LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

What Are You Thinking? Continued 14

Hornymwtxn said:
Excuse me for being concerned her post COULD be smearing someone's reputation with her vague implications.
Click to expand...
Is there any concern that there is somebody out there who is disrespecting her, her partner and their relationship even when they have been told no on numerous occasions?

This isn’t about the person who is disrespecting her, this about her feelings and how uncomfortable they are making her feel.

If they cannot stop harassing her even when she has clearly said no, then they deserve to have their reputation smeared. I would love her to name names but she won’t do that because she is too considerate and knows that a lot of people would give that person a hard time because of the lack of respect and boundaries.

Regardless of whatever issues you have had with her, she isn’t in the wrong here. Sometimes you have to be the bigger person and realise that not everything she posts is about you
 
AmberLGreen said:
Is there any concern that there is somebody out there who is disrespecting her, her partner and their relationship even when they have been told no on numerous occasions?

This isn’t about the person who is disrespecting her, this about her feelings and how uncomfortable they are making her feel.

If they cannot stop harassing her even when she has clearly said no, then they deserve to have their reputation smeared. I would love her to name names but she won’t do that because she is too considerate and knows that a lot of people would give that person a hard time because of the lack of respect and boundaries.

Regardless of whatever issues you have had with her, she isn’t in the wrong here. Sometimes you have to be the bigger person and realise that not everything she posts is about you
Click to expand...
Name names or stop with the implications that could harm someone's reputation.
Not a big ask
 
LaisDeMarieDeFrance said:
A lot of women here chat and ask each other about men. If someone is a nice guy, we'll say that. If they're not, we'll warn each other.

Someone has to be a real rat to be outed publicly.
Click to expand...
Totally get that but want her to be aware that she could be damaging someone else's reputation and thus name names or stop with the implications
 
I've written a translation guide for you ladies.

**What a Man Means When he says . .**

I’m hungry – I’m hungry.

I’m tired – I’m tired.

Do you want to go to see a film? – I would like to have sex with you.

Can I take you out to dinner? – I would like to have sex with you.

Can I call you sometime? – I would like to have sex with you.

Would you like to dance? – I would like to have sex with you.

Nice dress! – Nice tits!

You look tense, let me give you a massage – I would like to have sex with you, but first I want you to take your clothes off so I can fondle you.

What’s wrong? – I don’t see why you’re making such a big fucking deal about a bit of a fondle.

What’s wrong? – What meaningless self-inflicted stupid psychological trauma are you going through now?

What’s wrong? – Damn, guess sex is out of the question tonight .

I’m bored – Do you want to have sex or not?

I love you – I want it NOW!

I love you, too – Okay I’ve said it, so can we please have sex NOW!?

Yes, I like what you have done with your hair – I liked it better before.

Yes, I like what you have done with your hair – £30 and it doesn’t look that much different!

Let’s talk – I am trying to impress you by showing you that I am a deep person and maybe then you’d like to have sex with me.

Will you marry me? – I want to make it illegal for you to have sex with other men.

I like that dress better – For fuck’s sake, just buy any dress and let’s go home!

I don’t think that top and that skirt go well together – I am gay.
 
Hornymwtxn said:
Name names or stop with the implications that could harm someone's reputation.
Not a big ask
Click to expand...
Wow! You really took it to heart when she put you on iggy, didn’t you? You don’t need to play the dicktim here, she probably has the longest iggy list on Lit. You are a tiny speck on that list.

Ask yourself something - did you, knowing she was in a very loving relationship, pursue her and not take no for an answer? If not, why would you even think that she was referring to you?

By not naming the person, she is protecting their reputation not smearing it.
 
AmberLGreen said:
Wow! You really took it to heart when she put you on iggy, didn’t you? You don’t need to play the dicktim here, she probably has the longest iggy list on Lit. You are a tiny speck on that list.

Ask yourself something - did you, knowing she was in a very loving relationship, pursue her and not take no for an answer? If not, why would you even think that she was referring to you?

By not naming the person, she is protecting their reputation not smearing it.
Click to expand...
Our beef was in public thread quite a long time ago.

I have never pm her and would never pursue someone who is exclusive with another.

And if I could put her in my iggy I would but that isn't an option.

If it was an option none of this would have had to taken place.

All I am pointing out is that her actions COULD implicate an innocent person.

So why protect the person she is implicating at the risk of collateral damage to an innocent person's reputation?
 
AmberLGreen said:
Wow! You really took it to heart when she put you on iggy, didn’t you? You don’t need to play the dicktim here, she probably has the longest iggy list on Lit. You are a tiny speck on that list.

Ask yourself something - did you, knowing she was in a very loving relationship, pursue her and not take no for an answer? If not, why would you even think that she was referring to you?

By not naming the person, she is protecting their reputation not smearing it.
Click to expand...
Oh and I dgaf if I am on her iggy
 
Hornymwtxn said:
Our beef was in public thread quite a long time ago.

I have never pm her and would never pursue someone who is exclusive with another.

And if I could put her in my iggy I would but that isn't an option.

If it was an option none of this would have had to taken place.

All I am pointing out is that her actions COULD implicate an innocent person.

So why protect the person she is implicating at the risk of collateral damage to an innocent person's reputation?
Click to expand...
As a complete bystander to this conversation, but someone who is reasonably intelligent - I didn’t for a second think you were who she was talking about until you started to make such a big deal of it.

Amber doesn’t agree with you, you don’t agree with Amber. Now would be the point where you should let it go to not tarnish your own reputation as someone who will push and push beyond boundaries.
 
cheekygirl75 said:
As a complete bystander to this conversation, but someone who is reasonably intelligent - I didn’t for a second think you were who she was talking about until you started to make such a big deal of it.

Amber doesn’t agree with you, you don’t agree with Amber. Now would be the point where you should let it go to not tarnish your own reputation as someone who will push and push beyond boundaries.
Click to expand...
I said my piece as far as I am concerned it is over
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

lil_jenni
Two lies, one truth
10 11 12
Replies
286
Views
4K
PageWriter2
P
U
Women in Sexless Marriages: What can be Done?
2
Replies
27
Views
759
daddysbadgrl728
daddysbadgrl728
kieranhalcyon01
What made you say "fuck, I'm old" today?
30 31 32
Replies
783
Views
13K
dkak001
dkak001
Tossawayalt
What are you drinking?
2
Replies
48
Views
316
TiedbyChris
TiedbyChris
EctoJohn
The Incredible League of Super Litsters!
Replies
0
Views
152
EctoJohn
EctoJohn
Back
Top