BLoved
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2010
- Posts
- 1,457
It is stated in the rules that Literotica promotes diversity and "Free Speech"
So what are we to make of a mod who invents a 'rule' so as to create an excuse to toss the only person talking about love and bdsm?
The claim is we cannot discuss stories in BDSM Talk if we post the story verbatim.
We can, however, discuss stories in BDSM Talk if we refer to the stories through a link.
Nowhere is there a rule that states this.
The mod refuses to point to the rule she claims states this.
And despite the fact there is no rule stating this, we are all supposed to know this 'rule' and abide by it or be tossed.
So in what way does the invention of a 'rule' so as to single out one individual who is the only individual discussing love and bdsm and threaten him with banishment promote "diversity and free speech"?
So what are we to make of a mod who invents a 'rule' so as to create an excuse to toss the only person talking about love and bdsm?
The claim is we cannot discuss stories in BDSM Talk if we post the story verbatim.
We can, however, discuss stories in BDSM Talk if we refer to the stories through a link.
Nowhere is there a rule that states this.
The mod refuses to point to the rule she claims states this.
And despite the fact there is no rule stating this, we are all supposed to know this 'rule' and abide by it or be tossed.
So in what way does the invention of a 'rule' so as to single out one individual who is the only individual discussing love and bdsm and threaten him with banishment promote "diversity and free speech"?