busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
eating habits
CONGRESSMAN: Michelle Obama 'has large posterior herself'...Yet she lectures US on!!!
- Thread starter busybody..
- Start date
busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
Lawmaker Says Michelle Obama Has ‘Large Posterior’
By Betsy Rothstein on December 21, 2011 3:14 PM
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.), known for his cantankerous ways and for not speaking to media unless it’s his idea, was overheard at the Delta Crown lounge at Reagan National Airport today talking on his cellphone about an incident he said occurred three weeks ago while at an Episcopal church auction. Please note, a church auction.
Our source, a Democratic operative who heard the whole thing, said he was “very loud”. Sensenbrenner was overheard saying that after buying all their “crap” (his word) a woman approached him and praised first lady Michelle Obama. He told the woman that Michelle should practice what she preaches — “she lectures us on eating right while she has a large posterior herself.”
Hold the phone! Did the congressman just say Michelle Obama has a FAT ASS?
The operative said it sounded like he was on the phone with a staffer who was telling him that someone in the media would likely write about his comments (concerning something) to which he said it was heresy and just liberal media bias to print gossip. But “he stands by his remarks.”
At this juncture we’d like to point out that Sensenbrenner, who typically celebrates his birthdays by eating Cheetos and shrimp, has no business discussing fat asses while having quite the big butt himself. And we realize that our picture is only head shot, but if this is what his noggin looks like, just imagine his backside. A note to the Congressman: “Let’s Move” could do you a WORLD of good. And lay off the Cheetos!
We reached out to Amanda Infield in Sensenbrenner’s Washington press office by both email and phone. When and if she responds, we’ll provide her quotes.
UPDATE: Sensenbrenner’s spokeswoman responds. Read here.
Read the email I sent to Amanda after the jump…
Amanda,
Hi. I write FishbowlDC. Your boss was overheard in Reagan National Airport today saying the following. He was saying he was attending a church auction some three weeks ago when a woman approached and praised Michelle Obama. This is when he said, “she lectures us on eating right while she has a large posterior herself.”
So basically your boss told a constituent that the first lady has a big butt. My questions: 1. Does the Congressman realize that he, also, has a large behind? 2. Does he always speak so loudly on the cell phone?
Thanks very much. If you have a comment, please let me know.
Betsy
By Betsy Rothstein on December 21, 2011 3:14 PM
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.), known for his cantankerous ways and for not speaking to media unless it’s his idea, was overheard at the Delta Crown lounge at Reagan National Airport today talking on his cellphone about an incident he said occurred three weeks ago while at an Episcopal church auction. Please note, a church auction.
Our source, a Democratic operative who heard the whole thing, said he was “very loud”. Sensenbrenner was overheard saying that after buying all their “crap” (his word) a woman approached him and praised first lady Michelle Obama. He told the woman that Michelle should practice what she preaches — “she lectures us on eating right while she has a large posterior herself.”
Hold the phone! Did the congressman just say Michelle Obama has a FAT ASS?
The operative said it sounded like he was on the phone with a staffer who was telling him that someone in the media would likely write about his comments (concerning something) to which he said it was heresy and just liberal media bias to print gossip. But “he stands by his remarks.”
At this juncture we’d like to point out that Sensenbrenner, who typically celebrates his birthdays by eating Cheetos and shrimp, has no business discussing fat asses while having quite the big butt himself. And we realize that our picture is only head shot, but if this is what his noggin looks like, just imagine his backside. A note to the Congressman: “Let’s Move” could do you a WORLD of good. And lay off the Cheetos!
We reached out to Amanda Infield in Sensenbrenner’s Washington press office by both email and phone. When and if she responds, we’ll provide her quotes.
UPDATE: Sensenbrenner’s spokeswoman responds. Read here.
Read the email I sent to Amanda after the jump…
Amanda,
Hi. I write FishbowlDC. Your boss was overheard in Reagan National Airport today saying the following. He was saying he was attending a church auction some three weeks ago when a woman approached and praised Michelle Obama. This is when he said, “she lectures us on eating right while she has a large posterior herself.”
So basically your boss told a constituent that the first lady has a big butt. My questions: 1. Does the Congressman realize that he, also, has a large behind? 2. Does he always speak so loudly on the cell phone?
Thanks very much. If you have a comment, please let me know.
Betsy
busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
so, nothing
busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
I will never ignore her
MeeMie
No Spam Here
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2005
- Posts
- 7,328
http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/mogard.jpg
"here, have a potato ... I made it myself"
as if ....
"here, have a potato ... I made it myself"
as if ....
MeeMie
No Spam Here
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2005
- Posts
- 7,328
Michelle Obama’s Unsavory School Lunch Flop
By Michelle Malkin
The road to gastric hell is paved with first lady Michelle Obama’s Nanny State intentions. Don’t take my word for it. School kids in Los Angeles have blown the whistle on the east wing chef-in-chief’s healthy lunch diktats. Get your Pepto Bismol ready. The taste of government waste is indigestion-inducing.
According to a weekend report by the Los Angeles Times, the city’s “trailblazing introduction of healthful school lunches has been a flop.” In response to the public hectoring and financial inducement of Mrs. Obama’s federally subsidized anti-obesity campaign, the district dropped chicken nuggets, corn dogs and flavored milk from the menu for “beef jambalaya, vegetable curry, pad Thai, lentil and brown rice cutlets, and quinoa and black-eyed pea salads.”
Sounds delectable in theory. But in practice, the initiative has been what L.A. Unified’s food services director Dennis Barrett plainly concludes is a “disaster.” While the Obama administration has showered the nation’s second-largest school district with nutrition awards, thousands of students voted with their upset tummies and abandoned the program. A forbidden-food black market — stoked not just by students, but also by teachers — is now thriving. Moreover, “principals report massive waste, with unopened milk cartons and uneaten entrees being thrown away.”
This despite a massive increase in spending on nutritional improvements — from $2 million to $20 million alone in the last five years on fresh produce.
This despite a nearly half-billion-dollar budget shortfall and 3,000 layoffs earlier this year.
Earlier this spring, L.A. school officials acknowledged that the sprawling district is left with a whopping 21,000 uneaten meals a day, in part because the federal school lunch program “sometimes requires more food to be served than a child wants to eat.” The leftovers will now be donated to nonprofit agencies. But after the recipients hear about students’ reports of moldy noodles, undercooked meat and hard rice, one wonders how much of the “free” food will go down the hatch — or down the drain. Ahhh, savor the flavor of one-size-fits-all mandates.
There’s nothing wrong with encouraging our children to eat healthier, of course.
There’s nothing wrong with well-run, locally based and parent-driven efforts.
But as I’ve noted before, the federal foodie cops care much less about students’ waistlines than they do about boosting government and public union payrolls.
In a little-noticed announcement several months ago, Obama health officials declared their intention to use school lunch applications to boost government health care rolls. Never mind the privacy concerns of parents.
Big Government programs “for the children” are never about the children. If they were, you wouldn’t see Chicago public school officials banning students from bringing home-packed meals made by their own parents. In April, The Chicago Tribune reported that “unless they have a medical excuse, they must eat the food served in the cafeteria.” The bottom line? Banning homemade lunches means a fatter payday for the school and its food provider.
Remember: The unwritten mantra driving Mrs. Obama’s federal school lunch meddling and expansion is: “Cede the children, feed the state.” And the biggest beneficiaries of her efforts over the past three years have been her husband’s deep-pocketed pals at the Service Employees International Union. There are 400,000 workers who prepare and serve lunch to American schoolchildren. SEIU represents tens of thousands of those workers and is trying to unionize many more at all costs.
In L.A., the district’s cafeteria fund is $20 million in the hole thanks to political finagling by SEIU Local 99. The union’s left-wing allies on the school board and in the mayor’s office pressured the district to adopt reckless fiscal policies awarding gold-plated health benefits to part-time cafeteria workers in the name of “social justice.” As one school board member who opposed the budget-busting entitlements said: “Everyone in this country deserves health benefits. But it was a very expensive proposal. And it wasn’t done at the bargaining table, which is where health benefits are usually negotiated. And no one had any idea where the money was going to come from.”
Early next year, Mrs. Obama will use the “success” of her child nutrition campaign to hawk a new tome and lobby for more money and power in concert with her husband’s re-election campaign. It’s a recipe for more half-baked progressivism served with a side order of bitter arugula.
By Michelle Malkin
The road to gastric hell is paved with first lady Michelle Obama’s Nanny State intentions. Don’t take my word for it. School kids in Los Angeles have blown the whistle on the east wing chef-in-chief’s healthy lunch diktats. Get your Pepto Bismol ready. The taste of government waste is indigestion-inducing.
According to a weekend report by the Los Angeles Times, the city’s “trailblazing introduction of healthful school lunches has been a flop.” In response to the public hectoring and financial inducement of Mrs. Obama’s federally subsidized anti-obesity campaign, the district dropped chicken nuggets, corn dogs and flavored milk from the menu for “beef jambalaya, vegetable curry, pad Thai, lentil and brown rice cutlets, and quinoa and black-eyed pea salads.”
Sounds delectable in theory. But in practice, the initiative has been what L.A. Unified’s food services director Dennis Barrett plainly concludes is a “disaster.” While the Obama administration has showered the nation’s second-largest school district with nutrition awards, thousands of students voted with their upset tummies and abandoned the program. A forbidden-food black market — stoked not just by students, but also by teachers — is now thriving. Moreover, “principals report massive waste, with unopened milk cartons and uneaten entrees being thrown away.”
This despite a massive increase in spending on nutritional improvements — from $2 million to $20 million alone in the last five years on fresh produce.
This despite a nearly half-billion-dollar budget shortfall and 3,000 layoffs earlier this year.
Earlier this spring, L.A. school officials acknowledged that the sprawling district is left with a whopping 21,000 uneaten meals a day, in part because the federal school lunch program “sometimes requires more food to be served than a child wants to eat.” The leftovers will now be donated to nonprofit agencies. But after the recipients hear about students’ reports of moldy noodles, undercooked meat and hard rice, one wonders how much of the “free” food will go down the hatch — or down the drain. Ahhh, savor the flavor of one-size-fits-all mandates.
There’s nothing wrong with encouraging our children to eat healthier, of course.
There’s nothing wrong with well-run, locally based and parent-driven efforts.
But as I’ve noted before, the federal foodie cops care much less about students’ waistlines than they do about boosting government and public union payrolls.
In a little-noticed announcement several months ago, Obama health officials declared their intention to use school lunch applications to boost government health care rolls. Never mind the privacy concerns of parents.
Big Government programs “for the children” are never about the children. If they were, you wouldn’t see Chicago public school officials banning students from bringing home-packed meals made by their own parents. In April, The Chicago Tribune reported that “unless they have a medical excuse, they must eat the food served in the cafeteria.” The bottom line? Banning homemade lunches means a fatter payday for the school and its food provider.
Remember: The unwritten mantra driving Mrs. Obama’s federal school lunch meddling and expansion is: “Cede the children, feed the state.” And the biggest beneficiaries of her efforts over the past three years have been her husband’s deep-pocketed pals at the Service Employees International Union. There are 400,000 workers who prepare and serve lunch to American schoolchildren. SEIU represents tens of thousands of those workers and is trying to unionize many more at all costs.
In L.A., the district’s cafeteria fund is $20 million in the hole thanks to political finagling by SEIU Local 99. The union’s left-wing allies on the school board and in the mayor’s office pressured the district to adopt reckless fiscal policies awarding gold-plated health benefits to part-time cafeteria workers in the name of “social justice.” As one school board member who opposed the budget-busting entitlements said: “Everyone in this country deserves health benefits. But it was a very expensive proposal. And it wasn’t done at the bargaining table, which is where health benefits are usually negotiated. And no one had any idea where the money was going to come from.”
Early next year, Mrs. Obama will use the “success” of her child nutrition campaign to hawk a new tome and lobby for more money and power in concert with her husband’s re-election campaign. It’s a recipe for more half-baked progressivism served with a side order of bitter arugula.
phrodeau
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 78,588
Sounds like local level efforts are being made. They can earn boasting rights for the fattest kids in the country.
Seriously, have Republicans done anything about our nation's problems other than whine about the opposition's efforts to solve them?
Seriously, have Republicans done anything about our nation's problems other than whine about the opposition's efforts to solve them?
MeeMie
No Spam Here
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2005
- Posts
- 7,328
I guess you didn't hear about the 38 bills passed in the House with a Republican majority that are shelved in the Senate by Harry Reid and voted down by the Democrat majority.
Nobody believes that bullshit spin, btw
phrodeau
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 78,588
Which ones in particular? The one attempting to reduce food safety regulations, maybe?I guess you didn't hear about the 38 bills passed in the House with a Republican majority that are shelved in the Senate by Harry Reid and voted down by the Democrat majority.
Nobody believes that bullshit spin, btw
renard_ruse
Break up Amazon
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2007
- Posts
- 16,094
Who says "posterior" anyway???
My mother was very strict growing up and we'd get in trouble for saying "butt" much less "ass", but at least we were alllowed to say "rump" or "bottom." What kind of dork says "posterior"?
My mother was very strict growing up and we'd get in trouble for saying "butt" much less "ass", but at least we were alllowed to say "rump" or "bottom." What kind of dork says "posterior"?
Karen Kraft
29
- Joined
- May 18, 2002
- Posts
- 36,253
So.....
She had dumps like a truck truck truck
Thighs like what what what
Baby move your butt butt butt
Uh
I think to sing it again
She had dumps like a truck truck truck
Thighs like what what what
All night long
Let me see that thong
garbage can
North by Northeast
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2005
- Posts
- 57,302
GracefullyYours
Illuminaughty
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Posts
- 4,282
busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
Johnny_Ray_Wilson
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2006
- Posts
- 14,888
The senator could have been more diplomatic and called her butt an onion booty.
busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
could have called it another cuntry
phrodeau
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 78,588
Busybody's wife looks like this, according to him.
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=39455464#post39455464
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Rq_LEWW7gBA/TYHyL8FfLAI/AAAAAAAAAqU/Tml0M_5NnJk/198656063_6bc9c6e93c_o.jpg
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?p=39455464#post39455464
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Rq_LEWW7gBA/TYHyL8FfLAI/AAAAAAAAAqU/Tml0M_5NnJk/198656063_6bc9c6e93c_o.jpg
NeverEndingMe
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2011
- Posts
- 15,925
why is this a mystery? michelle obama sits on her ass all day. what has she ever done in her life? sure she has pushed to make Burgers illegal yet she sneaks off to the local 5 guys burger joint. she's just another angry hypocrite
eating habits
Very_Bad_Man
Evil Genius Incognito
- Joined
- May 15, 2011
- Posts
- 7,348
I don't think she is fat. Her body is fairly average for a middle aged women with children. You don't have to be a fitness guru to promote a good diet.
busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
Similar threads
