Western Civilization Depends On Men And Masculinity

Say didnt democrats block the release of the epstein files during the biden administration?

LMAO! The truth shall set you free! Or... Make a dumb magat skeeedaddle from a thread faster than dollar bills at a strip club.
 
That’s wishful thinking wrapped in what we like to refer to here in the West as rodeo dirt. The “rest of the world” isn’t moving past petroleum; they’re buying it from us while pretending to be green. Every electric car, solar panel, and wind turbine is built, mined, and transported with oil, gas, and coal. MAGA isn’t anti-innovation, it’s anti-delusion. Real progress means energy independence and technological dominance, not trading pipelines for photo ops with purple-haired human pin cushions and Chinese lithium dependency.

Innovation and incentives in renewables has been providing consumers with options for producing their own energy. Innovation and incentives in petroleum provides higher profits for petroleum companies (one of the most profitable section the economy) who still bill consumers based on what the market will bear.


Under Republicans, men fuck over anyone they can for the sake of profits.
 
October 22, 2025

Western Civilization Depends on Men and Masculinity​

By Mark Keenan

For centuries, men built and defended Western civilization -- from its farms and cities to its laws, its art, and its moral order. But in just a few generations, that foundation has been shaken. Masculinity, once honored as the engine of strength, protection, and leadership, is now treated as a social problem. The very qualities that sustained families, communities, and nations are being redefined as “toxic.” Today, masculinity itself is treated as something to be “reformed” or “re-educated.” What happened? How did the very qualities that built the modern world become objects of suspicion and ridicule?
The truth is simpler: Western civilization depends on men and masculinity -- and it cannot survive without them.​

The Quiet War on Manhood

Since the mid-20th century, Western culture has undergone an ideological shift that redefined traditional masculinity as something outdated, even dangerous. The cultural shifts of the 1960s promised liberation but gradually replaced personal responsibility and family order with self-gratification and state dependence. Where strong families once formed the backbone of the West, an alliance of ideological radicalism and excessive consumerism has turned both men and women into disconnected individuals -- easier to manipulate, easier to control.

This erosion of masculine identity didn’t happen by accident. It was shaped through decades of social conditioning that cast male authority as oppressive, fatherhood as optional, and discipline as cruelty. In recent years, even government agencies have launched programs to ‘redefine’ masculinity, echoing language once confined to activist circles. The result is a culture where men are encouraged to suppress their natural instincts -- their drive to lead, protect, and provide -- in favor of emotional conformity. The modern man is expected to apologize for being male.

https://www.americanthinker.com/art...ilization_depends_on_men_and_masculinity.html

No truer words have been spoken.​
Might also require vaginas and eggs. Just sayin'
 
For good or bad, it was men who built the world from the time of the cavemen. The world was built as human nature demanded it be built. Our modern word was forged through brute force.

Once cultures around the world came into a semblance of stability (as if that's the case today - LOL) - basically, when it became safe to do so, women were allowed more of a standing on events.

This is not a bad thing at all, but the world needs strength to deter aggression from those that mean it harm. There are a few female world leaders that follow in Margaret Thatcher's footsteps, but, sorry, ladies - the safeguarding of peace around the world still comes down to the will of men.
 
For good or bad, it was men who built the world from the time of the cavemen. The world was built as human nature demanded it be built. Our modern word was forged through brute force.

Once cultures around the world came into a semblance of stability (as if that's the case today - LOL) - basically, when it became safe to do so, women were allowed more of a standing on events.

This is not a bad thing at all, but the world needs strength to deter aggression from those that mean it harm. There are a few female world leaders that follow in Margaret Thatcher's footsteps, but, sorry, ladies - the safeguarding of peace around the world still comes down to the will of men.

By this twisted logic black Americans should be shitting on whites and running things.
 
Say didnt democrats block the release of the epstein files during the biden administration?
Nope.

Starting in 2019, but before Epstein’s arrest that year on federal sex trafficking charges, some Democratic lawmakers including Representative Lois Frankel and Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz, both of South Florida, launched a years-long quest to release Epstein records.

The Democrats called for former US Attorney Alex Acosta, who served as labour secretary during Trump’s first term, to testify about Epstein’s plea deal. They asked the Justice Department to investigate and release records. Democrats later pursued other strategies, including asking a Palm Beach, Florida judge to release records.

“A full accounting for these heinous crimes is lacking,” Wasserman Schultz told PolitiFact in an August 1 written statement. “Those prospects changed when Republicans momentarily joined the call for full disclosure.”
 
Innovation and incentives in renewables has been providing consumers with options for producing their own energy. Innovation and incentives in petroleum provides higher profits for petroleum companies (one of the most profitable section the economy) who still bill consumers based on what the market will bear.


Under Republicans, men fuck over anyone they can for the sake of profits.
I call bullshit. An industry that makes an average of one trillion dollars in profits per year received at least 1.3 trillion dollars in explicit subsidies worldwide in a single year. The International Energy Agency (IEA) and the OECD even put the total at 1.6 trillion US dollars in taxpayer money for fossil fuels . The following year, in 2023, the IEA reported that explicit subsidies still amounted to 1.1 trillion dollars.
 
Getting your ass handed to you in every thread. Why don't you go back to Truth Social and leave this place for the intelligent folks.
Where? I have at least 3 triggered Karens in this thread and you're one of them.

I'm speaking TRUTH to KARENS....and it's working.

This place for the intelligent folks??? LMFAO!!!! You probably say the same about that flop blue sky :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: keep huffing your own farts Karen.
 

Facts, that's why your only response to them is name calling.

What exactly do you have besides your shrinking sense of superiority?

It's not a sense and it's not shrinking.

With reguard to what? You're just randomly yapping......connect with the conversation bud.

You’re an intellectual pussy.

Says the name caller who REFUSES to engage in the actual conversation.

You lefties can't help but confess with every accusation. :ROFLMAO:


Actually, pussies are much stronger and more resilient than your sorry self. 😜

Then why are they attached to the least resilient humans???
 
Nope.
Your just a very weird ... person, and I use the term loosely, with a very sick mind. And yes, I also use the term mind loosely.

Uh oh. Another Karen....anyone who doesn't see things her way is "weird" and "sick".

Do you also tone police people when they say factual shit you can't refute but don't like being said out loud?

Would be the Karen thing to do.
 
Not racism, chan.

Claims not racist while being racist.....sure thing NIGGER (totally not racist btw) .

I absolutely know the meaning and am using it correctly to describe your retarded rants.

You keep gaslighting yourself like that and you'll continue to look like a leftoid. An actual retard.

"My side", whatever that means,

Lefty communist.....you know what you are, an anti-American pile of shit. Just like all the Democrat and not democrat but always shilling for them leftoids.
 
Claims not racist while being racist.....sure thing NIGGER (totally not racist btw) .



You keep gaslighting yourself like that and you'll continue to look like a leftoid. An actual retard.



Lefty communist.....you know what you are, an anti-American pile of shit. Just like all the Democrat and not democrat but always shilling for them leftoids.
Oooh, chan let's his racism loose. A racist trumptard and a pedophile, I'm not shocked.

Communist...lol what an uneducated trumptard thing to say. Talk about a histrionic pedo...
 
oops.

still doesn't explain why they weren't released during the election.

or the one before that and the one before that.

if I had damaging proof to take out my opponent I would...wouldn't you?
Poor stupid homo, protecting his fellow pedophiles and child groomers. You are a sad excuse. Your father was right to be ashamed of his homo pedo son.
 
I call bullshit. An industry that makes an average of one trillion dollars in profits per year received at least 1.3 trillion dollars in explicit subsidies worldwide in a single year. The International Energy Agency (IEA) and the OECD even put the total at 1.6 trillion US dollars in taxpayer money for fossil fuels . The following year, in 2023, the IEA reported that explicit subsidies still amounted to 1.1 trillion dollars.
That’s a distortion dressed up in statistics. The so-called “1.3 trillion in fossil fuel subsidies” isn’t government handouts to oil companies, it’s largely consumer price controls in developing countries to keep fuel affordable for citizens, not profit padding for ExxonMobil. The International Energy Agency itself clarifies that these are “consumer subsidies,” not corporate welfare.

Actual U.S. fossil fuel tax incentives are a fraction of that, about $20 billion per year, and most of those are standard business deductions also available to other industries. Meanwhile, renewables pocket over $1.2 trillion globally in real taxpayer subsidies, plus mandates, tax credits, and regulatory advantages.

In short, those numbers are inflated by redefining “subsidy” to include market stabilization and tax norms, not cash gifts to oil giants. If fossil fuels were truly “subsidy dependent,” the world would have gone dark decades ago.
 
Innovation and incentives in renewables has been providing consumers with options for producing their own energy. Innovation and incentives in petroleum provides higher profits for petroleum companies (one of the most profitable section the economy) who still bill consumers based on what the market will bear.


Under Republicans, men fuck over anyone they can for the sake of profits.
Funny how "renewable innovation" only thrives when strapped to the taxpayer like a life-support machine. Oil built the modern world your iPhone, your food, and your outrage all run on it. Without oil, your solar panels don’t get made, your food doesn’t get delivered, and your "green virtue" doesn’t get tweeted. Profit isn’t the problem, it’s the power bill you still expect someone else to pay.
 
That’s a distortion dressed up in statistics. The so-called “1.3 trillion in fossil fuel subsidies” isn’t government handouts to oil companies, it’s largely consumer price controls in developing countries to keep fuel affordable for citizens, not profit padding for ExxonMobil. The International Energy Agency itself clarifies that these are “consumer subsidies,” not corporate welfare.

Actual U.S. fossil fuel tax incentives are a fraction of that, about $20 billion per year, and most of those are standard business deductions also available to other industries. Meanwhile, renewables pocket over $1.2 trillion globally in real taxpayer subsidies, plus mandates, tax credits, and regulatory advantages.

In short, those numbers are inflated by redefining “subsidy” to include market stabilization and tax norms, not cash gifts to oil giants. If fossil fuels were truly “subsidy dependent,” the world would have gone dark decades ago.
Yes, yes, please go on repeating API and MAGA lies.
And that's what it is.
Renewables don't need to "pocket" anything. They are the cheapest way to produce electricity. Oil, gas and coal need that and get it. That's the only reason why they can compete.
I could all destroy all of these lies easily. Everyone in the industry can. But what for? Clueless API echo chambers will proceed echoing lies anyway. Trump sock puppet.
 
For good or bad, it was men who built the world from the time of the cavemen. The world was built as human nature demanded it be built. Our modern word was forged through brute force.

Once cultures around the world came into a semblance of stability (as if that's the case today - LOL) - basically, when it became safe to do so, women were allowed more of a standing on events.

This is not a bad thing at all, but the world needs strength to deter aggression from those that mean it harm. There are a few female world leaders that follow in Margaret Thatcher's footsteps, but, sorry, ladies - the safeguarding of peace around the world still comes down to the will of men.

Almost no woman these days understands that she can walk down the street wearing a crop top and Yoga pants without getting robbed/raped/murdered is because men created the laws and society that protects her.
 
Back
Top