Liar
now with 17% more class
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Posts
- 43,715
NOTE: This is not a tread to post general discussion and opinions for or against moderating. The first one who does better block their PM box, for I will retaliate with scat porn.
Ok, that being said... It's been suggested by some that this place needs a moderator. A few have argued for it actively, others have butted in to the discussion to say "yeah, me too". Others have said "no thanks, we don't need no Big Brother here, a little filth is the price we pay for freedom of speech". And some, like myself, are fence-sitting cowards.
Which side is the bigger one is irrelevant. Fact is, a not insignificant number of people want it.
So what do they want? I suggest we try to find that out.
Let's leave aside the "too many political thread" issue at the moment (let's face it, some might think political discussion is more relevant and writing related than social threads like "what's your mood?") and focus on more typical topics of moderation. Hate speech, harassment, threats, violation of privacy (posting PMs without consent for instance), beyond-the-pale nastiness, and so on. I don't know exactly what, but I guess those who feel the need for it know what it is they feel needs to be moderated.
So here's what I suggest. An open thread, maybe this one, where those in favor can log what they think should have been deleted/edited/resulted in a warning or bannination. So that the rest of us can get a picture of the precieved problem, and see what we think about it.
Some simple guidelines would be in order:
1. Quote, cut/paste or link directly to the post with the offending content.
2. Explain why it is mod-worthy.
3. State what you think is an appropriate action for a would-be moderator regarding the post/poster.
Replies are of course allowed, but should be kept at a minimum. Agree or disagree with a show-and-tell, and explain what part you disagree with and why.
Comments? Is it possible? Will moderation proponents participate? Would it deteriorate into a pointless shout-fest?
Ok, that being said... It's been suggested by some that this place needs a moderator. A few have argued for it actively, others have butted in to the discussion to say "yeah, me too". Others have said "no thanks, we don't need no Big Brother here, a little filth is the price we pay for freedom of speech". And some, like myself, are fence-sitting cowards.
So what do they want? I suggest we try to find that out.
Let's leave aside the "too many political thread" issue at the moment (let's face it, some might think political discussion is more relevant and writing related than social threads like "what's your mood?") and focus on more typical topics of moderation. Hate speech, harassment, threats, violation of privacy (posting PMs without consent for instance), beyond-the-pale nastiness, and so on. I don't know exactly what, but I guess those who feel the need for it know what it is they feel needs to be moderated.
So here's what I suggest. An open thread, maybe this one, where those in favor can log what they think should have been deleted/edited/resulted in a warning or bannination. So that the rest of us can get a picture of the precieved problem, and see what we think about it.
Some simple guidelines would be in order:
1. Quote, cut/paste or link directly to the post with the offending content.
2. Explain why it is mod-worthy.
3. State what you think is an appropriate action for a would-be moderator regarding the post/poster.
Replies are of course allowed, but should be kept at a minimum. Agree or disagree with a show-and-tell, and explain what part you disagree with and why.
Comments? Is it possible? Will moderation proponents participate? Would it deteriorate into a pointless shout-fest?