Western Civilization Depends On Men And Masculinity

I don't believe in superiority of one group or the other. One can be part of a downtrodden minority and totally be a wanker. Problem is, when the wanker is part of the majority together with many other wankers.
Every population and society has their number of wankers. That's normal. But if the number of wankers is too high the society dies. It gets suffocated by the wankers, because societies are like a melting pot, the scum floods on top (and tries to run for a third term).
This is why the left is dying. Too many wankers, like yourself.
 
That’s a sentimental dodge, not a serious answer. Giving birth is vital to the continuation of civilization, but it’s not the same as building one. Civilization is what happens after birth, when men and women turn survival into structure: family, homes, laws, roads, cities, art, and industry. Bravery in childbirth is real, but so is the courage and ability to fight wars, mine ore, drain swamps, forge steel, and defend borders. Without men as builders, defenders, and innovators, there’s nothing for children to inherit except dirt and memories.

That’s a romantic revision of history, not an archaeological fact. Agriculture didn’t spring from one gender’s ingenuity; it emerged from entire communities experimenting over generations. Men cleared forests, built irrigation systems, and domesticated animals while women tended and gathered; both roles were symbiotic, not revolutionary on their own. Claiming women “probably invented agriculture” is like saying the person who planted the first seed invented civilization, flattering, maybe, but historically unserious.

Too bad MAGA isn’t forward thinking for innovation. The USA is going to fall far behind as the rest of the world moves past petroleum.
 
You can't be a true man until you stop sucking on the orange mushroom.

Sorry, but you can't have it both ways. No pun.
When someone starts babbling about “orange mushrooms,” it’s a confession, not an argument. That’s what people say when they can’t name a single policy they actually understand. Mocking Trump’s tan is easier than admitting his results made their entire ideology look like performance art.
 
Too bad MAGA isn’t forward thinking for innovation. The USA is going to fall far behind as the rest of the world moves past petroleum.
That’s wishful thinking wrapped in what we like to refer to here in the West as rodeo dirt. The “rest of the world” isn’t moving past petroleum; they’re buying it from us while pretending to be green. Every electric car, solar panel, and wind turbine is built, mined, and transported with oil, gas, and coal. MAGA isn’t anti-innovation, it’s anti-delusion. Real progress means energy independence and technological dominance, not trading pipelines for photo ops with purple-haired human pin cushions and Chinese lithium dependency.
 
When someone starts babbling about “orange mushrooms,” it’s a confession, not an argument. That’s what people say when they can’t name a single policy they actually understand. Mocking Trump’s tan is easier than admitting his results made their entire ideology look like performance art.
Nobody thinks you are cool or smart or that you have posted a single correct opinion in the 8 1/2 years you have participated here as "rightguide". Nor in the previous years as other failed alts.
 
Nobody thinks you are cool or smart or that you have posted a single correct opinion in the 8 1/2 years you have participated here as "rightguide". Nor in the previous years as other failed alts.
Eight and a half years of posting, and your contribution to this conversation is basically, “You’re not cool or smart.” That’s not a critique, it’s a monument to your intellectual bankruptcy, the kind of comment you leave when you’ve run out of facts, logic, and dignity. I have posted under this name and this name alone. I have never haunted your past, here or anywhere else.
 
You only copy and paste some inane articles and resort to the same old cliches when someone mocks your orang-u-tan. What were you doing for the past so many years when the so-called "destruction of machoism" was happening? Waiting for your messiah?
I was busy watching reality unfold and actually analyzing it, not performing interpretive dances over every cultural fad the left decided to declare dead. The “destruction of machoism” isn’t a crisis; it’s a narrative invented by people, like you, desperate to feel historically relevant. Mock me all you want, but it won’t hide the fact that the world keeps turning while your feminine crusade against masculinity collapses into absurdity.:rolleyes:
 
I was busy watching reality unfold and actually analyzing it, not performing interpretive dances over every cultural fad the left decided to declare dead. The “destruction of machoism” isn’t a crisis; it’s a narrative invented by people, like you, desperate to feel historically relevant. Mock me all you want, but it won’t hide the fact that the world keeps turning while your feminine crusade against masculinity collapses into absurdity.:rolleyes:

Few women are attracted to a man who’s always whining like a lil bitch.
 
You proved my point while attacking it.

Evolution tends to weed out what we don't need. If women are doing less than half the work, then they would be less than half the population.
That’s a spectacularly flawed syllogism. Population size has nothing to do with the amount of labor a group performs. Women make up roughly half the population precisely because biology dictates reproduction, not because of productivity quotas. :D
 
There is a crucial difference between necessary work to build and maintain a civilization, and less productive activities that waste and destroy our resources. This civilization has unprecedented levels of waste and destruction. There is tremendous work ahead in salvaging what we can from the destruction.
 
October 22, 2025

Western Civilization Depends on Men and Masculinity​

By Mark Keenan

For centuries, men built and defended Western civilization -- from its farms and cities to its laws, its art, and its moral order. But in just a few generations, that foundation has been​
Silly boy! It was the "masculine" men of the Third Reich, Mussolini's Fascists, Juan Peron, Marshall Pétain, etc. etc. etc. even the Bushido freaks who attacked your Pearl Harbour who were the people trashing civilised society!

But thanks for the mention of art. I'm sure you're referring to Cocteau, Michelangelo, Dali, Basquiat, Kahlo, Eakins, Haring, and, of course, Sir Elton John and many others as the epitome of masculine art!
 
Silly boy! It was the "masculine" men of the Third Reich, Mussolini's Fascists, Juan Peron, Marshall Pétain, etc. etc. etc. even the Bushido freaks who attacked your Pearl Harbour who were the people trashing civilised society!

But thanks for the mention of art. I'm sure you're referring to Cocteau, Michelangelo, Dali, Basquiat, Kahlo, Eakins, Haring, and, of course, Sir Elton John and many others as the epitome of masculine art!
And please don't forget Simeon Solomon, Romaine Brooks, Claude Cahun, J. C. Leyendecker, Beauford Delaney, Eardley Knollys, George Platt Lynes, Hugh Steers, Martin Wong, Peter Hujar, George Tooker and Thomas Lanigan-Schmidt.
If we spread knowledge, why not mentioning these gentlemen. They deserve it.
 
Not racism, chan.

I absolutely know the meaning and am using it correctly to describe your retarded rants.

"My side", whatever that means, wants the Epstein files released but you pedophile lovers want to protect president pedophile so you can continue fucking children. You fuckers' mouths have seen more baby dick than pampers.

Why didnt your side want the epstein files released when biden was in office foe four years?
 
Why didnt your side want the epstein files released when biden was in office foe four years?
My side has never been in charge of the USA, but if you mean the democrats, well I guess because they never said they would, they never campaigned on the fact they woukd release them and they never made a big deal about them only to change their minds because they found themselves implicated in a pedophile ring. Stop protecting your fellow pedophiles!
 
My side has never been in charge of the USA, but if you mean the democrats, well I guess because they never said they would, they never campaigned on the fact they woukd release them and they never made a big deal about them only to change their minds because they found themselves implicated in a pedophile ring. Stop protecting your fellow pedophiles!

Say didnt democrats block the release of the epstein files during the biden administration?
 
Back
Top