What Are You Thinking? Continued 14

Our beef was in public thread quite a long time ago.

I have never pm her and would never pursue someone who is exclusive with another.

And if I could put her in my iggy I would but that isn't an option.

If it was an option none of this would have had to taken place.

All I am pointing out is that her actions COULD implicate an innocent person.

So why protect the person she is implicating at the risk of collateral damage to an innocent person's reputation?
As a complete bystander to this conversation, but someone who is reasonably intelligent - I didn’t for a second think you were who she was talking about until you started to make such a big deal of it.

Amber doesn’t agree with you, you don’t agree with Amber. Now would be the point where you should let it go to not tarnish your own reputation as someone who will push and push beyond boundaries.
 
As a complete bystander to this conversation, but someone who is reasonably intelligent - I didn’t for a second think you were who she was talking about until you started to make such a big deal of it.

Amber doesn’t agree with you, you don’t agree with Amber. Now would be the point where you should let it go to not tarnish your own reputation as someone who will push and push beyond boundaries.
I said my piece as far as I am concerned it is over
 
I have both of those (I'm a data analyst at heart)... it sounds like a nightmare LOL
One of the reason I dislike Olympic events that are judged.
Give me the timed events every time.

As an example there was a Russian ice skater that fell during his routine and still medaled
 
Back
Top