3113
Hello Summer!
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2005
- Posts
- 13,823
Um...Um...think you might wanna see the movie before you say thatvoluptuary_manque said:Well, that just goes to show that there is at least some modest understanding of military decorum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Um...Um...think you might wanna see the movie before you say thatvoluptuary_manque said:Well, that just goes to show that there is at least some modest understanding of military decorum.
Um...Um...think you might wanna see the movie before you say that![]()
We just got back from watching it, and this movie was so much fun!
It was very faithful to the original series, and there were even a couple of moments where I felt like standing up and cheering.
Great flick, go see it.![]()
Agreed. And the discrepancies are tied up all nice & tidy with the alternate timeline bow.
No Spoilers now!
Cloudy, did young son like it? I don't suppose he's ever seen the original series or has he?![]()
Someone shoot me a spoiler if they can..... please.... Do they explain how Kirk hacks the Kobayashi Maru?
He has to blow Spock for the answer...no, wait, that was a fanfic I read once.Someone shoot me a spoiler if they can..... please.... Do they explain how Kirk hacks the Kobayashi Maru?
Edited. Sorry, they show Kirk beating the Kobayashi Maru, but they do not explain how he did.Someone shoot me a spoiler if they can..... please.... Do they explain how Kirk hacks the Kobayashi Maru?
Edited. Sorry, they show Kirk beating the Kobayashi Maru, but they do not explain how he did.
I enjoyed the movie immensely, but wasn't fond of the whole Spock/Uhura thing. Did anyone like it? I thought it fell flat.
I also felt Chekov was miscast, but man did Simon Pegg peg the role of Scotty (PS, I loved his little alien sidekick - what a laugh). Also, as a chick, I noticed why all the ladies are attracted to Kirk ... big package!
No. They didn't. They said he "somehow hacked into the system" and cheated, but they didn't explain how he did.They did explain how he beat it.
No. They didn't. They said he "somehow hacked into the system" and cheated, but they didn't explain how he did.
Kirk nailed the old Shatner move in the last scene when he entered the bridge.![]()
I disagree about the casting for Checkov.
I mean, he doesn't look like Walter Koenig. But I enjoyed his interpretation of the character and loved the enthusiastic, "I can do that!" scene. I totally bought that he was a seventeen year old whiz kid and while I thought the accent was a bit overdone, I think he played the character just fine.
But I keep hearing this bitching that he doesn't look right. Curly hair doesn't throw me that much.
Hell, I thought the person that nailed it the best was Karl Urban as Bones. And the support for that position has been pretty widespread, meaning I wasn't the only one.
Yet, I've still seen a couple of "No way, Eomer can't be Dr. McCoy" comments out there. At some point, while you do everything you can to please the audience, there has to be a place to step back.
So, I am fine with the way the kid played Checkov, even if the physical appearance gap was bigger for him than it was for the others.
I'm interested to hear why Charley didn't like the casting choice... and hoping that, considering the source as someone we know isn't shallow, it has zero to do with him not looking like Koenig.
The moment he started speaking, I couldn't buy into the character. The delivery of his lines were staid. I simply thought he was a lousy actor. PS? It didn't help that he didn't look like Chekov.I'm interested to hear why Charley didn't like the casting choice... and hoping that, considering the source as someone we know isn't shallow, it has zero to do with him not looking like Koenig.
Hell, I thought the person that nailed it the best was Karl Urban as Bones. And the support for that position has been pretty widespread, meaning I wasn't the only one.
Agreed. As we seem to not be worrying about spoilers any more as enough folk have actually seen it...I've always loved Leonard Nimoy in that role, and thought he was irreplaceable, but Zachary Quinto did a great job.
Very much apples and oranges. This is a roller coaster ride, not a dissertation. And I'm so damn glad of it! I've had my fill of dark, heavy, weighty, grey, pompus sci-fi that takes itself soooo seriously and thinks it can offer some amazing insight into the human condition that's never been imagined before, usually by hitting us over the head with it. An anvil is not deep. It's just heavy.it lacks the depth of the TNG movies, like "Insurrection" - but that's probably comparing apples and oranges. Still, a cool movie, not only for fans of the original series.
Agreed. As we seem to not be worrying about spoilers any more as enough folk have actually seen it...
I appreciated that the change in time-line allowed us to accept some differences in the characterization. Kirk was still Kirk, but we accept that this Kirk, raised without a dad (or brother if you recall the original Trek), is more insubordinate than ever, looking for trouble, etc. Quinto's Spock has not served a year under Captain Pike when we meet him. He never, because of disrupted time, gets that chance to be tempered by that experience and instead has this trauma to make him a little different.
And yet...it's still Spock!
And I'm probably going to see it again as well, as you're absolutely right. It went by so fast that I'm sure I missed stuff. I'm hoping it's even better the second time around.
The moment he started speaking, I couldn't buy into the character. The delivery of his lines were staid. I simply thought he was a lousy actor. PS? It didn't help that he didn't look like Chekov.![]()
Did I mention? I know the time line thing, but I really liked Janice and Nurse Christine Chapel in the original series. Was sad not to see them in this version. Perhaps the next.I like the girls.