Heroic feminist kills 3 potential patriarchal oppressors of womankind

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/25/us-crime-southcarolina-murders-idUSTRE79O93M20111025

Mother charged with killing sons for life insurance money

By Harriet McLeod
CHARLESTON, South Carolina | Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:28pm EDT
(Reuters) - A South Carolina mother who told police her son killed three family members and himself has been charged with quadruple murder because she wanted their life insurance money, police said on Tuesday.

Susan Diane Hendricks, 48, was charged with the murder of her two sons, Matthew, 23, and Marshall, 20, her ex-husband Mark Hendricks, 52, and her stepmother, Linda Burns, who was in her mid-60s, police said.

She was also charged with four counts of possession of a weapon during a violent crime. Hendricks was arrested Monday night in an Easley, South Carolina motel.

Police were called to the house in Liberty, South Carolina early on Friday morning, October 14, Pickens County Assistant Sheriff Tim Morgan said. Based on observation at the scene, forensic evidence and interviews with family members, they determined that Hendricks' version of what happened was false.

Family members told police that Hendricks' motive was life insurance money. Hendricks was the beneficiary of multiple life insurance policies taken out by the victims, according to a police report.

Police said Hendricks killed the victims with a handgun that she kept in her night stand.

Pickens County Sheriff David Stone called it "a horrendous act of evil."

There was no evidence that drugs were involved, Morgan said.

"I can't imagine a mom killing her two sons for money," he said.

In 2006, Hendricks shot Doyle "Brian" Teague dead, telling police he had entered her home uninvited and threatened someone. Police determined she had acted in self-defense.

 

[CandiCame]

I swear to god, when I get some more weed, Ima do a vanity search for LJ and read them all in a row. Notsomuch because they aren't horrible, but because LJ has somehow found a way to make infanticide seen funny. That actually takes some motherfucking talent. How the fuck did you get me to not care about infanticide? That's horrible.

If there's a hell I'm burning in it because of you. And not the good part with the unbaptized babies like I used to be able to get into as a richious pagan, that part with the molten gold and the brimstone and the tentacle rape.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I swear to god, when I get some more weed, Ima do a vanity search for LJ and read them all in a row. Notsomuch because they aren't horrible, but because LJ has somehow found a way to make infanticide seen funny. That actually takes some motherfucking talent. How the fuck did you get me to not care about infanticide? That's horrible.

It's because they're male, in this case.

If you cared about them you'd be a woman-hating misogynist!

 

[Lord_Steve]

It's because they're male, in this case.

If you cared about them you'd be a woman-hating misogynist!

it never ceases to be hilarious how you just fundamentally don't understand any of the terms you're so angry at, it's like watching a man punching himself in the face trying to swat invisible bees

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

it never ceases to be hilarious how you just fundamentally don't understand any of the terms you're so angry at, it's like watching a man punching himself in the face trying to swat invisible bees

^^^ Spoken like a truly spineless wimp.

Keep chasing me around, wimp! That's why I post these threads.

 

[Lord_Steve]

^^^ Spoken like a truly spineless wimp.

Keep chasing me around, wimp! That's why I post these threads.

you heard it here first, folks: knowing what things and concepts mean is a sign of weakness!

LT is truly blessed to have been spared that burden since birth

 

[VaticanAssassin]

you heard it here first, folks: knowing what things and concepts mean is a sign of weakness!

LT is truly blessed to have been spared that burden since birth

You realize you are arguing with a retard right?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

you heard it here first, folks: knowing what things and concepts mean is a sign of weakness!

LT is truly blessed to have been spared that burden since birth

You don't know the difference between your head and your ass, much less the meaning of anything.

If I got into a debate with you about what feminism means I would just sit back and watch you babble yourself right to death. You'd probably eat your own tail and make like a Cheshire cat.

 

[badbabysitter]

^^^ Spoken like a truly spineless wimp.

Keep chasing me around, wimp! That's why I post these threads.

http://silellak.com/lets_play/InternetToughGuy.jpg

 

[Lord_Steve]

You realize you are arguing with a retard right?

i wouldn't call it "arguing," per se.

more like giggling while he helplessly flails around and smears muck on himself

 

[Lord_Steve]

You don't know the difference between your head and your ass, much less the meaning of anything.

If I got into a debate with you about what feminism means I would just sit back and watch you babble yourself right to death. You'd probably eat your own tail and make like a Cheshire cat.

you are just too cute to handle

is that why you fled that last thread as soon as corroborated facts began being posted and, after your terrible arguments were immediately debunked, showed up at the end to claim victory?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

i wouldn't call it "arguing," per se.

more like giggling while he helplessly flails around and smears muck on himself

Talk about not understanding the meaning of words.

What you call 'giggling' is what most humans call jumping up and down while scratching your armpits and shitting in your own pants.

 

[Lord_Steve]

Talk about not understanding the meaning of words.

What you call 'giggling' is what most humans call jumping up and down while scratching your armpits and shitting in your own pants.

case in point!

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

you are just too cute to handle

is that why you fled that last thread as soon as corroborated facts began being posted and, after your terrible arguments were immediately debunked, showed up at the end to claim victory?

You posted no facts, dude. You didn't even have cites. I did.

 

[Lord_Steve]

You posted no facts, dude. You didn't even have cites. I did.

hahahahaha oh my godddd every time i think you can't make yourself look more dumb

two points:

1. yes i did! for several pages, in fact. including hard census data and so forth. thanks for proving you didn't read your own thread!

2. there is literally nothing in that article you posted that supports an anti-feminist perspective whatsoever. it even helpfully points out that only 22% of married women today make more than their husbands, further excellent proof of the unfair economic disparity between men and women!

the very article you posted undermines your ideology which you might have known if you had taken the time to read it

here's a cool quote from that article:

“I’m a happier, more fulfilled individual because of it and he’s a happier, more fulfilled individual being a stay-at-home parent,” she said. “The challenges come up when we listen to everybody else, when we listen to society’s norms."

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

hahahahaha oh my godddd every time i think you can't make yourself look more dumb

two points:

1. yes i did! for several pages, in fact. including hard census data and so forth. thanks for proving you didn't read your own thread!

What you did was rant and rave like a wounded effeminate manservant.

2. there is literally nothing in that article you posted that supports an anti-feminist perspective whatsoever. it even helpfully points out that only 22% of married women today make more than their husbands, further excellent proof of the unfair economic disparity between men and women!

Of course, it couldn't have ANYTHING to do with the types of careers women choose, or that many prefer to stay home.

And none of your arguments address this:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2010-09-01-single-women_N.htm

Single, childless women in their twenties are finding success in the city: They're out-earning their male counterparts in the USA's biggest metropolitan areas.

Women ages 22 to 30 with no husband and no kids earn a median $27,000 a year, 8% more than comparable men in the top 366 metropolitan areas, according to 2008 U.S. Census Bureau data crunched by the New York research firm Reach Advisors and released Wednesday. The women out-earn men in 39 of the 50 biggest cities and match them in another eight. The disparity is greatest in Atlanta, where young, childless single women earn 21% more than male counterparts.

You see, arguing with idiots like you is a waste of time. You will always get mad and start flinging poo. I just wasted a pile of facts on you, knowing full well your reading skills are absolute shit.

I shall not do so again. From here on I shall simply mock and make fun of you.

 

[Lord_Steve]

What you did was rant and rave like a wounded effeminate manservant.


Of course, it couldn't have ANYTHING to do with the types of careers women choose, or that many prefer to stay home.

And none of your arguments address this:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2010-09-01-single-women_N.htm



You see, arguing with idiots like you is a waste of time. You will always get mad and start flinging poo. I just wasted a pile of facts on you, knowing full well your reading skills are absolute shit.

I shall not do so again. From here on I shall simply mock and make fun of you.

okay! have fun with that!

btw your "pile of facts" is hilariously flawed and i can't believe you have the audacity to insult my "reading skills" when you obviously didn't read the very first article you posted to the point where it disagreed with your fantasy world.

also the fact that women in a very specific region and demographic outperform their male counterparts proves literally nothing when contrasted with the fact that as a group women are worse paid and less politically represented than men.

you can't point to a single exception in an overall set of averaged data and claim it disproves the whole. that's like a textbook bad faith argument.

i know, of course, you are too stupid and stubborn for any of this to make sense to you. so just keep on keepin on!

 

[CandiCame]

you heard it here first, folks: knowing what things and concepts mean is a sign of weakness!

LT is truly blessed to have been spared that burden since birth

Knowing is half the battle.

I wish they'd tell me what the other half is.

 

[Lord_Steve]

Knowing is half the battle.

I wish they'd tell me what the other half is.

violence

 

[CandiCame]

violence

Seriously!? I got that shit. You get the knowledge.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

okay! have fun with that!

btw your "pile of facts" is hilariously flawed and i can't believe you have the audacity to insult my "reading skills"

WHAT reading skills? There's nothing there to insult, you wounded effeminate manservant.

 

[Lord_Steve]

WHAT reading skills? There's nothing there to insult, you wounded effeminate manservant.

quick reminder that you demonstrably didn't read the very first article you posted (and then reposted to prove that you did, indeed, cite a source)

 

[Kurokami]

And none of your arguments address this:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2010-09-01-single-women_N.htm



You see, arguing with idiots like you is a waste of time. You will always get mad and start flinging poo. I just wasted a pile of facts on you, knowing full well your reading skills are absolute shit.

I shall not do so again. From here on I shall simply mock and make fun of you.

Well, okay: let's address this: Just on a surface level, the fact that "women are earning as much/more than men" is a news story at all is pretty telling. Just throwing that out there.

 

[badbabysitter]

Well, okay: let's address this: Just on a surface level, the fact that "women are earning as much/more than men" is a news story at all is pretty telling. Just throwing that out there.

pointing out the obvious is a clever feminazi trick that LT refuses to fall for

 

[Kurokami]

pointing out the obvious is a clever feminazi trick that LT refuses to fall for

It's like trying to debate with a wall, I can tell just from reading his posts. Still, this is one futile effort that's just entertaining enough for me to join in on.