most were just "Moral Majority in three-corner hats."

There were 1.7 million 'baggers at a protest in Washington D.C. in the autumn of 2009 according to Glenn Beck.[37] Not 60-75 thousand as estimated by the DC Park Policiffers.
 
Last edited:
Most are against gay marriage becuase of two basic reasons. Religious and common sense. Gays cant procreate without heterosexual sex or labs/ medical.

So what?

You may or may not like it but its fact and common sense. Marriage was started and always has been between a man and a woman and was a way in which to create and bind families. Live with who you want. They simply dont believe nature allows it to be a marriage as they and all of history has defined.

Marriage is not a thing found in "nature." It is strictly a matter of human law and custom, both of which are always mutable.
 
Because they are going by a moral compass...Usually the bible.. Also common sense You may not like it or agree with it. thats your right

Most are against gay marriage becuase of two basic reasons. Religious and common sense. Gays cant procreate without heterosexual sex or labs/ medical.

Secular nation, Bible can go suck for blow...

What common sense? So what if they can't procreate it's their choice to enter a gay marriage, NOT YOURS AND NOT THE STATES. Like I said, a gay mans 200 dollar tax paid when he hocks up the cash for a marriage licence is every bit as legal/valid as the 200 bucks a straight man hocks up.

Cash is the great equalizer, now are you a freedom loving capitalist who stands for life, liberty, justice and the pursuit of happiness in america? Or are you a pro huge government asshole who wants to tell other people how they should define their lives??



You may or may not like it but its fact and common sense. Marriage was started and always has been between a man and a woman and was a way in which to create and bind families. Live with who you want.

You need to put the Bible down and go to school.

They simply dont believe nature allows it to be a marriage as they and all of history has defined.

Wrong again ass bite...there are almost as many views/definitions/concepts/reasons for marriage as there are different cultures and societies, it's not some evangelical christian exclusive status. And further more for the staggering majority of human history marriages have been used as tribal treaties, to settle disputes, political posturing, etc etc...the list is a mile long but making babies ain't on it....human beings have never had issues with making babies tens of thousands of years before the concept of marriage was even around.
 
Agreed that equality of outcome is often what's behind a lot of social justice messaging...that's the whole idea behind what they preach.

Making social justice quantifiable goes back to my statements on Codified law versus Natural Law and the Law of Equity...all statute-law driven jurisdictions have a balancing vein of law to compensate for the harshness of literal application.

It's a lot like macro versus micro economics as well. Each has their place in harmony with the other.

So, pure Communism doesn't attract for the same reasons as pure Capitalism has fallen out of favor.

Social Democratic models tend to produce the best overall results.

Look at any list of "countries with the best quality of life" and you'll find Social Democracies dominate the list.

Does that have anything at all to do with who creates the lists and thus gets to set the definitions?

;) ;)
 
Secular nation, Bible can go suck for blow...

What common sense? So what if they can't procreate it's their choice to enter a gay marriage, NOT YOURS AND NOT THE STATES. Like I said, a gay mans 200 dollar tax paid when he hocks up the cash for a marriage licence is every bit as legal/valid as the 200 bucks a straight man hocks up.

Cash is the great equalizer, now are you a freedom loving capitalist who stands for life, liberty, justice and the pursuit of happiness in america? Or are you a pro huge government asshole who wants to tell other people how they should define their lives??


You need to put the Bible down and go to school.



Wrong again ass bite...there are almost as many views/definitions/concepts/reasons for marriage as there are different cultures and societies, it's not some evangelical christian exclusive status. And further more for the staggering majority of human history marriages have been used as tribal treaties, to settle disputes, political posturing, etc etc...the list is a mile long but making babies ain't on it....human beings have never had issues with making babies tens of thousands of years before the concept of marriage was even around.

Marriage has been around for thousands of years. It has been defined that entire time as between a man and a woman. Not two men and 3 women ? or 3 women or a dog and a cat. It has been that whether you want to believe it or not. Thats all Im saying. The civil and religous reasons have been obvious. The bible discusses it as well. To create and raise families.

Just because you want 1+1 to be 4 doesnt make it so simply because liberals all got together and said its not fair that it always equals 2. Its not fair and if you say its only 2 then you are a racist or bigot.

Cash is the great equalizer, now are you a freedom loving capitalist who stands for life, liberty, justice and the pursuit of happiness in america? Or are you a pro huge government asshole who wants to tell other people how they should define their lives?? ?????


So then you would agree that not all are equal since they all dont pay equal "fair shares" Its only equal if everyone pays the same rate then right ? and those who dont pay or even worse suck off the rest dont have any equal rights ???

I bet you think Obama should be able to tell us what to eat and drink then ? I bet you believe he can tell you that you have to buy a gun, car, house or health insurance at the threat of a fine right ? I bet you believe Obama can simply just decide what laws he will enforce and follow too right ?
 
What's the quality of life in Greece?

I'm Hungary for some French-fried €PIIGS!
A_J, the Incredulous
__________________
"Ceterum autem censeo, Liberalismum esse delendum"
A_J, the Stupid
 
Impotent men and infertile women therefore should never get married and be banned from doing so, correct?

No Just the ones who cant get pregnant by nature as it was intended. They dont know that they cant have a baby naturally when they are born. Two men or two women know from birth ( unless raised by liberals or taught by liberals) that they cant produce a baby naturally in that relationship. Mother Nature tells us. Bitch at her.

Which people dont want to stop ( the relationship) just not redefining marriage. Im not saying you are going to believe it Im just saying thats the way most people believe...at least until they get to school these days and have liberals tell them they are all bigots if they dont believe that. No wonder our schools suck in so many places. They rare do what school is there for.
 
Cash is the great equalizer, now are you a freedom loving capitalist who stands for life, liberty, justice and the pursuit of happiness in america?

Cash does nothing. People does, whether they got money or not.

And real capitalists don't give a fuck about life, liberty, justice and the pursuit of happiness in America. They only care about their money. If they can make money with you, they love you. If they can make the triple money with killing you after business, they don't hesitate to do.
 
He doesn't know it at all.

But he might be making progress.

The US takes time for these people to understand.

It's a totally different culture.

He does not want to understand; he needs to caricature as his method of bringing us down to the European level, as if our Left were not already dedicated to doing that. He does not even give us any credit for any improvement since FDR and the rise of Progressive Democratic Liberalism.

It is always worse and getting worser...

;) ;) ... worstest country EVER!

I think it is our Constitution. They'll love us when we adopt and embrace South Africa's constitution of human rights and social justice...

Maybe if we elect a black President to prove that the playing field is a bit more level than he sees it.

Think that'll work? :eek:
 
No Just the ones who cant get pregnant by nature as it was intended. They dont know that they cant have a baby naturally when they are born. Two men or two women know from birth ( unless raised by liberals or taught by liberals) that they cant produce a baby naturally in that relationship. Mother Nature tells us. Bitch at her.

Which people dont want to stop ( the relationship) just not redefining marriage. Im not saying you are going to believe it Im just saying thats the way most people believe...at least until they get to school these days and have liberals tell them they are all bigots if they dont believe that. No wonder our schools suck in so many places. They rare do what school is there for.


So you obviously believe that somehow a child born to a woman in a heterosexual marriage but conceived through scientific means is a 'good child' but one born to a single woman or a gay woman using the same means (or even through sexual contact) is a flawed one. The presence of male/female union sanctified by the state is the determining factor in whether a child is valid.
 
As much as you are about Greece.

You do not have to know one thing about Greece to be an expert in its Socio-Economic policies and their eventual and predictable demise despite the fantastic quality of living they enjoy, like all the "civilized" nations of the rotting corpse that is Europe.
 
It's a totally different culture.

Yes, it is.

But, honestly, i think I understand your culture more than you understand mine. which is no big thing, as I don't understand German culture anyway, too. Despite I live here most of the time.
 
Cash does nothing. People does, whether they got money or not.
You're right.

And real capitalists don't give a fuck about life, liberty, justice and the pursuit of happiness in America. They only care about their money. If they can make money with you, they love you. If they can make the triple money with killing you after business, they don't hesitate to do.
And now, you're wrong.

The United States of America sent men to the moon six times.

And you're telling me that was about money??

Do you have any idea what that cost?

You must not.
 
He has lapsed into Saint Peter mode because he cannot defend his views; he can only attack the phantoms that he thinks are everyone else's...


That's usually when I start ignoring him.
 
The United States of America sent men to the moon six times.

And you're telling me that was about money??

Well...my totally biased encyclopedia tells me that it was made of guvment money....



...and I never saw NASA at the NYSE. Must be blind.
 
Well...my totally biased encyclopedia tells me that it was made of guvment money....
...and I never saw NASA at the NYSE. Must be blind.
It absolutely was.

NASA was government funded.

It still is.

It just... now... has nothing more to work with.
 
Kinda like the way Europe's defense against Russia is funded...


;) ;) ... soon, they will run out of US citizens to loot.
 
Back
Top