Trump fires DEI HIRE criminal "economist" from the FED

[dmallord]

There's an appeal of the verdict. Should the appeal succeed, and in all likelihood it will, stating that he was found guilty would be a misstatement because a reversal of the guilty verdict on appeal would result in an instruction to the trial court to vacate the guilty finding and enter non obstante veredicto as the result.

Not that you're ever going to admit that, if the appeal is successful, he will be determined to be not guilty, you'll cling to the original jury verdict as evidence of his guilt even while KNOWING it's a lie. Because you're fucking stupid that way.

Yes, the neverending trail of his appeals for one crime or another. It's a pattern, is it not? You know what they say about patterns appearing in evidence?

Until the felon's appeal is overturned, he is guilty, right? You've never admitted that to date. You just keep holding your breath and turning blue over the obvious fact that he was found guilty by a jury of his peers.

Under your points, lawyer, Cook is not a felon, not on trial, not convicted and, yet, you assign guilt before judgement. Something you call 'presumption of innocence' is missing in your claim. That's not applicable to the Felon. He was guilty as charged 34 times on felony fraud least you forget.

 

[HisArpy]

Spoken like a mall based injury attorney. Is that an ambulance siren?

Remember what mark Twain said... bye bye

^is totally fucked in the head to the point he has no idea what he's spewing and is unaware it makes no sense whatsoever.

 

[HisArpy]

The only bullshit spinner is you peewee

Riiiight. Is that why conservatives are winning? Because 90% of us are spinning bullshit.

Meanwhile there are all those tall tales you spread and keep trying to make believe are true...

 

[PaxNurgle]

Yes, the neverending trail of his appeals for one crime or another. It's a pattern, is it not? You know what they say about patterns appearing in evidence?

Until the felon's appeal is overturned, he is guilty, right? You've never admitted that to date. You just keep holding your breath and turning blue over the obvious fact that he was found guilty by a jury of his peers.

Under your points, lawyer, Cook is not a felon, not on trial, not convicted and, yet, you assign guilt before judgement. Something you call 'presumption of innocence' is missing in your claim. That's not applicable to the Felon. He was guilty as charged 34 times on felony fraud least you forget.

While I agree completely, the issue here is that you assume that Hisarpy/Wallstreet5soulguy/etc. actually has even a rudimentary understanding of, or even respect for, the law. And remember, we are dealing with a guy who very likely has had little formal education beyond the 10th grade.

 

[colddiesel]

The proposition of the Thread starter that criminality should disqualify a candidate from either a Federal Statutory Authority (like the Fed) or indeed, from the current administration is fascinating. If only that were true!

 

[HisArpy]

Yes, the neverending trail of his appeals for one crime or another. It's a pattern, is it not? You know what they say about patterns appearing in evidence?

Until the felon's appeal is overturned, he is guilty, right? You've never admitted that to date. You just keep holding your breath and turning blue over the obvious fact that he was found guilty by a jury of his peers.

Under your points, lawyer, Cook is not a felon, not on trial, not convicted and, yet, you assign guilt before judgement. Something you call 'presumption of innocence' is missing in your claim. That's not applicable to the Felon. He was guilty as charged 34 times on felony fraud least you forget.

Persecution always follows the same pattern. Coincidentally, it's the exact pattern we're seeing here.

Criminality, OTOH, doesn't follow this pattern. A career criminal gets caught, convicted, sentenced, goes to jail, gets out on parole, then re offends.

Which is a pattern we don't see with Trump since his convictions/verdicts of liability are either in his favor or are set aside on appeal for what amounts to miscarriage of justice.


As to Cook; a trial/conviction isn't required for termination from her job. that's an HR decision and it can be based on appearances of impropriety and loss of confidence. Either are sufficient to constitute cause.

 

[HisArpy]

While I agree completely, the issue here is that you assume that Hisarpy/Wallstreet5soulguy/etc. actually has even a rudimentary understanding of, or even respect for, the law. And remember, we are dealing with a guy who very likely has had little formal education beyond the 10th grade.

Still waiting on next week's winning lottery numbers...

 

[Bn2f]

Still waiting on next week's winning lottery numbers...

How many lottery references you plan to drop today?
MegaMillions! Drink. Hiccup. Drink again.

 

[HisArpy]

How many lottery references you plan to drop today?
MegaMillions! Drink. Hiccup. Drink again.

Easy solution: You could consult that crystal ball you use for predicting the downfall of civilization (which never seems to be accurate) or STFU.

Anything else is just you being a lousy lying loser.

 

[ll74]

As to Cook; a trial/conviction isn't required for termination from her job. that's an HR decision and it can be based on appearances of impropriety and loss of confidence. Either are sufficient to constitute cause.

There is no HR. What you're saying is that the President can just make shit up and fire her by calling it "just cause".

And that would fly in the face of the law. Reference to the DoJ is not an indication of guilt/crime.

 

[Baztrachian]

https://www.city-journal.org/article/lisa-d-cooks-careless-scholarship

 

[dmallord]

Persecution always follows the same pattern. Coincidentally, it's the exact pattern we're seeing here.

No it isn't.

Criminality, OTOH, doesn't follow this pattern. A career criminal gets caught, convicted, sentenced, goes to jail, gets out on parole, then re offends.

That's not true either. Trump has been involved in crimes of various types. He is the exeption to your definition. Due to power, influence, and sitting as a felon in the president's gold-gilded chair, he was sentenced the last time, never went to jail because he was Trump and running for the presidency. He immediately began reoffending the nation by leveraging his position to persecute his enemies claiming to be his followers 'retribution.'

Which is a pattern we don't see with Trump since his convictions/verdicts of liability are either in his favor or are set aside on appeal for what amounts to miscarriage of justice.

The misccariage of justice is what you have stated. His wealth and current position shield him from actions a normal criminal element would be behind bars for.

As to Cook; a trial/conviction isn't required for termination from her job. that's an HR decision and it can be based on appearances of impropriety and loss of confidence. Either are sufficient to constitute cause.

Cook is not under HR supervision. Not charged, not tried, nor convicted. You're way to eager to allow justice to take its course. The SC has made it clear that her position isn't subject to Trump's whims. Sucks to be Trump over this issue.

 

[1984X2024]

The FAT, the BLACK, the RACIST, the UGLY CUNT is cooked

Even WAPO says

ITS a CRIMINAL

Cook, COOKED

https://twitter.com/x/status/1961766414445887614

 

[Rightguide]

If this goes to the SCOTUS it could be the demise of the Fed. Bottom line, Congress cannot create an agency of government outside the executive branch. or independent of presidential authority.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Probably get someone competent in there, someone that doesn't buy into the Modern Monetary Policy bull shit.

 

[Rebel5soul]

If this goes to the SCOTUS it could be the demise of the Fed. Bottom line, Congress cannot create an agency of government outside the executive branch. or independent of presidential authority.

The rest of the governors should be all over her ass to resign so it doesn't go that far. But she's a big, fat, stupid, entitled, black woman so I don't see her resigning anytime soon.

 

[HisArpy]

Probably get someone competent in there, someone that doesn't buy into the Modern Monetary Policy bull shit.

It's interesting that, in its way, Modern Monetary Policy could have advantages over current monetary policy.

The problem is that it's too full of hot air and dreams of success instead of facing reality.

 

[Rebel5soul]

It's interesting that, in its way, Modern Monetary Policy could have advantages over current monetary policy.

The problem is that it's too full of hot air and dreams of success instead of facing reality.

The problem with all of that stuff is that it's theory and we, the citizens, are the lab rats they test their theories on.

 

[HisArpy]

The problem with all of that stuff is that it's theory and we, the citizens, are the lab rats they test their theories on.

MMT is basically Bit Coin and that's been being tested for years now.

The problem is that eventually the bill will come due and MMT doesn't have a way to settle up. All it does is push the final reckoning down the road for later generations to deal with.

Which, incidentally, is what we're already doing with the national debt.

 

[Rebel5soul]

MMT is basically Bit Coin and that's been being tested for years now.

The problem is that eventually the bill will come due and MMT doesn't have a way to settle up. All it does is push the final reckoning down the road for later generations to deal with.

Which, incidentally, is what we're already doing with the national debt.

Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner here.

Kicking the can down the road just the way the politicians avoid having to take responsibility for.................well.............anything. Trump is bringing to a head in several areas. Not all though, so many land mines.

 

[1984X2024]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1962710257496367174

 

[jomar]

Criminality, OTOH, doesn't follow this pattern. A career criminal gets caught, convicted, sentenced, goes to jail, gets out on parole, then re offends.

Which is a pattern we don't see with Trump since his convictions/verdicts of liability are either in his favor or are set aside on appeal for what amounts to miscarriage of justice.

You forgot to mention trump’s pattern: which is break the law, get caught, deny, deny, deny then delay, delay, delay then settle out of court meaning in trump world nothing ever happened.

As to Cook; a trial/conviction isn't required for termination from her job. that's an HR decision and it can be based on appearances of impropriety and loss of confidence. Either are sufficient to constitute cause.

HR, lol

 

[jomar]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1962710257496367174

You funny

 

[1984X2024]

SOME DEM WATER NOT EVEN CNN WILL CARRY:

CNN’s Top Legal Analyst Just Obliterated Fed Governor’s Legal Narrative on Mortgage Fiasco.

 

[ll74]

SOME DEM WATER NOT EVEN CNN WILL CARRY:

CNN’s Top Legal Analyst Just Obliterated Fed Governor’s Legal Narrative on Mortgage Fiasco.

Wtf are you talking about?