LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Trump fires DEI HIRE criminal "economist" from the FED

1984X2024 said:
by not denying

IT is admitting

so you all want a fraudster at the Fed!
Click to expand...
The lawsuit doesn't require any mention of fraud. She was fired without cause and is suing because of that. She will win.
 
First she commits fraud and now she’s suing because that got her fired?

I’ve read about her background in today’s WSJ (for what it’s worth). There is nothing in her background that tells me she has special knowledge and talents that make her suited to a job on the Fed board. Unfortunately, like Ketanji, they are proving the harm of DEI hires.

AND

IT is UGLY and FAT 1756406099288.jpeg
 
1984X2024 said:
First she commits fraud and now she’s suing because that got her fired?

I’ve read about her background in today’s WSJ (for what it’s worth). There is nothing in her background that tells me she has special knowledge and talents that make her suited to a job on the Fed board. Unfortunately, like Ketanji, they are proving the harm of DEI hires.

AND

IT is UGLY and FAT View attachment 2561020
Click to expand...
Aah yes, her looks 👍 how unique from you
 
1984X2024 said:
First she commits fraud and now she’s suing because that got her fired?

I’ve read about her background in today’s WSJ (for what it’s worth). There is nothing in her background that tells me she has special knowledge and talents that make her suited to a job on the Fed board. Unfortunately, like Ketanji, they are proving the harm of DEI hires.

AND

IT is UGLY and FAT
Click to expand...
Dude, you can't just fire someone because of their race. There are laws to protect against such things. Whether you (or Trump) like it or not.

What century do you think this is anyway? This isn't fucking Alabama in 1935 or some shit.
OF FUCKING COURSE she should sue. She had every right to. And no, I do not believe she committed fraud.
 
Do a little research.

. . . The president’s move against Cook, who has not been charged with a crime, was enabled by Bill Pulte—the 37-year-old head of the little-known Federal Housing Finance Agency. . . .

. . . Pulte did not respond to questions about why the donation went through a shell company, if he was involved in the donation credited to his wife, or whether the large donation helped him land his job in the administration.

He also has not addressed an FEC determination that the “contributor” of the funds—Diana Pulte—had incorrectly filled out a form to indicate the money came from an LLC rather than a member of the Pulte family. That looks like the same kind of paperwork sloppiness—in information ultimately provided to the federal government—that Bill Pulte is now harassing Trump foes over.

“I am extremely skeptical that Bill Pulte would come across 1/100th as well as Lisa Cook if his paperwork were scrutinized as closely as he has scrutinized Cook’s paperwork,” said Jeff Hauser, the executive director of the nonprofit Revolving Door Project, which tracks executive branch appointees it says fail to serve the broad public interest.

A New York judge ruled in 2023 that Trump himself had committed major mortgage fraud by inflating the value of his real estate holdings and other assets, in a case prosecuted by James’ office. An appeals court last week threw out a $550 million civil fine against Trump but left in place the underlying finding of fraud, which Trump is appealing.

As Trump touts untested fraud allegations—ones dwarfed by the large-scale fraud he was found liable for—the president appears to be suffering few consequences. But Pulte’s sudden prominence has put the FHFA director under the microscope.

He faces mounting congressional and media scrutiny over his actions at FHFA and his qualifications for the job, which include little housing policy experience beyond working on the board of the private construction company launched by his grandfather. Aside from that, Pulte’s work previously focused on running his private equity firm and on trading so-called meme stocks. . . .
 
Hel_Books said:
Do a little research.

. . . The president’s move against Cook, who has not been charged with a crime, was enabled by Bill Pulte—the 37-year-old head of the little-known Federal Housing Finance Agency. . . .

. . . Pulte did not respond to questions about why the donation went through a shell company, if he was involved in the donation credited to his wife, or whether the large donation helped him land his job in the administration.

He also has not addressed an FEC determination that the “contributor” of the funds—Diana Pulte—had incorrectly filled out a form to indicate the money came from an LLC rather than a member of the Pulte family. That looks like the same kind of paperwork sloppiness—in information ultimately provided to the federal government—that Bill Pulte is now harassing Trump foes over.

“I am extremely skeptical that Bill Pulte would come across 1/100th as well as Lisa Cook if his paperwork were scrutinized as closely as he has scrutinized Cook’s paperwork,” said Jeff Hauser, the executive director of the nonprofit Revolving Door Project, which tracks executive branch appointees it says fail to serve the broad public interest.

A New York judge ruled in 2023 that Trump himself had committed major mortgage fraud by inflating the value of his real estate holdings and other assets, in a case prosecuted by James’ office. An appeals court last week threw out a $550 million civil fine against Trump but left in place the underlying finding of fraud, which Trump is appealing.

As Trump touts untested fraud allegations—ones dwarfed by the large-scale fraud he was found liable for—the president appears to be suffering few consequences. But Pulte’s sudden prominence has put the FHFA director under the microscope.

He faces mounting congressional and media scrutiny over his actions at FHFA and his qualifications for the job, which include little housing policy experience beyond working on the board of the private construction company launched by his grandfather. Aside from that, Pulte’s work previously focused on running his private equity firm and on trading so-called meme stocks. . . .
Click to expand...
tough
 
Hel_Books said:
Do a little research.

. . . The president’s move against Cook, who has not been charged with a crime, was enabled by Bill Pulte—the 37-year-old head of the little-known Federal Housing Finance Agency. . . .

. . . Pulte did not respond to questions about why the donation went through a shell company, if he was involved in the donation credited to his wife, or whether the large donation helped him land his job in the administration.

He also has not addressed an FEC determination that the “contributor” of the funds—Diana Pulte—had incorrectly filled out a form to indicate the money came from an LLC rather than a member of the Pulte family. That looks like the same kind of paperwork sloppiness—in information ultimately provided to the federal government—that Bill Pulte is now harassing Trump foes over.

“I am extremely skeptical that Bill Pulte would come across 1/100th as well as Lisa Cook if his paperwork were scrutinized as closely as he has scrutinized Cook’s paperwork,” said Jeff Hauser, the executive director of the nonprofit Revolving Door Project, which tracks executive branch appointees it says fail to serve the broad public interest.

A New York judge ruled in 2023 that Trump himself had committed major mortgage fraud by inflating the value of his real estate holdings and other assets, in a case prosecuted by James’ office. An appeals court last week threw out a $550 million civil fine against Trump but left in place the underlying finding of fraud, which Trump is appealing.

As Trump touts untested fraud allegations—ones dwarfed by the large-scale fraud he was found liable for—the president appears to be suffering few consequences. But Pulte’s sudden prominence has put the FHFA director under the microscope.

He faces mounting congressional and media scrutiny over his actions at FHFA and his qualifications for the job, which include little housing policy experience beyond working on the board of the private construction company launched by his grandfather. Aside from that, Pulte’s work previously focused on running his private equity firm and on trading so-called meme stocks. . . .
Click to expand...
and keep in mind trump has also been accused and found guilty of fraud, takes one to know one.
 
whiskeytangofoxtrot said:
and keep in mind trump has also been accused and found guilty of fraud, takes one to know one.
Click to expand...

Lol, and yet part of that verdict was just overturned (like many here said it would be) and the remainder is on appeal and stands a good chance of being reversed too.

If it does get reversed, what will you say then?
 
HisArpy said:
Lol, and yet part of that verdict was just overturned (like many here said it would be) and the remainder is on appeal and stands a good chance of being reversed too.

If it does get reversed, what will you say then?
Click to expand...
he was still found guilty and corrupt.
 
Not the point

Point is Cook is a crook and fat and ugly and black and a lunatic

Fire IT
 
HisArpy said:
So, you'll spew yet another half truth in your effort to prove yourself more honorable than those who follow the law?
Click to expand...
No. Just spelled it out for you. He was found guilty of corruption. As for being honorable, absolutely.
 
Last edited:
HisArpy said:
Lol, and yet part of that verdict was just overturned (like many here said it would be) and the remainder is on appeal and stands a good chance of being reversed too.

If it does get reversed, what will you say then?
Click to expand...
The case is subject to further interpretation. The latter half of your comment is speculation.
 
whiskeytangofoxtrot said:
No. Just spelled it out for you. He was found guilty of corruption. As for being honorable, absolutely.
Click to expand...

There's an appeal of the verdict. Should the appeal succeed, and in all likelihood it will, stating that he was found guilty would be a misstatement because a reversal of the guilty verdict on appeal would result in an instruction to the trial court to vacate the guilty finding and enter non obstante veredicto as the result.

Not that you're ever going to admit that, if the appeal is successful, he will be determined to be not guilty, you'll cling to the original jury verdict as evidence of his guilt even while KNOWING it's a lie. Because you're fucking stupid that way.
 
Last edited:
HisArpy said:
There's an appeal of the verdict. Should the appeal succeed, and in all likelihood it will, stating that he was found guilty would be a misstatement because a reversal of the guilty verdict on appeal would result in an instruction to the trial court to vacate the guilty finding and enter non obstante veredicto as the result.

Not that you're ever going to admit that, if the appeal is successful, he will be determined to be not guilty, you'll cling to the original jury verdict as evidence of his guilt even while KNOWING it's a lie. Because you're fucking stupid that way.
Click to expand...
Spoken like a mall based injury attorney. Is that an ambulance siren?

Remember what mark Twain said... bye bye
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
Supreme Court Rules For Trump In DEI Research At NIH
Replies
23
Views
149
PaxNurgle
P
Rotadom
Here’s where all the legal cases against Trump stand since his return to the White House
Replies
0
Views
34
Rotadom
Rotadom
B
Kilmar Abrego Garcia released from criminal custody in Tennessee
Replies
13
Views
108
dingdongditchding
D
Rightguide
Five Years After The Fires
Replies
14
Views
310
YDB95
YDB95
P
Gabbard fires intelligence officials who contradict Trump regarding Venezuelan gangs
Replies
12
Views
217
Rebel5soul
R
Back
Top