TexasWife25
Porn Buddy
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2011
- Posts
- 6,951
Women have the option to opt of parenting. Why shouldn't men?
Once a child is born, how do women have any options that men dont?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Women have the option to opt of parenting. Why shouldn't men?
...83%
Maybe TexasWife is just sexist.Women have the option to opt of parenting. Why shouldn't men?
Well .. if 83% are women then, 17% are men.
Once a child is born, how do women have any options that men dont?
Once a child is born, how do women have any options that men dont?
That's like saying "once an election is held how do men have any options that women don't", when you can't vote as a woman. It's a dishonest arguement.
A woman can drop the baby off at any fire dept, police dept or hospital. It's the law in many states. They cannot detain her or ask where the father is. They can't ask anything for that matter.
We covered this already.
So you're arguing men should have a say in if a woman has an abortion?
So you're arguing men should have a say in if a woman has an abortion?
I think he's saying if women have a window of a few months to opt out of parenthood then men should have the same right.
Women have a window to opt out of creating life, men dont get that option.
Women have a window to opt out of creating life, men dont get that option.
I don't remember writing that I think men should have the option to opt out of parenting. I simply said, if I was the one who took his choice away and he had no interest in being in the child's life or supporting the child financially I'd not force him to do so. I'd opt out of taking his money.I am, apparently the only person who thinks men shouldn't have the option to opt out of parenting.
I didnt realize I was a minority in this
I don't remember writing that I think men should have the option to opt out of parenting. I simply said, if I was the one who took his choice away and he had no interest in being in the child's life or supporting the child financially I'd not force him to do so. I'd opt out of taking his money.
Well apparently it didn't sink in.
I don't remember writing that I think men should have the option to opt out of parenting. I simply said, if I was the one who took his choice away and he had no interest in being in the child's life or supporting the child financially I'd not force him to do so. I'd opt out of taking his money.
I don't remember writing that I think men should have the option to opt out of parenting. I simply said, if I was the one who took his choice away and he had no interest in being in the child's life or supporting the child financially I'd not force him to do so. I'd opt out of taking his money.
I admit what is a good idea?So you admit it's a good idea.
They had to change this law in a lot of places because people were dropping off their unruly teenagers.
I noticed that.and i used the words ''i'd'' and ''but that's just me''.
I personally, wouldnt either, but I dont begrudge(not saying you do) the women who struggle and need the assistance from the fathers of their children.
I do because it's an outdated way of supporting children from days when women were viewed as property and responsibity of the men who fuck them. If your interest is truly that of the child the state should pick up the tab and not waste resources on fruitless moral crusades of a bygone era. Feeding, clothing, and educating children who need it I consider tax money well spent.
I admit what is a good idea?